Literature DB >> 28845412

Effects of Workout and Meditation Phenomenon Program on Body Composition, Flexibility, and Blood Pressure Data Analysis.

Eun-Ju Choi1, Wi-Young So2, Taikyeong Ted Jeong3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28845412      PMCID: PMC5563883     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Public Health        ISSN: 2251-6085            Impact factor:   1.429


× No keyword cloud information.

Dear Editor-in-Chief

Overall, 3.4 million deaths, loss of 3.9% of life years, and 3.8% of disability-adjusted life-years were estimated to be caused by overweight and obesity worldwide in 2010 (1). Moreover, the worldwide proportion of adults aged over 20 yr with a body-mass index (BMI) of 25 kg/m2 or greater has increased between 1980 and 2013, from 28.8% (95% uncertainty interval 28.4–29.3) to 36.9% (36.3–37.4) in men and from 29.8% (29.3–30.2) to 38.0% (37.5–38.5) in women (1). Obesity has become a major global health problem owing to the established health risks associated with it and their substantial increases in prevalence. Previous studies recommended encouraging regular exercise training for preventing chronic diseases such as obesity, hypertension, and diabetes (2–3). Regular exercise training such as dance and yoga programs is very popular and effective for preventing and treating chronic disease (4–5). However, only a few studies have investigated the effectiveness of dance and yoga programs (6). Therefore, this study aimed to examine the effects of dance and yoga programs on body composition, flexibility, and blood pressure in Korean college students. A total of 161 college students in Chungju in 2016, to undergo measurements of body composition, flexibility, and blood pressure were included in the study. They were classified into a dance group (male=54, female=58; age, 22.96±1.93 yr; height, 169.10±8.54 cm; weight, 63.53±11.80 kg) and a yoga group (male=10, female=39; age, 22.37±1.76 yr; height, 166.06±7.41 cm; weight, 59.55±12.45 kg). All of them provided written informed consent to participate in this study. The participants underwent body composition, flexibility, and blood pressure measurements before and after the intervention. The exercise groups participated in a dance and yoga program for 12 wk, respectively. The dance group participated in a dance program for 2 h once a week, for 12 wk, modified based on exercise (7). The yoga group participated in a yoga program for 2 h once a week, for 12 wk, modified based on the exercise protocol (8). The muscle mass, percent body fat, visceral fat area, and basal metabolic rate were measured using Inbody 720 equipment (Biospace, Seoul, Korea). Flexibility (sit-and-reach) and resting heart rate were measured based on the book recommendations (9). Blood pressure was measured 3 times at 2-min intervals. The nurse specialist then determined the mean blood pressure for each subject. All data are presented as mean±standard deviation. Paired t-tests were used to analyze differences between the dependent variables before and after the dance and yoga program, respectively. All analyses were performed using SPSS ver. 18.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. After the dance program, a significant improvement was seen in only the sit-and-reach movement (P<0.001) compared to that before the program. While after the yoga program, significant improvements were seen in both the sit-and-reach movement (P<0.001) and systolic blood pressure (P=0.003) (Table 1). Thus, 12-wk participation in the dance or yoga program might not be effective in improving body composition and blood pressure, except flexibility, in the Korean college students.
Table 1:

Changes in body composition, flexibility, and blood pressure after 12 wk of the dance (n=112) and yoga (n=49) program

VariablesGroupPrePosttP
Body mass index (kg/m2)Dance22.07±2.7822.03±2.810.6240.534
Yoga21.48±3.6621.58±3.51−0.3260.746
Muscle mass (kg)Dance45.44±9.0245.76±8.84−1.1490.253
Yoga41.52±7.6241.61±7.76−0.6580.514
Body fat (%)Dance22.04±5.8121.82±6.140.9520.343
Yoga24.14±5.8824.17±5.98−0.1290.898
Visceral fat area (cm2)Dance49.28±21.7148.25±21.231.4240.157
Yoga43.20±20.6743.33±22.01−0.1670.868
Basal metabolic rate (kcal)Dance1417.40±188.281418.88±188.06−0.7850.434
Yoga1324.14±154.551326.08±159.18−0.7750.442
Sit-and-reach (cm)Dance12.12±8.3515.15±8.64−6.629<0.001***
Yoga11.18±8.2317.92±7.07−9.551<0.001***
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)Dance123.78±14.61119.47±13.653.0010.003**
Yoga116.59±11.37117.10±12.23−0.5220.604
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)Dance75.43±12.6773.19±9.131.9240.057
Yoga70.12±8.1770.69±8.62−0.3170.753
Resting heart rate (beats/min)Dance80.90±13.1281.46±12.30−0.5000.618
Yoga77.88±9.8880.31±10.23−1.7760.082

Data are presented as means±standard deviations

P<0.01,

P<0.001; tested by paired t-tests

Changes in body composition, flexibility, and blood pressure after 12 wk of the dance (n=112) and yoga (n=49) program Data are presented as means±standard deviations P<0.01, P<0.001; tested by paired t-tests
  8 in total

1.  Effects of Hatha yoga and African dance on perceived stress, affect, and salivary cortisol.

Authors:  Jeremy West; Christian Otte; Kathleen Geher; Joe Johnson; David C Mohr
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2004-10

Review 2.  Effect of dance therapy on blood pressure and exercise capacity of individuals with hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lino Sergio Rocha Conceição; Mansueto Gomes Neto; Mayra Alves Soares do Amaral; Paulo Ricardo Saquete Martins-Filho; Vitor Oliveira Carvalho
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-26       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 3.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of yoga on weight-related outcomes.

Authors:  Romy Lauche; Jost Langhorst; Myeong Soo Lee; Gustav Dobos; Holger Cramer
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Effect of height on motor coordination in college students participating in a dancesport program.

Authors:  Xiaoxin Li; Huazhuo Wang; Yaohua Yang; Chunying Qi; Fei Wang; Man Jin
Journal:  Med Probl Perform Art       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.106

Review 5.  Exercise and the cardiovascular system: clinical science and cardiovascular outcomes.

Authors:  Carl J Lavie; Ross Arena; Damon L Swift; Neil M Johannsen; Xuemei Sui; Duck-Chul Lee; Conrad P Earnest; Timothy S Church; James H O'Keefe; Richard V Milani; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 17.367

Review 6.  Physical exercise as non-pharmacological treatment of chronic pain: Why and when.

Authors:  Kirsten R Ambrose; Yvonne M Golightly
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 4.098

7.  Randomised controlled trial of a 12 week yoga intervention on negative affective states, cardiovascular and cognitive function in post-cardiac rehabilitation patients.

Authors:  Alan Yeung; Hosen Kiat; A Robert Denniss; Birinder S Cheema; Alan Bensoussan; Bianca Machliss; Ben Colagiuri; Dennis Chang
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.659

8.  Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Authors:  Marie Ng; Tom Fleming; Margaret Robinson; Blake Thomson; Nicholas Graetz; Christopher Margono; Erin C Mullany; Stan Biryukov; Cristiana Abbafati; Semaw Ferede Abera; Jerry P Abraham; Niveen M E Abu-Rmeileh; Tom Achoki; Fadia S AlBuhairan; Zewdie A Alemu; Rafael Alfonso; Mohammed K Ali; Raghib Ali; Nelson Alvis Guzman; Walid Ammar; Palwasha Anwari; Amitava Banerjee; Simon Barquera; Sanjay Basu; Derrick A Bennett; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Jed Blore; Norberto Cabral; Ismael Campos Nonato; Jung-Chen Chang; Rajiv Chowdhury; Karen J Courville; Michael H Criqui; David K Cundiff; Kaustubh C Dabhadkar; Lalit Dandona; Adrian Davis; Anand Dayama; Samath D Dharmaratne; Eric L Ding; Adnan M Durrani; Alireza Esteghamati; Farshad Farzadfar; Derek F J Fay; Valery L Feigin; Abraham Flaxman; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Atsushi Goto; Mark A Green; Rajeev Gupta; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Graeme J Hankey; Heather C Harewood; Rasmus Havmoeller; Simon Hay; Lucia Hernandez; Abdullatif Husseini; Bulat T Idrisov; Nayu Ikeda; Farhad Islami; Eiman Jahangir; Simerjot K Jassal; Sun Ha Jee; Mona Jeffreys; Jost B Jonas; Edmond K Kabagambe; Shams Eldin Ali Hassan Khalifa; Andre Pascal Kengne; Yousef Saleh Khader; Young-Ho Khang; Daniel Kim; Ruth W Kimokoti; Jonas M Kinge; Yoshihiro Kokubo; Soewarta Kosen; Gene Kwan; Taavi Lai; Mall Leinsalu; Yichong Li; Xiaofeng Liang; Shiwei Liu; Giancarlo Logroscino; Paulo A Lotufo; Yuan Lu; Jixiang Ma; Nana Kwaku Mainoo; George A Mensah; Tony R Merriman; Ali H Mokdad; Joanna Moschandreas; Mohsen Naghavi; Aliya Naheed; Devina Nand; K M Venkat Narayan; Erica Leigh Nelson; Marian L Neuhouser; Muhammad Imran Nisar; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Samuel O Oti; Andrea Pedroza; Dorairaj Prabhakaran; Nobhojit Roy; Uchechukwu Sampson; Hyeyoung Seo; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Kenji Shibuya; Rahman Shiri; Ivy Shiue; Gitanjali M Singh; Jasvinder A Singh; Vegard Skirbekk; Nicolas J C Stapelberg; Lela Sturua; Bryan L Sykes; Martin Tobias; Bach X Tran; Leonardo Trasande; Hideaki Toyoshima; Steven van de Vijver; Tommi J Vasankari; J Lennert Veerman; Gustavo Velasquez-Melendez; Vasiliy Victorovich Vlassov; Stein Emil Vollset; Theo Vos; Claire Wang; XiaoRong Wang; Elisabete Weiderpass; Andrea Werdecker; Jonathan L Wright; Y Claire Yang; Hiroshi Yatsuya; Jihyun Yoon; Seok-Jun Yoon; Yong Zhao; Maigeng Zhou; Shankuan Zhu; Alan D Lopez; Christopher J L Murray; Emmanuela Gakidou
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 79.321

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.