| Literature DB >> 28851356 |
Samy Nagib1, Stefanie P Glaeser2, Tobias Eisenberg3, Osama Sammra1, Christoph Lämmler1, Peter Kämpfer2, Nicole Schauerte4, Christina Geiger4, Ute Kaim3, Ellen Prenger-Berninghoff5, André Becker6, Amir Abdulmawjood7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Trueperella pyogenes is a worldwide known bacterium causing mastitis, abortion and various other pyogenic infections in domestic animals like ruminants and pigs. In this study we represent the first case report of three unusual fatal infections of Grey Slender Lorises caused by Trueperella pyogenes. Meanwhile, this study represents the first in-depth description of the multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA) on T. pyogenes species. CASEEntities:
Keywords: DNA fingerprint; Loris lydekkerianus nordicus; Trueperella pyogenes; clonal relationship; grey slender loris; lorises; multilocus sequence analysis; virulence genes
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28851356 PMCID: PMC5576266 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-017-1171-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
The Oligonucleotide primer sequences and PCR conditions used in the present study
| Oligonucleotide primers | Sequence | Programa |
|---|---|---|
| 1. 16S rDNA UNI-L | 5′-AGA GTT TGA TCA TGG CTC AG-3′ | 1 |
| 2. 16S rDNA UNI-R (Amplification primer) | 5′-GTG TGA CGG GCG GTG TGT AC-3′ | |
| 3. 16S rDNA-533F | 5′-GTG CCA GCM GCC GCG GTA A-3′ | – |
| 4. 16S rDNA-907R (Sequencing primer) | 5′-CCG TCA ATT CMT TTG AGT TT-3′ | |
| 5. Gap-F | 5′-TCG AAG TTG TTG CAG TTA ACG A-3′ | 2 |
| 6. Gap-R | 5′-CCA TTC GTT GTC GTA CCA AG-3′ | |
| 7. ERIC1RF | 5′-ATG TAA GCT CCT GGG GAT TCA C-3′ | 3 |
| 8. ERIC2 | 5′-AAG TAA GTG ACT GGG GTG AGC-3′ | |
| 9. BOXA1R | 5′-CTA CGG CAA GGC GAC GCT GAC G-3′ | 3 |
| 10. (GTG)5 | 5′-GTG GTG GTG GTG GTG-3′ | 4 |
| 12. RAPD primer B | 5′- ATC TGG CAG C − 3′ | 5 |
| 13. fusA-F | 5′-GCT TCA TCA ACA AGA TGG AC-3′ | 6 |
| 14. fusA-R | 5′-CTC GAT TG CGA CGT GG AT-3′ | |
| 15. tuf-F | 5′-GGA CGG TGA TTG GAG AAG AAT GG-3′ | 7 |
| 16. tuf-R | 5′-CCA GGT TGA TTA CGC TCC AGA AGA-3′ | |
| 17. metG-F | 5′-GCC GGT TTT GGT GTT CC-3′ | 8 |
| 18. metG-R | 5′-GGC CAA ATC TGG GAA TGG-3′ | |
| 19. gyrA-F | 5′-CCA CCA GAT CGA GGT CAT C-3′ | 9 |
| 20. gyrA-R | 5′-TCG TCG GCA GTG AAA CGC A-3′ |
aPCR Program 1: ×1 (95 °C, 600 s), ×30 (95 °C, 30 s, 58 °C, 60 s, 72 °C, 60 s), ×1 (72 °C, 420 s). 2: ×1 (94 °C, 180 s), ×30 (94 °C, 30 s, 50 °C, 40 s, 72 °C, 60 s), ×1 (72 °C, 300 s). 3: ×1 (95 °C, 180 s), ×30 (94 °C, 30 s, 53 °C, 60 s, 70 °C, 480 s), ×1 (72 °C, 960 s). 4: ×1 (95 °C, 180 s), ×30 (94 °C, 30 s, 53 °C, 60 s, 70 °C, 180 s), ×1 (72 °C, 960 s). 5: ×1 (95 °C, 180 s), ×45 (94 °C, 15 s, 34 °C, 60 s, 70 °C, 120 s), ×1 (72 °C, 600 s). 6: ×1 (94 °C, 180 s), ×30 (94 °C, 45 s, 57 °C, 30 s, 72 °C, 90 s), ×1 (72 °C, 420 s). 7: ×1 (94 °C, 180 s), ×30 (94 °C, 45 s, 57 °C, 40 s, 72 °C, 60 s), ×1 (72 °C, 420 s). 8: ×1 (94 °C, 180 s), ×30 (94 °C, 45 s, 52 °C, 30 s, 72 °C, 90 s), ×1 (72 °C, 600 s). 9: ×1 (94 °C, 180 s), ×30 (94 °C, 45 s, 52 °C, 30 s, 72 °C, 90 s), ×1 (72 °C, 600 s)
Fig. 1Phylogenetic trees based on sequences of 16S rRNA (a) and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase encoding gene gap (b) of the three T. pyogenes strains of the present study and reference strains of the genra Trueperella and Arcanobacterium obtained from GenBank (NCBI). Trees were constructed using the maximum-likelihood method based on evolutionary distances calculated with the general time reversible model. Numbers at branch nodes represent the percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in bootstrap tests (1000 replicates). Only bootstrap values ≥70% are shown
Phenotypical and genotypical properties of the investigated T. pyogenes
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenotypical properties | |||||
| Hemolysis on sheep blood agar | + | + | + | + | + |
| Hemolysis on rabbit blood agar | + | + | + | + | + |
| CAMP-like reaction with: | |||||
|
| + | + | + | + | + |
|
| − | − | − | − | − |
|
| + | + | + | + | + |
| Reverse CAMP reaction | − | − | − | − | − |
| Nitrate reduction1 | − | − | − | − | − |
| Pyrazinamidase1 | − | − | − | − | − |
| Pyrrolidonyl arylamidase1 | + | + | + | + | + |
| Alkaline phosphatase1 | + | + | + | − | − |
| β-Glucuronidase (β-GUR)1,2,3 | + | + | + | + | + |
| α-Galactosidase (α-GAL)2 | − | − | − | − | − |
| β-Galactosidase (β-GAL)1,3 | + | + | + | + | + |
| α-Glucosidase (α-GLU)1,2,3 | + | + | + | + | + |
| β-Glucosidase (β-GLU) | − | − | − | − | − |
| N-acetyl- β-Glucosaminidase (β-NAG)1,3 | + | + | + | + | + |
| Esculin (β-Glucosidase)1 | − | − | − | − | − |
| Urease1 | − | − | − | − | − |
| Gelatine1,4 | − | − | − | + | + |
| Fermentation of: | |||||
| D-Glucose1 | + | + | + | + | + |
| D-Ribose1 | + | + | + | + | + |
| D-Xylose1 | + | + | + | + | + |
| D-Mannitol1 | − | − | − | − | − |
| D-Maltose1 | + | + | + | + | + |
| D-Lactose1 | + | + | + | + | + |
| Glycogen1 | + | + | + | + | − |
| α-Mannosidase2 | − | − | − | − | − |
| Catalase | − | − | − | − | − |
| Serolysis on Loeffler agar | + | + | + | + | + |
| Caseinase | + | + | + | + | + |
| Starch hydrolysis (amylase) | + | + | + | + | − |
| Cross reaction with streptococcal serogroup G specific antiserum | + | + | + | + | + |
| Genotypical properties | |||||
|
| + | + | + | + | + |
|
| + | + | + | + | + |
|
| + | + | + | + | + |
|
| + | + | + | + | + |
| Pyolysin encoding gene | + | + | + | + | + |
| Collagen-binding protein encoding gene | − | − | − | + | − |
| Neuraminidase H encoding gene | + | + | + | + | + |
| Neuraminidase P encoding gene | − | − | − | + | + |
| Fimbriae endoding gene | + | + | + | − | + |
| Fimbriae endoding gene | + | + | + | + | + |
| Fimbriae endoding gene | + | + | + | + | + |
| Tetracycline resistance encoding gene | + | + | + | +** | −** |
The reactions are shown as follows:* = synergistic CAMP-like reaction with staphylococcal β-hemolysin and Rhodococcus equi as indicator strains; ** = results mostly obtained from Eisenberg et al. [19]; +, positive reaction; −, negative reaction. 1 = Api-Coryne test system (Biomerieux, Nürtingen, Germany); 2 = tablets containing substrates (Rosco Diagnostica A/S, Taastrup, Denmark); 3 = 4-methylumbelliferyl conjugated substrates (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany)
Fig. 2Genomic fingerprint pattern of the three Grey Slender Lorises strains in comparison to T. pyogenes reference strains with three different (REP)-PCRs (ERIC-PCR, BOX-PCR, and (GTG)5–PCR) and random amplification polymorphic DNA (RAPD-PCR)
GenBank accession numbers of locus sequences of T. pyogenes strains obtained in this study
| Isolates and strains |
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| KJ605914 | HG941714 | HG941711 | HG941706 |
| 2 |
| KJ605913 | HG941713 | HG941710 | HG530074 |
| 3 |
| KJ605912 | HG941712 | HG941709 | HG941702 |
| 4 |
| KJ605911 | HG941716 | HG941708 | HG941704 |
| 5 |
| KJ605910 | HG941715 | HG941707 | HG941703 |
Fig. 3Phylogenetic analysis based on concatenated partial fusA-tuf-metG-gyrA nucleotide sequences of a total of 3314 nucleotide positions (a) and FusA-Tuf-MetG-GyrA amino acid sequences of a total of 1103 amino acid positions (b) of the three investigated target genes of the three T. pyogenes of Grey Slender Loris origin, T. pyogenes DSM 20594, T. pyogenes DSM 20630T and A. haemolyticum DSM 20595T. Trees were constructed using the maximum-likelihood method based on evolutionary distances calculated with the general time reversible model (for nucleotide sequences) or the JTT matrix-based method (for amino acid sequences). Numbers at branch nodes represent the percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in bootstrap tests (1000 replicates). Only bootstrap values ≥70% are shown
Average pairwise distances of the concatenated sequences of the investigated strains
| Isolates or strains | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| ||||||
| 2 |
| 0 | |||||
| 3 |
| 0 | 0 | ||||
| 4 |
| 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.010 | |||
| 5 |
| 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.012 | 0.010 | ||
| 6 |
| 0.249 | 0.249 | 0.249 | 0.25 | 0.249 |
Nucleotide percentage of the concatenated sequences for the four loci sequences
| Isolates and strains | T | C | A | G | G + C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 18.3 | 31.6 | 20.5 | 29.7 | 61.3 |
| 2 |
| 18.3 | 31.6 | 20.5 | 29.7 | 61.3 |
| 3 |
| 18.3 | 31.6 | 20.5 | 29.7 | 61.3 |
| 4 |
| 18.3 | 31.5 | 20.5 | 29.8 | 61.3 |
| 5 |
| 18.3 | 31.5 | 20.5 | 29.8 | 61.3 |
| 6 |
| 22.9 | 26.9 | 22.4 | 27.8 | 54.7 |
Matrix of the variable nucleotide positions of the concatenated sequences among the investigated strains
| Isolates and strains | Nucleotide position | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 1 |
|
|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
|
|
|
| 2 | 2 |
| 2 | 2 |
|
|
| 3 |
| 3 | ||||
|
|
|
| 0 | 2 |
|
|
| 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
|
|
|
| 0 | 1 |
| 7 | 7 |
|
|
| 2 |
| 3 | |
|
|
|
| 4 | 4 |
|
|
| 5 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
|
|
|
| 3 | 9 |
| 3 | 9 |
|
|
| 4 |
| 1 | |
|
|
|
| 4 | 2 |
|
|
| 7 | 8 | 5 | 8 | 6 |
|
|
|
| 1 | 9 |
| 3 | 6 |
|
|
| 6 |
| 6 | |
| (1) | T | C | T | C | T | A | T | G | C | T | A | A | T | C | C | T | A | C | C | T | C | C | T | A | T | C | T | C |
| (2) | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| (3) | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . | . |
| (4) | C | T | G | . | . | G | C | C | T | C | G | G | C | T | T | A | G | . | . | C | . | T | A | G | C | T | C | . |
| (5) | C | T | G | T | C | G | C | C | T | C | G | G | C | T | T | A | G | T | T | C | T | . | A | G | C | . | C | T |
| (6) | C | A | A | T | C | T | C | C | . | . | . | . | . | G | T | G | G | T | T | C | T | T | C | G | C | T | G | T |
aThe nucleotide positions in the three T. pyogenes from Grey Slender Lorises are identical and differ from other reference strains