Aurelia Lugea1, Andreas Gerloff2, Hsin-Yuan Su3, Zhihong Xu4, Ariel Go3, Cheng Hu3, Samuel W French5, Jeremy S Wilson4, Minoti V Apte4, Richard T Waldron6, Stephen J Pandol6. 1. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System/University of California, Los Angeles, California. Electronic address: Aurelia.Lugea@cshs.org. 2. VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System/University of California, Los Angeles, California. 3. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California. 4. University of New South Wales, Liverpool, Australia; Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, Australia. 5. Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, California. 6. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System/University of California, Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Smoking, an independent risk factor for pancreatitis, accelerates the development of alcoholic pancreatitis. Alcohol feeding of mice induces up-regulation of spliced X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1s), which regulates the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) unfolded protein response and promotes cell survival upon ER stress. We examined whether smoking affects the adaptive mechanisms induced by alcohol and accelerates disorders of the ER in pancreatic acinar cells. METHODS: We studied the combined effects of ethanol (EtOH) and cigarette smoke extract (CSE) on ER stress and cell death responses in mouse and human primary acini and the acinar cell line AR42J. Cells were incubated with EtOH (50 mmol/L), CSE (20-40 μg/mL), or both (CSE+EtOH), and analyzed by immunoblotting, quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and cell death assays. Some cells were incubated with MKC-3946, an inhibitor of endoplasmic reticulum to nucleus signaling 1 (ERN1, also called IRE1) that blocks XBP1s formation. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were fed isocaloric amounts of an EtOH-containing (Lieber-DeCarli) or control diet for 11 weeks and exposed to cigarette smoke or room air in an exposure chamber for 2 hours each day. During the last 3 weeks, a subset of rats received intravenous injections of lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 3 mg/kg per week) to induce pancreatitis or saline (control). Pancreatic tissues were collected and analyzed by histology and immunostaining techniques. RESULTS: In AR42J and primary acini, CSE+EtOH induced cell death (necrosis and apoptosis), but neither agent alone had this effect. Cell death was associated with a significant decrease in expression of XBP1s. CSE+EtOH, but neither agent alone, slightly decreased adenosine triphosphate levels in AR42J cells, but induced oxidative stress and sustained activation (phosphorylation) of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha kinase 3 (EIF2AK3, also called PERK) and increased protein levels of DNA damage inducible transcript 3 (DDIT3, also called CHOP). CHOP regulates transcription to promote apoptosis. Incubation of AR42J or primary mouse or human acinar cells with MKC-3946 reduced expression of XBP1s, increased levels of CHOP, and induced cell death. In rats fed an EtOH diet, exposure to cigarette smoke increased ER stress in acinar cells and sensitized the pancreas to LPS-induced pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Cigarette smoke promotes cell death and features of pancreatitis in EtOH-sensitized acinar cells by suppressing the adaptive unfolded protein response signaling pathway. It also activates ER stress pathways that promote acinar cell death.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Smoking, an independent risk factor for pancreatitis, accelerates the development of alcoholic pancreatitis. Alcohol feeding of mice induces up-regulation of spliced X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1s), which regulates the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) unfolded protein response and promotes cell survival upon ER stress. We examined whether smoking affects the adaptive mechanisms induced by alcohol and accelerates disorders of the ER in pancreatic acinar cells. METHODS: We studied the combined effects of ethanol (EtOH) and cigarette smoke extract (CSE) on ER stress and cell death responses in mouse and human primary acini and the acinar cell line AR42J. Cells were incubated with EtOH (50 mmol/L), CSE (20-40 μg/mL), or both (CSE+EtOH), and analyzed by immunoblotting, quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, and cell death assays. Some cells were incubated with MKC-3946, an inhibitor of endoplasmic reticulum to nucleus signaling 1 (ERN1, also called IRE1) that blocks XBP1s formation. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were fed isocaloric amounts of an EtOH-containing (Lieber-DeCarli) or control diet for 11 weeks and exposed to cigarette smoke or room air in an exposure chamber for 2 hours each day. During the last 3 weeks, a subset of rats received intravenous injections of lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 3 mg/kg per week) to induce pancreatitis or saline (control). Pancreatic tissues were collected and analyzed by histology and immunostaining techniques. RESULTS: In AR42J and primary acini, CSE+EtOH induced cell death (necrosis and apoptosis), but neither agent alone had this effect. Cell death was associated with a significant decrease in expression of XBP1s. CSE+EtOH, but neither agent alone, slightly decreased adenosine triphosphate levels in AR42J cells, but induced oxidative stress and sustained activation (phosphorylation) of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha kinase 3 (EIF2AK3, also called PERK) and increased protein levels of DNA damage inducible transcript 3 (DDIT3, also called CHOP). CHOP regulates transcription to promote apoptosis. Incubation of AR42J or primary mouse or human acinar cells with MKC-3946 reduced expression of XBP1s, increased levels of CHOP, and induced cell death. In rats fed an EtOH diet, exposure to cigarette smoke increased ER stress in acinar cells and sensitized the pancreas to LPS-induced pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Cigarette smoke promotes cell death and features of pancreatitis in EtOH-sensitized acinar cells by suppressing the adaptive unfolded protein response signaling pathway. It also activates ER stress pathways that promote acinar cell death.
Authors: A M Reimold; N N Iwakoshi; J Manis; P Vallabhajosyula; E Szomolanyi-Tsuda; E M Gravallese; D Friend; M J Grusby; F Alt; L H Glimcher Journal: Nature Date: 2001-07-19 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jonathan H Lin; Han Li; Douglas Yasumura; Hannah R Cohen; Chao Zhang; Barbara Panning; Kevan M Shokat; Matthew M Lavail; Peter Walter Journal: Science Date: 2007-11-09 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Sophie Leclercq; Sébastien Matamoros; Patrice D Cani; Audrey M Neyrinck; François Jamar; Peter Stärkel; Karen Windey; Valentina Tremaroli; Fredrik Bäckhed; Kristin Verbeke; Philippe de Timary; Nathalie M Delzenne Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-10-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mukund P Srinivasan; Kamlesh K Bhopale; Anna A Caracheo; Samir M Amer; Shamis Khan; Lata Kaphalia; Gopalakrishnan Loganathan; Appakalai N Balamurugan; Bhupendra S Kaphalia Journal: Biochem Pharmacol Date: 2020-07-25 Impact factor: 5.858
Authors: Padmanabhan Srinivasan; Vignesh Ramesh; Jie Wu; Christopher Heskett; Brian D Chu; Hamid M Said Journal: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Date: 2019-09-04 Impact factor: 4.249
Authors: Anna S Gukovskaya; Fred S Gorelick; Guy E Groblewski; Olga A Mareninova; Aurelia Lugea; Laura Antonucci; Richard T Waldron; Aida Habtezion; Michael Karin; Stephen J Pandol; Ilya Gukovsky Journal: Pancreas Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Thiruvengadam Muniraj; Dhiraj Yadav; Judah N Abberbock; Samer Alkaade; Stephen T Amann; Michelle A Anderson; Peter A Banks; Randall E Brand; Darwin Conwell; Gregory A Cote; Christopher E Forsmark; Timothy B Gardner; Andres Gelrud; Nalini Guda; Michele D Lewis; Joseph Romagnuolo; Bimaljit S Sandhu; Stuart Sherman; Vikesh K Singh; Adam Slivka; Gong Tang; David C Whitcomb; C Mel Wilcox Journal: Pancreatology Date: 2019-02-26 Impact factor: 3.996
Authors: Savio George Barreto; Aida Habtezion; Anna Gukovskaya; Aurelia Lugea; Christie Jeon; Dhiraj Yadav; Peter Hegyi; Viktória Venglovecz; Robert Sutton; Stephen J Pandol Journal: Gut Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Mukund P Srinivasan; Kamlesh K Bhopale; Anna A Caracheo; Lata Kaphalia; Gopalakrishnan Loganathan; Appakalai N Balamurugan; Cristiana Rastellini; Bhupendra S Kaphalia Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2021-04-02 Impact factor: 3.455