Literature DB >> 20630511

Projected increased growth rate of anesthesia professional-delivered sedation for colonoscopy and EGD in the United States: 2009 to 2015.

John M Inadomi1, Candace L Gunnarsson, John A Rizzo, Hai Fang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia professional-delivered sedation has become increasingly common when performing colonoscopy and EGD.
OBJECTIVE: To provide an estimate of anesthesia professional-participation rates in colonoscopy and EGD procedures and to examine rate changes over time and geographic variations for both procedures.
DESIGN: Retrospective sample design.
SETTING: National survey data from i3 Innovus for the period 2003 to 2007 on the use rate of anesthesia professionals in both procedures. PATIENTS: A sample of 3688 observations included 3-digit zip code-level information on anesthesia professional use rates.
INTERVENTIONS: Data were linked to the Bureau of Health Professions' Area Resource File to control for sociodemographic factors and provider supply characteristics for anesthesia professional use rates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify factors predicting the use rate of anesthesia professionals in these procedures and to forecast use rates for the years 2009 to 2015.
RESULTS: For colonoscopy and EGD, anesthesia professional participation is projected to grow from 23.9% and 24.4% in 2007 to 53.4% and 52.9% by 2015, respectively. Average growth rates were highest in the northeast for colonoscopy (145.8%) and EGD (146.6%). Anesthesia professional use rates were significantly greater in areas having a higher percentage of older subjects (45 years and older), higher per capita income and lower unemployment rates, and higher per capita inpatient admissions and were significantly lower in areas having more per capita outpatient visits for both procedures. LIMITATIONS: Nonexperimental retrospective sample study design. Database sample may not be nationally representative. Market area characteristics were used to control for socioeconomic and demographic factors. However, there may remain some important market factors that we were unable to control.
CONCLUSIONS: Anesthesia professional-delivered sedation is projected to grow substantially for both procedures. Copyright 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20630511     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.04.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  34 in total

1.  Deep sedation or general anesthesia for ERCP?

Authors:  Nirav Thosani; Subhas Banerjee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Editorial: Endoscopic Sedation: Who, Which, When?

Authors:  John M Inadomi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Non-anesthesiologist administered propofol with or without midazolam for moderate sedation-the problem is not "which regimen" but "who's regimen".

Authors:  Suck-Ho Lee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Use of anesthesia on the rise in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Basil Al-Awabdy; C Mel Wilcox
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2013-01-16

5.  A Systematic Review of Factors Associated With Utilization of Monitored Anesthesia Care for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors:  Megan A Adams; Ashraf Saleh; Joel H Rubenstein
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2016-06

6.  Anesthetist-Directed Sedation Favors Success of Advanced Endoscopic Procedures.

Authors:  James Buxbaum; Nitzan Roth; Nima Motamedi; Terrance Lee; Paul Leonor; Mark Salem; Dolores Gibbs; John Vargo
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Predictors of Use of Monitored Anesthesia Care for Outpatient Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in a Capitated Payment System.

Authors:  Megan A Adams; Katherine M Prenovost; Jason A Dominitz; Robert G Holleman; Eve A Kerr; Sarah L Krein; Sameer D Saini; Joel H Rubenstein
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 22.682

8.  Dual-Continuum Design Approach for Intuitive and Low-Cost Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Authors:  Nicolo Garbin; Long Wang; James H Chandler; Keith L Obstein; Nabil Simaan; P Valdastri
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Complications following colonoscopy with anesthesia assistance: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Gregory S Cooper; Tzuyung D Kou; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Anesthesia Service Use During Outpatient Gastroenterology Procedures Continued to Increase From 2010 to 2013 and Potentially Discretionary Spending Remained High.

Authors:  Zachary Predmore; Xiaoyu Nie; Regan Main; Soeren Mattke; Hangsheng Liu
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.