Literature DB >> 28844231

What Defines a High-Performing Health Care Delivery System: A Systematic Review.

Sangeeta C Ahluwalia, Cheryl L Damberg, Marissa Silverman, Aneesa Motala, Paul G Shekelle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Purchasers, payers, and policy makers are increasingly measuring and rewarding high-performing health systems, which use a variety of definitions of high performance, yet it is unclear if a consistently applied definition exists. A systematic review was conducted to determine if there is a commonly used, agreed-on definition of what constitutes a "high-performing" health care delivery system.
METHODS: Searches were conducted for English-language articles defining high performance with respect to a health care system or organization in PubMed and WorldCat databases from 2005 to 2015 and the New York Academy of Medicine Grey Literature Report from 1999 to 2016. The entity/condition to which the definition was applied was extracted from included articles. The number and type of dimensions used to define high performance within and across articles was tabulated and the number and type of metrics used by performance dimension and by article was calculated.
RESULTS: No consistent definition of a high-performing health care system or organization was identified. High performance was variably defined across different dimensions, including quality (93% of articles), cost (67%), access (35%), equity (26%), patient experience (21%), and patient safety (18%). Most articles used more than one dimension to define high performance (75%), but only five used five or more dimensions. The most commonly paired dimensions were quality and cost (63%).
CONCLUSION: The absence of a consistent definition of what constitutes high performance and how to measure it hinders our ability to compare and reward health care delivery systems on performance, underscoring the need to develop a consistent definition of high performance.
Copyright © 2017 The Joint Commission. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28844231     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf        ISSN: 1553-7250


  6 in total

1.  Barriers to using clinical decision support in ambulatory care: Do clinics in health systems fare better?

Authors:  Yunfeng Shi; Alejandro Amill-Rosario; Robert S Rudin; Shira H Fischer; Paul Shekelle; Dennis P Scanlon; Cheryl L Damberg
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework.

Authors:  Jean-Frederic Levesque; Kim Sutherland
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 3.  The Role of Value Stream Mapping in Healthcare Services: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Juan A Marin-Garcia; Pilar I Vidal-Carreras; Julio J Garcia-Sabater
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Assessment of Barriers and Facilitators to the Delivery of Care for Noncommunicable Diseases by Nonphysician Health Workers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Analysis.

Authors:  David J Heller; Anirudh Kumar; Sandeep P Kishore; Carol R Horowitz; Rohina Joshi; Rajesh Vedanthan
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-12-02

Review 5.  Public health system challenges in the Free State, South Africa: a situation appraisal to inform health system strengthening.

Authors:  B Malakoane; J C Heunis; P Chikobvu; N G Kigozi; W H Kruger
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Using Consistently Low Performance to Identify Low-Quality Physician Groups.

Authors:  Christina A Nguyen; Lauren G Gilstrap; Michael E Chernew; J Michael McWilliams; Bruce E Landon; Mary Beth Landrum
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-07-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.