Literature DB >> 28844460

Barriers to the implementation and uptake of simulation-based training programs in general surgery: a multinational qualitative study.

Shady G Hosny1, Maximilian J Johnston2, Philip H Pucher2, Simon Erridge2, Ara Darzi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence demonstrating the advantages of simulation training in general surgery, it is not widely integrated into surgical training programs worldwide. The aim of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to the implementation and uptake of surgical simulation training programs.
METHODS: A multinational qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured interviews of general surgical residents and experts. Each interview was audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and underwent emergent theme analysis. All data were anonymized and results pooled.
RESULTS: A total of 37 individuals participated in the study. Seventeen experts (Program Directors and Surgical Attendings with an interest in surgical education) and 20 residents drawn from the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, France, and Japan were interviewed. Barriers to simulation-based training were identified based on key themes including financial cost, access, and translational benefit. Participants described cost (89%) and access (76%) as principal barriers to uptake. Common facilitators included a mandatory requirement to complete simulation training (78%) and on-going assessment of skills (78%). Participants felt that simulation training could improve patient outcomes (76%) but identified a lack of evidence to demonstrate benefit (38%). There was a consensus that simulation training has not been widely implemented (70%).
CONCLUSIONS: There are multiple barriers to the implementation of surgical simulation training programs, however, there is agreement that these programs could potentially improve patient outcomes. Identifying these barriers enable the targeted use of facilitators to deliver simulation training programs.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Education; Simulation; Surgery; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28844460     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.07.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  9 in total

1.  Simulation capacity building in rural Indian hospitals: a 1-year follow-up qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Veena Sheshadri; Isaac Wasserman; Nandakumar Menon; Alexander W Peters; Vatshalan Santhirapala; Shivani Mitra; Simone Sandler; Emma Svensson; David Ljungman; Regi George; Arundhathi Ambepu; Jithendranath Krishnan; Raman Kataria; Salim Afshar; John G Meara; Jerome T Galea; Peter Weinstock; Christopher Roussin; Matthew Taylor; Craig D McClain
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2020-08-13

Review 2.  Role of Digital Resources in Minimally Invasive Colorectal Surgery Training.

Authors:  Heidi Paine; Manish Chand
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-03-29

3.  Trainee and trainer experiences and recommendations for plastic surgery training: A qualitative pilot study.

Authors:  Lilli Cooper; Asmat H Din; Edmund Fitzgerald O'Connor; Victoria Rose; Paul Roblin; Maleeha Mughal
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2021-11-10

4.  Development and Learner-Based Assessment of a Novel, Customized, 3D Printed Small Bowel Simulator for Hand-Sewn Anastomosis Training.

Authors:  Merieme Habti; Florence Bénard; Artur Arutiunian; Simon Bérubé; Dominic Cadoret; Léamarie Meloche-Dumas; Andrei Torres; Bill Kapralos; Frédéric Mercier; Adam Dubrowski; Erica Patocskai
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-12-20

5.  Designing a synthetic simulator to teach open surgical skills for limb exploration in trauma: a qualitative study exploring the experiences and perspectives of educators and surgical trainees.

Authors:  L Heskin; C Simms; O Traynor; R Galvin
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 6.  Developing a simulation-based training curriculum in transesophageal ultrasound with the use of the endobronchial ultrasound-endoscope.

Authors:  Leizl Joy Nayahangan; Paul Frost Clementsen; Alison Doubleday; Janet Riddle; Jouke T Annema; Lars Konge
Journal:  Endosc Ultrasound       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.275

7.  The impact of virtual reality simulation training on operative performance in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Gemma Humm; Helen Mohan; Christina Fleming; Rhiannon Harries; Christopher Wood; Khaled Dawas; Danail Stoyanov; Laurence B Lovat
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-07-07

8.  Experiences and Perceptions of Ophthalmic Simulation-Based Surgical Education in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Roxanne Annoh; Lena Morgon Banks; Stephen Gichuhi; John Buchan; William Makupa; Juliet Otiti; Agrippa Mukome; Simon Arunga; Matthew J Burton; William H Dean
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.891

9.  [Use of surgical simulators in further education-A nationwide analysis in Germany].

Authors:  Stefanie Brunner; Juliane Kröplin; Hans-Joachim Meyer; Thomas Schmitz-Rixen; Tobias Fritz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 0.955

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.