Megan A Adams1, Katherine M Prenovost2, Jason A Dominitz3, Robert G Holleman2, Eve A Kerr4, Sarah L Krein4, Sameer D Saini5, Joel H Rubenstein5. 1. Center for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: meganada@med.umich.edu. 2. Center for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington; Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington. 4. Center for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Division of General Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 5. Center for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Use of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) for gastrointestinal endoscopy has increased in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) as in fee-for-service environments, despite the absence of financial incentives. We investigated factors associated with use of MAC in an integrated health care delivery system with a capitated payment model. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using multilevel logistic regression, with MAC use modeled as a function of procedure year, patient- and provider-level factors, and facility effects. We collected data from 2,091,590 veterans who underwent outpatient esophagogastroduodenoscopy and/or colonoscopy during fiscal years 2000-2013 at 133 facilities. RESULTS: The adjusted rate of MAC use in the VHA increased 17% per year (odds ratio for increase, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.27) from fiscal year 2000 through 2013. The most rapid increase occurred starting in 2011. VHA use of MAC was associated with patient-level factors that included obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, higher comorbidity, and use of prescription opioids and/or benzodiazepines, although the magnitude of these effects was small. Provider-level and facility factors were also associated with use of MAC, although again the magnitude of these associations was small. Unmeasured facility-level effects had the greatest effect on the trend of MAC use. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective study of veterans who underwent outpatient esophagogastroduodenoscopy and/or colonoscopy from fiscal year 2000 through 2013, we found that even in a capitated system, patient factors are only weakly associated with use of MAC. Facility-level effects are the most prominent factor influencing increasing use of MAC. Future studies should focus on better defining the role of MAC and facility and organizational factors that affect choice of endoscopic sedation. It will also be important to align resources and incentives to promote appropriate allocation of MAC based on clinically meaningful patient factors.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Use of monitored anesthesia care (MAC) for gastrointestinal endoscopy has increased in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) as in fee-for-service environments, despite the absence of financial incentives. We investigated factors associated with use of MAC in an integrated health care delivery system with a capitated payment model. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using multilevel logistic regression, with MAC use modeled as a function of procedure year, patient- and provider-level factors, and facility effects. We collected data from 2,091,590 veterans who underwent outpatient esophagogastroduodenoscopy and/or colonoscopy during fiscal years 2000-2013 at 133 facilities. RESULTS: The adjusted rate of MAC use in the VHA increased 17% per year (odds ratio for increase, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.27) from fiscal year 2000 through 2013. The most rapid increase occurred starting in 2011. VHA use of MAC was associated with patient-level factors that included obesity, obstructive sleep apnea, higher comorbidity, and use of prescription opioids and/or benzodiazepines, although the magnitude of these effects was small. Provider-level and facility factors were also associated with use of MAC, although again the magnitude of these associations was small. Unmeasured facility-level effects had the greatest effect on the trend of MAC use. CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective study of veterans who underwent outpatient esophagogastroduodenoscopy and/or colonoscopy from fiscal year 2000 through 2013, we found that even in a capitated system, patient factors are only weakly associated with use of MAC. Facility-level effects are the most prominent factor influencing increasing use of MAC. Future studies should focus on better defining the role of MAC and facility and organizational factors that affect choice of endoscopic sedation. It will also be important to align resources and incentives to promote appropriate allocation of MAC based on clinically meaningful patient factors.
Authors: Sandeep R Das; Linda S Kinsinger; William S Yancy; Anthea Wang; Eileen Ciesco; Mary Burdick; Steven J Yevich Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Nancy E Morden; Jeffrey C Munson; Carrie H Colla; Jonathan S Skinner; Julie P W Bynum; Weiping Zhou; Ellen Meara Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Jason A Dominitz; Laura-Mae Baldwin; Pamela Green; William I Kreuter; Cynthia W Ko Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2012-10-25 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Othman Alharbi; Linda Rabeneck; Lawrence F Paszat; Duminda N Wijeysundera; Rinku Sutradhar; Lingsong Yun; Christopher M Vinden; Jill Tinmouth Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Megan A Adams; Joel H Rubenstein; Rachel Lipson; Robert G Holleman; Sameer D Saini Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-03-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Fahima Dossa; Catherine Dubé; Jill Tinmouth; Anne Sorvari; Linda Rabeneck; Bronwen R McCurdy; Jason A Dominitz; Nancy N Baxter Journal: BMJ Open Gastroenterol Date: 2020-02-16