| Literature DB >> 28851916 |
Yuya Miyauchi1, Kentaro Yasuchika2, Ken Fukumitsu1, Takamichi Ishii1, Satoshi Ogiso1, Takahito Minami1, Hidenobu Kojima1, Ryoya Yamaoka1, Hokahiro Katayama1, Takayuki Kawai1, Elena Yukie Yoshitoshi-Uebayashi1, Sadahiko Kita1, Katsutaro Yasuda1, Naoya Sasaki1, Shinji Uemoto1.
Abstract
Liver fibrosis is characterized by the progressive accumulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) and is a strong predictor of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) development and progression. However, the effect of ECM in fibrotic livers on HCC cells is poorly understood. The aims of this study were to create a new culture system that retained the natural ECM of fibrotic model livers and to establish whether natural ECM regulated the characteristics of HCC cells. Using an organ decellularization technique, we created a new culture system that preserved the tissue-specific ECM of fibrotic model livers from CCl4-treated rats. The content of ECM in fibrotic model liver scaffolds was increased and the ECM microstructure was distorted. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunofluorescence assays of HCC cells cultured in fibrotic model liver scaffolds for 7 days showed an epithelial-mesenchymal transition phenotype. Moreover, the ECM of fibrotic model livers promoted proliferation and chemoresistance of HCC cells. These results showed a novel effect of natural ECM in fibrotic model livers on the malignant behaviour of HCC cells. This new culture system will be useful for both understanding the cell biology of fibrotic livers and developing novel anti-cancer drugs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28851916 PMCID: PMC5575302 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09391-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Decellularization of normal and fibrotic model livers. (a) Macroscopic appearance of decellularized normal and fibrotic model livers. (b) Haematoxylin and eosin staining shows no remaining nuclei and cytoplasm in the scaffolds. (c) Quantification of double-stranded DNA shows that the decellularization procedure eliminated more than 99% of the DNA content in native livers. (d) Intrahepatic portal vein and bile duct staining demonstrate patency. Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared to the control. Scale bars: 100 µm.
Figure 2Characterization of decellularized livers. (a) Liver fibrosis is evaluated by Sirius Red staining. (b) The Sirius Red-positive area is quantified as a percentage of the total area using Image J software. (c) Collagen type I, fibronectin and laminin were increased and distributed diffusely in decellularized fibrotic model livers compared to decellularized normal livers. Quantification of extracellular matrix components indicates that hydroxyproline (d) and sulphated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) (e) are significantly higher in decellularized fibrotic model livers compared to decellularized normal livers. Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared to the control. Scale bars: 100 μm.
Figure 3Hepatocellular carcinoma cells cultured in decellularized normal and fibrotic model livers. Macroscopic appearance of HLF cells seeded into decellularized normal (a) and fibrotic model (b) livers. Histological examination shows that HLF cells are engrafted in decellularized normal (c) and fibrotic model (d) livers. Huh7 cells in decellularized normal (e) and fibrotic model (f) livers and are widely distributed in the parenchymal region. Scale bars: 100 μm.
Figure 4Gene expression and epithelial-mesenchymal transition phenotype analyses. (a) Normalized gene expression of Snail, Slug, vimentin, MMP-9, E-cadherin, MRP5, integrin β1 and TGFβR2 mRNA in HLF cells is measured by qRT-PCR. Gene abbreviations: MMP-9, matrix metalloproteinase-9; MRP5, multidrug resistance protein 5; TGFβR2, Transforming growth factor beta receptor 2. (b) Immunofluorescence staining shows that the number of vimentin-positive cells is increased and the number of E-cadherin-positive cells is decreased in fibrotic model liver scaffolds compared to normal liver scaffolds. This indicates that fibrotic model liver scaffolds promote the EMT phenotype. Scale bars: 100 μm. Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared to controls.
Figure 5Proliferation and chemoresistance of hepatocellular carcinoma cells in normal and fibrotic model liver scaffolds. (a) Quantification of HLF cell proliferation at day 7 using anti-Ki67 staining in decellularized normal and fibrotic model liver scaffolds. (b) Graphs showing the mean proliferative index (Ki67 positivity) of HLF cells in decellularized normal and fibrotic model liver scaffolds. (c) Quantification of apoptosis by TUNEL staining in normal and fibrotic model liver scaffolds. (d) Significantly more cells are TUNEL-positive in normal liver scaffolds than in fibrotic model liver scaffolds. Scale bars: 100 μm. Data are expressed as means ± SD (n = 3). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared to controls.
Figure 6Integrin β1 and phosphorylated focal adhesion kinase (pFAK) expression in HLF cells in decellularized liver scaffolds. Immunofluorescence staining shows that integrin β1 and pFAK expression is up-regulated to a greater extent in fibrotic model liver scaffolds compared to that in normal liver scaffolds. Scale bars: 100 μm.