Literature DB >> 28843690

Process efficiency of casein separation from milk using polymeric spiral-wound microfiltration membranes.

D Mercier-Bouchard1, S Benoit1, A Doyen1, M Britten2, Y Pouliot3.   

Abstract

Microfiltration is largely used to separate casein micelles from milk serum proteins (SP) to produce a casein-enriched retentate for cheese making and a permeate enriched in native SP. Skim milk microfiltration is typically performed with ceramic membranes and little information is available about the efficiency of spiral-wound (SW) membranes. We determined the effect of SW membrane pore size (0.1 and 0.2 µm) on milk protein separation in total recirculation mode with a transmembrane pressure gradient to evaluate the separation efficiency of milk proteins and energy consumption after repeated concentration and diafiltration (DF). Results obtained in total recirculation mode demonstrated that pore size diameter had no effect on the permeate flux, but a drastic loss of casein was observed in permeate for the 0.2-µm SW membrane. Concentration-DF experiments (concentration factor of 3.0× with 2 sequential DF) were performed with the optimal 0.1-µm SW membrane. We compared these results to previous data we generated with the 0.1-µm graded permeability (GP) membrane. Whereas casein rejection was similar for both membranes, SP rejection was higher for the 0.1-µm SW membrane (rejection coefficient of 0.75 to 0.79 for the 0.1-µm SW membrane versus 0.46 to 0.49 for the GP membrane). The 0.1-µm SW membrane consumed less energy (0.015-0.024 kWh/kg of permeate collected) than the GP membrane (0.077-0.143 kWh/kg of permeate collected). A techno-economic evaluation led us to conclude that the 0.1-µm SW membranes may represent a better option to concentrate casein for cheese milk; however, the GP membrane has greater permeability and its longer lifetime (about 10 yr) potentially makes it an interesting option.
Copyright © 2017 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  energy consumption; membrane fouling; microfiltration; polymeric spiral-wound membrane; process efficiency; skim milk

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28843690     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2017-13015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  3 in total

1.  On the Use of Ultrafiltration or Microfiltration Polymeric Spiral-Wound Membranes for Cheesemilk Standardization: Impact on Process Efficiency.

Authors:  Julien Chamberland; Dany Mercier-Bouchard; Iris Dussault-Chouinard; Scott Benoit; Alain Doyen; Michel Britten; Yves Pouliot
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2019-06-08

2.  Influence of Transglutaminase Crosslinking on Casein Protein Fractionation during Low Temperature Microfiltration.

Authors:  Ritika Puri; Francesca Bot; Upendra Singh; James A O'Mahony
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-12-18

Review 3.  Bioactives in bovine milk: chemistry, technology, and applications.

Authors:  Tiantian Lin; Gopinathan Meletharayil; Rohit Kapoor; Alireza Abbaspourrad
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 7.110

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.