Literature DB >> 28849353

Equivalent Treatment and Survival after Resection of Pancreatic Cancer at Safety-Net Hospitals.

Vikrom K Dhar1, Richard S Hoehn1, Young Kim1, Brent T Xia1, Andrew D Jung1, Dennis J Hanseman1, Syed A Ahmad1, Shimul A Shah2,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to disparities in access to care, patients with Medicaid or no health insurance are at risk of not receiving appropriate adjuvant treatment following resection of pancreatic cancer. We have previously shown inferior short-term outcomes following surgery at safety-net hospitals. Subsequently, we hypothesized that safety-net hospitals caring for these vulnerable populations utilize less adjuvant chemoradiation, resulting in inferior long-term outcomes.
METHODS: The American College of Surgeons National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (n = 32,296) from 1998 to 2010. Hospitals were grouped according to safety-net burden, defined as the proportion of patients with Medicaid or no insurance. The highest quartile, representing safety-net hospitals, was compared to lower-burden hospitals with regard to patient demographics, disease characteristics, surgical management, delivery of multimodal systemic therapy, and survival.
RESULTS: Patients at safety-net hospitals were less often white, had lower income, and were less educated. Safety-net hospital patients were just as likely to undergo surgical resection (OR 1.03, p = 0.73), achieving similar rates of negative surgical margins when compared to patients at medium and low burden hospitals (70% vs. 73% vs. 66%). Thirty-day mortality rates were 5.6% for high burden hospitals, 5.2% for medium burden hospitals, and 4.3% for low burden hospitals. No clinically significant differences were noted in the proportion of surgical patients receiving either chemotherapy (48% vs. 52% vs. 52%) or radiation therapy (26% vs. 30% vs. 29%) or the time between diagnosis and start of systemic therapy (58 days vs. 61 days vs. 53 days). Across safety-net burden groups, no difference was noted in stage-specific median survival (all p > 0.05) or receipt of adjuvant as opposed to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (82% vs. 85% vs. 85%). Multivariate analysis adjusting for cancer stage revealed no difference in survival for safety-net hospital patients who had surgery and survived > 30 days (HR 1.02, p = 0.63).
CONCLUSION: For patients surviving the perioperative setting following pancreatic cancer surgery, safety-net hospitals achieve equivalent long-term survival outcomes potentially due to equivalent delivery of multimodal therapy at non-safety-net hospitals. Safety-net hospitals are a crucial resource that provides quality long-term cancer treatment for vulnerable populations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreatic cancer; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Safety-net hospital; Whipple

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28849353     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3549-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  23 in total

1.  An automated model to identify heart failure patients at risk for 30-day readmission or death using electronic medical record data.

Authors:  Ruben Amarasingham; Billy J Moore; Ying P Tabak; Mark H Drazner; Christopher A Clark; Song Zhang; W Gary Reed; Timothy S Swanson; Ying Ma; Ethan A Halm
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Hospital financial condition and the quality of patient care.

Authors:  Gloria J Bazzoli; Hsueh-Fen Chen; Mei Zhao; Richard C Lindrooth
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Potentially Curable Pancreatic Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Alok A Khorana; Pamela B Mangu; Jordan Berlin; Anitra Engebretson; Theodore S Hong; Anirban Maitra; Supriya G Mohile; Matthew Mumber; Richard Schulick; Marc Shapiro; Susan Urba; Herbert J Zeh; Matthew H G Katz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Factors related to readmission after major elective surgery.

Authors:  Gregory C Wilson; R Cutler Quillin; Jeffrey M Sutton; Koffi Wima; Joshua J Shaw; Richard S Hoehn; Ian M Paquette; Daniel E Abbott; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  "Take the Volume Pledge" may result in disparity in access to care.

Authors:  Barbara A Blanco; Anai N Kothari; Robert H Blackwell; Sarah A Brownlee; Ryan M Yau; John P Attisha; Yoshiki Ezure; Sam Pappas; Paul C Kuo; Gerard J Abood
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 6.  Pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Audrey Vincent; Joseph Herman; Rich Schulick; Ralph H Hruban; Michael Goggins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Early hospital readmission after kidney transplantation: patient and center-level associations.

Authors:  M A McAdams-Demarco; M E Grams; E C Hall; J Coresh; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Fluorouracil vs gemcitabine chemotherapy before and after fluorouracil-based chemoradiation following resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  William F Regine; Kathryn A Winter; Ross A Abrams; Howard Safran; John P Hoffman; Andre Konski; Al B Benson; John S Macdonald; Mahesh R Kudrimoti; Mitchel L Fromm; Michael G Haddock; Paul Schaefer; Christopher G Willett; Tyvin A Rich
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Preoperative Modified FOLFIRINOX Treatment Followed by Capecitabine-Based Chemoradiation for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Trial A021101.

Authors:  Matthew H G Katz; Qian Shi; Syed A Ahmad; Joseph M Herman; Robert de W Marsh; Eric Collisson; Lawrence Schwartz; Wendy Frankel; Robert Martin; William Conway; Mark Truty; Hedy Kindler; Andrew M Lowy; Tanios Bekaii-Saab; Philip Philip; Mark Talamonti; Dana Cardin; Noelle LoConte; Perry Shen; John P Hoffman; Alan P Venook
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 14.766

10.  The impact of profitability of hospital admissions on mortality.

Authors:  Richard C Lindrooth; R Tamara Konetzka; Amol S Navathe; Jingsan Zhu; Wei Chen; Kevin Volpp
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.734

View more
  5 in total

1.  Management of glioblastoma at safety-net hospitals.

Authors:  Michael G Brandel; Robert C Rennert; Christian Lopez Ramos; David R Santiago-Dieppa; Jeffrey A Steinberg; Reith R Sarkar; Arvin R Wali; J Scott Pannell; James D Murphy; Alexander A Khalessi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Patient Factors Limit Colon Cancer Survival at Safety-Net Hospitals: A National Analysis.

Authors:  Katherine A Hrebinko; Caroline Rieser; Ibrahim Nassour; Samer Tohme; Lindsay M Sabik; Sidrah Khan; David S Medich; Amer H Zureikat; Richard S Hoehn
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 2.417

3.  Quality of Care and Outcomes of Patients With Gynecologic Malignancies Treated at Safety-Net Hospitals.

Authors:  Charlotte R Gamble; Yongmei Huang; Ana I Tergas; Fady Khoury-Collado; June Y Hou; Caryn M St Clair; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2019-06-07

4.  Treatment quality and outcomes vary with hospital burden of uninsured and Medicaid patients with cancer in early non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Zaid Muslim; Syed S Razi; Kostantinos Poulikidis; M Jawad Latif; Joanna F Weber; Cliff P Connery; Faiz Y Bhora
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-07-11

5.  Differences in receipt of multimodality therapy by race, insurance status, and socioeconomic disadvantage in patients with resected pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Scarlett Hao; Anastasios Mitsakos; William Irish; Janet Elizabeth Tuttle-Newhall; Alexander A Parikh; Rebecca A Snyder
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 2.885

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.