Markus Wallwiener1, Felix Heindl2, Sara Y Brucker3, Florin-Andrei Taran3, Andreas Hartkopf3, Friedrich Overkamp4, Hans-Christian Kolberg5, Peyman Hadji6, Hans Tesch7, Johannes Ettl8, Michael P Lux2, Claudia Rauh2, Simon Blum2, Naiba Nabieva2, Tobias F Brodkorb2, Cornelia Faschingbauer2, Hanna Langemann2, Carla Schulmeyer2, Bernhard Volz2, Matthias Rübner2,9, Diana Lüftner10, Volkmar Müller11, Erik Belleville12, Wolfgang Janni13, Tanja N Fehm14, Diethelm Wallwiener3, Thomas Ganslandt15, Matthias W Beckmann2, Andreas Schneeweiss1,16, Peter A Fasching2, Paul Gass2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 2. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. 4. Outpatient Department of Hematology and Oncology, Recklinghausen, Germany. 5. Marienhospital Bottrop, Bottrop, Germany. 6. Nordwest Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany. 7. Onkologie Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany. 8. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 9. Institut für Frauengesundheit (IFG), Erlangen, Germany. 10. Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany. 11. Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany. 12. Clin-Sol Ltd., Würzburg, Germany. 13. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany. 14. Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heinrich Heine University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. 15. Chair of Medical Informatics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. 16. National Center for Tumor Diseases and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been incorporated into clinical trials for many symptoms and medical conditions. A transition from paper-based capture of PROs to electronic PROs (ePROs) has recently started. This study reports on the feasibility of ePRO assessment in a prospective registry including molecular data for patients with advanced breast cancer. METHODS: As part of the PRAEGNANT network, patients were invited by clinical trial staff, physicians, and nurses to complete three standardized Internet-based questionnaires (EQ 5D 5 L, CES-D and IPAQ). Feasibility was assessed by the staff members who assigned the user accounts by the patients. The completeness of the questionnaires was also assessed. RESULTS: Fifteen of 17 patients who were asked agreed to participate to complete the PRO questionnaires (EQ-5D-5L and CES-D). However, the IPAQ (physical activity) questionnaire was only validly completed by 9 patients. Feasibility was ranked better by the physicians and dedicated clinical trial staff than by the nursing staff. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating ePRO questionnaires into an advanced breast cancer registry is feasible, and no major hurdles were reported. Involving stakeholders from the start, the application is tailored to the capacities and abilities of both patients and clinical staff. The patients' compliance was better with some questionnaires, but others may present difficulties.
PURPOSE:Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been incorporated into clinical trials for many symptoms and medical conditions. A transition from paper-based capture of PROs to electronic PROs (ePROs) has recently started. This study reports on the feasibility of ePRO assessment in a prospective registry including molecular data for patients with advanced breast cancer. METHODS: As part of the PRAEGNANT network, patients were invited by clinical trial staff, physicians, and nurses to complete three standardized Internet-based questionnaires (EQ 5D 5 L, CES-D and IPAQ). Feasibility was assessed by the staff members who assigned the user accounts by the patients. The completeness of the questionnaires was also assessed. RESULTS: Fifteen of 17 patients who were asked agreed to participate to complete the PRO questionnaires (EQ-5D-5L and CES-D). However, the IPAQ (physical activity) questionnaire was only validly completed by 9 patients. Feasibility was ranked better by the physicians and dedicated clinical trial staff than by the nursing staff. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating ePRO questionnaires into an advanced breast cancer registry is feasible, and no major hurdles were reported. Involving stakeholders from the start, the application is tailored to the capacities and abilities of both patients and clinical staff. The patients' compliance was better with some questionnaires, but others may present difficulties.
Entities:
Keywords:
breast cancer; compliance; electronic data capture; patient-reported outcomes; quality of life
Authors: José Baselga; Mario Campone; Martine Piccart; Howard A Burris; Hope S Rugo; Tarek Sahmoud; Shinzaburo Noguchi; Michael Gnant; Kathleen I Pritchard; Fabienne Lebrun; J Thaddeus Beck; Yoshinori Ito; Denise Yardley; Ines Deleu; Alejandra Perez; Thomas Bachelot; Luc Vittori; Zhiying Xu; Pabak Mukhopadhyay; David Lebwohl; Gabriel N Hortobagyi Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A Ruiz-Casado; L B Alejo; A Santos-Lozano; A Soria; M J Ortega; I Pagola; C Fiuza-Luces; I Palomo; N Garatachea; H Cebolla; A Lucia Journal: Int J Sports Med Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 3.118
Authors: F Siedentopf; I Utz-Billing; S Gairing; W Schoenegg; H Kentenich; I Kollak Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Alexander Hein; Paul Gass; Christina Barbara Walter; Florin-Andrei Taran; Andreas Hartkopf; Friedrich Overkamp; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Peyman Hadji; Hans Tesch; Johannes Ettl; Rachel Wuerstlein; Debra Lounsbury; Michael P Lux; Diana Lüftner; Markus Wallwiener; Volkmar Müller; Erik Belleville; Wolfgang Janni; Tanja N Fehm; Diethelm Wallwiener; Thomas Ganslandt; Matthias Ruebner; Matthias W Beckmann; Andreas Schneeweiss; Peter A Fasching; Sara Y Brucker Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Diana Lüftner; Andreas D Hartkopf; Michael P Lux; Friedrich Overkamp; Hans Tesch; Adriana Titzmann; Patrik Pöschke; Markus Wallwiener; Volkmar Müller; Matthias W Beckmann; Erik Belleville; Wolfgang Janni; Tanja N Fehm; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Johannes Ettl; Diethelm Wallwiener; Andreas Schneeweiss; Sara Y Brucker; Peter A Fasching Journal: Breast Care (Basel) Date: 2021-03-16 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Michael P Lux; Wolfgang Janni; Andreas D Hartkopf; Naiba Nabieva; Florin-Andrei Taran; Friedrich Overkamp; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Peyman Hadji; Hans Tesch; Johannes Ettl; Jens B Huober; Diana Lüftner; Markus Wallwiener; Volkmar Müller; Matthias W Beckmann; Erik Belleville; Tanja N Fehm; Diethelm Wallwiener; Sara Y Brucker; Andreas Schneeweiss; Peter A Fasching Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2017-12-18 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Andreas Schneeweiss; Michael P Lux; Wolfgang Janni; Andreas D Hartkopf; Naiba Nabieva; Florin-Andrei Taran; Friedrich Overkamp; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Peyman Hadji; Hans Tesch; Achim Wöckel; Johannes Ettl; Diana Lüftner; Markus Wallwiener; Volkmar Müller; Matthias W Beckmann; Erik Belleville; Diethelm Wallwiener; Sara Y Brucker; Florian Schütz; Peter A Fasching; Tanja N Fehm Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2018-03-21 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Jolie N Haun; Amy C Alman; Christine Melillo; Maisha Standifer; Julie McMahon-Grenz; Marlena Shin; W A Lapcevic; Nitin Patel; A Rani Elwy Journal: JMIR Med Inform Date: 2020-06-26
Authors: Volkmar Müller; Achim Wöckel; Michael P Lux; Wolfgang Janni; Andreas D Hartkopf; Naiba Nabieva; Florin-Andrei Taran; Peyman Hadji; Hans Tesch; Johannes Ettl; Diana Lüftner; Manfred Welslau; Erik Belleville; Sara Y Brucker; Florian Schütz; Peter A Fasching; Tanja N Fehm; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Andreas Schneeweiss; Friedrich Overkamp Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 2.915
Authors: Stephanie Stangl; Kirsten Haas; Felizitas A Eichner; Anna Grau; Udo Selig; Timo Ludwig; Tanja Fehm; Tanja Stüber; Asarnusch Rashid; Alexander Kerscher; Ralf Bargou; Silke Hermann; Volker Arndt; Martin Meyer; Manfred Wildner; Hermann Faller; Michael G Schrauder; Michael Weigel; Ulrich Schlembach; Peter U Heuschmann; Achim Wöckel Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2020-02-04
Authors: Kerstin A Kessel; Marco M E Vogel; Carmen Kessel; Henning Bier; Tilo Biedermann; Helmut Friess; Peter Herschbach; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Bernhard Meyer; Marion Kiechle; Ulrich Keller; Christian Peschel; Florian Bassermann; Roland Schmid; Markus Schwaiger; Stephanie E Combs Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2018-10-04
Authors: Lina Maria Matthies; Florin-Andrei Taran; Joachim Graf; Markus Wallwiener; Lucia Keilmann; Andreas Schneeweiss; Elisabeth Simoes; Andreas D Hartkopf; Alexander N Sokolov; Christina B Walter; Nina Sickenberger; Stephanie Wallwiener; Manuel Feisst; Paul Gass; Michael P Lux; Florian Schuetz; Peter A Fasching; Christof Sohn; Sara Y Brucker Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Manfred Welslau; Andreas D Hartkopf; Volkmar Müller; Achim Wöckel; Michael P Lux; Wolfgang Janni; Johannes Ettl; Diana Lüftner; Erik Belleville; Florian Schütz; Peter A Fasching; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Naiba Nabieva; Friedrich Overkamp; Florin-Andrei Taran; Sara Y Brucker; Markus Wallwiener; Hans Tesch; Andreas Schneeweiss; Tanja N Fehm Journal: Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Date: 2019-10-22 Impact factor: 2.915