| Literature DB >> 28841858 |
Tateaki Naito1, Taro Okayama2, Takashi Aoyama3, Takuya Ohashi2,4, Yoshiyuki Masuda2, Madoka Kimura5,6, Hitomi Shiozaki3, Haruyasu Murakami5, Hirotsugu Kenmotsu5, Tetsuhiko Taira5, Akira Ono5, Kazushige Wakuda5, Hisao Imai5,7, Takuya Oyakawa5,8, Takeshi Ishii2, Shota Omori5, Kazuhisa Nakashima5, Masahiro Endo9, Katsuhiro Omae10, Keita Mori10, Nobuyuki Yamamoto11, Akira Tanuma2, Toshiaki Takahashi5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Elderly patient with advanced cancer is one of the most vulnerable populations. Skeletal muscle depletion during chemotherapy may have substantial impact on their physical function. However, there is little information about a direct relationship between quantity of muscle and physical function. We sought to explore the quantitative association between skeletal muscle depletion, and muscle strength and walking capacity in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Entities:
Keywords: Cancer cachexia; Hand-grip strength; Incremental shuttle walking distance; Non–small cell lung cancer; Sarcopenia; Skeletal muscle mass
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28841858 PMCID: PMC5574084 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3562-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Baseline characteristics
| Variables | All ( | Men ( | Women( | Reference value (men/women) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, median (range) | 74 (70–82) | 74 (70–82) | 76 (70–80) | |
| ECOG-PS, n (%) | ||||
| 0 | 11 (36.7) | 7 (36.8) | 4 (36.4) | |
| 1 | 18 (60.0) | 12 (63.2) | 6 (54.5) | |
| 2 | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (9.1) | |
| Stage, n (%) | ||||
| IIIA or IIIB | 1 (3.3) | 1 (5.3) | 0 | |
| IV or postoperative reccurence | 29 (96.7) | 18 (94.7) | 10 (100) | |
| Tumor Histology, n (%) | ||||
| Adenocarcinoma | 21 (70.0) | 13 (68.4) | 8 (72.7) | |
| Other non-small-cell lung cancer | 9 (30) | 6 (31.6) | 0 | |
| Chemotherapeutic regimen, n (%) | ||||
| Cytotoxic regimen | 24 (80.0) | 17 (89.5) | 7 (63.6) | |
| Targeted regimen | 6 (20.0) | 2 (10.5) | 4 (36.4) | |
| Never smoke, n (%) | 9 (30.0) | 0* | 9 (81.2) | |
| Comorbidities, n (%) | ||||
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 10 (33.3) | 7 (36.8) | 3 (27.3) | |
| Type 2 diabetes | 6 (20.0) | 5 (26.3) | 1 (9.1) | |
| Cerebrovascular disease | 4 (13.3) | 4 (21.1) | 0 | |
| Cardiovascular disease | 1 (3.3) | 0 | 1 (9.1) | |
| Body composition | ||||
| Body-mass index (kg/m2) | 21.1 ± 3.4 | 21.6 ± 3.5 | 20.2 ± 3.1 | |
| Lumbar skeletal muscle index (cm2/m2) | 41.2 ± 7.8 | 44.5 ± 7.6* | 35.4 ± 4.1 | |
| Skeletal muscle depletiona, n (%) | 20 (66.7) | 10 (52.6)* | 10 (90.9) | 17.2/ 19.9 [ |
| Cancer cachexiab, n (%) | 19 (63.3) | 11 (57.9) | 8 (72.7) | |
| Physical function | ||||
| Hand grip strength (dominant side, kg) | 29.3 ± 8.5 | 33.9 ± 7.1* | 21.7 ± 4.1 | 32/ 20 [ |
| Shuttle walk distance (m) | 326.0 ± 127.9 | 338.4 ± 143.0 | 304.5 ± 99.2 | 360–400 [ |
*Significant gender difference (P < 0.05) tested by Chi-square test, Fisher exact test, or Wilcoxon test. askeletal muscle mass depletion was defined as lumbar skeletal muscle mass index of <43.0 cm2/m2 for men with a BMI <25.0 kg/m2, <53.0 cm2/m2 for men with a BMI ≥25.0, and <41.0 cm2/m2 in women bDiagnosis was based on the international consensus criteria for cancer cachexia. ECOG-PS: Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status
Fig. 1Flow diagram. The number of patients and evaluable data at the T1 (baseline), T2 (6 ± 2 weeks), and T3 (12 ± 2 weeks) point is shown. The number of evaluable data for each variable is described in the box. The reasons for a missing value are described in the right side of each box. HGS, hand-grip strength; ISWD, incremental shuttle walking distance; LSMI, lumbar skeletal muscle index
Longitudinal changes in physical parameters
| Variables | Mean difference from baseline (±SE) | Mean difference between T2 and T3 (±SE) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 ± 2wks | 12 ± 4wks | ||
| N | 30 | 28 | 25 |
| Body weight (kg) | −0.9 ± 0.4* | −1.1 ± 0.6* | −0.2 ± 0.4 |
| Body-mass index (kg/m2) | −0.3 ± 0.1* | −0.4 ± 0.1* | −0.1 ± 0.1 |
| L3 muscle index (cm2/m2) | −1.8 ± 0.4* | −1.8 ± 0.7* | −0.1 ± 0.4 |
| Hand grip strength (non-dominant, kg) | −0.7 ± 0.6 | −0.7 ± 0.6 | −0.5 ± 0.3 |
| Shuttle walk distance (m) | −40.0 ± 12.6* | −46.4 ± 15.8* | −10.8 ± 11.3 |
| Clinically significant declineb, n (%) | 11 (40.7) | 13 (52.0) | 5 (20.0) |
*p < 0.05 in Wilcoxon signed-rank test compared with baseline value
bClinically significant decline is defined as losing ≥40 m of shuttle walk distance from baseline
Fig. 2Longitudinal changes in body-mass, muscle mass, and physical function. Mean changes ± standard error of physical parameters from baseline value is shown. P-value of Wilcoxon signed-rank test was shown
Fig. 3Association between changes in skeletal muscle mass and physical function. The association between change in muscle mass, and hang-grip strength (a) and shuttle walking distance (b) at all time points are plotted. Dotted line indicates the 95% confidence interval. Circle, triangle, and square mark represents change at T2 from baseline, T3 from baseline, and T3 from T2, respectively
Fig. 4Subset analysis for change in skeletal muscle mass at T2 point. Median change of skeletal muscle mass at T2 point in each subset was shown. The number of patients in each subset is indicated in parenthesis. White line indicates the median. The top and bottom of each box represent the upper and lower quartiles of the values for the sample. Bars extend above and below each box to the maximal and minimal values in the sample. P-value of Wilcoxon rank-sum test was shown. PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; PD, progressive disease assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors at T2 point