Literature DB >> 28851825

Embryo biopsy and development: the known and the unknown.

Federica Zacchini1, Roberta Arena1, Adam Abramik1, Grazyna E Ptak1,2,3.   

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been introduced in clinical practice as a tool for selecting 'healthy' embryos before their transfer in utero. PGD protocols include biopsy of cleaving embryos (blastomere biopsy (BB)) or blastocysts (trophectoderm biopsy (TB)), followed by genetic analysis to select 'healthy' embryos for transfer in utero. Currently, TB is replacing the use of BB in the clinical practice. However, based on the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Consortium reports, BB has been used in >87% of PGD cycles for more than 10 years. An exhaustive evaluation of embryo biopsy (both BB and TB) risks and safety is still missing. The few epidemiological studies available are quite controversial and/or are limited to normalcy at birth or early childhood. On the other hand, studies on animals have shown that BB can be a risk factor for impaired development, during both pre- and postnatal life, while little is known on TB. Thus, there is an urgent need of focused researches on BB, as it has contributed to give birth to children for more than 10 years, and on TB, as its application is significantly growing in clinical practice. In this context, the aim of this review is to provide a complete overview of the current knowledge on the short-, medium- and long-term effects of embryo biopsy in the mouse model.
© 2017 Society for Reproduction and Fertility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28851825     DOI: 10.1530/REP-17-0431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reproduction        ISSN: 1470-1626            Impact factor:   3.906


  4 in total

1.  Problems with Using Polygenic Scores to Select Embryos.

Authors:  Patrick Turley; Michelle N Meyer; Nancy Wang; David Cesarini; Evelynn Hammonds; Alicia R Martin; Benjamin M Neale; Heidi L Rehm; Louise Wilkins-Haug; Daniel J Benjamin; Steven Hyman; David Laibson; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Polygenic risk score for embryo selection-not ready for prime time.

Authors:  Alex Polyakov; David J Amor; Julian Savulescu; Christopher Gyngell; Ektoras X Georgiou; Vanessa Ross; Yossi Mizrachi; Genia Rozen
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 6.353

3.  Should we transfer poor quality embryos?

Authors:  Anastasia Kirillova; Sergey Lysenkov; Maria Farmakovskaya; Yulia Kiseleva; Bella Martazanova; Nona Mishieva; Aydar Abubakirov; Gennady Sukhikh
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2020-02-19

4.  A Novel De Novo Chromosomal Insertion, 46 XX, ins(7:13)(p14; q14.2q21.1) is Related to the Embryo Development Arrest Following Assisted Reproductive Technique.

Authors:  Azam Azargoon; Nahid Azad
Journal:  J Reprod Infertil       Date:  2020 Oct-Dec
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.