PURPOSE: Cancer cachexia (CC) is commonly seen in advanced lung cancer patients and associated with poor prognosis. However, little is known about CC that develops during chemotherapy. We evaluated the prognostic impact of CC and skeletal muscle wasting that develops during the course of chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: The clinical data of 134 newly diagnosed NSCLC patients were retrospectively reviewed. CC was defined as a body weight loss >5 or >2 % in patients with a body mass index of <20 kg/m(2). CC was assessed at baseline (T1) and 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), and 12 months (T4) after chemotherapy initiation. Skeletal muscle mass was assessed using the lumber skeletal muscle index (LSMI). RESULTS: The proportion of patients with CC at T1, T2, T3, and T4 was 45.6, 46.1, 25.5, and 26.0 %, respectively. The frequency of grade 3 chemotherapy-induced anorexia was higher in patients with CC than those without CC at T2 (15.4 vs. 0.0 %, P = 0.0044). At all time points, patients with CC had shorter survival times than those without CC. Patients with low LSMIs (men, <41 cm(2)/m(2); women, <38 cm(2)/m(2)) tended to have poor prognosis. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios and corresponding confidence intervals for CC at T1, T2, T3, and T4 were 2.53 (1.33-4.88), 1.97 (1.27-3.06), 3.86 (2.14-6.81), and 1.62 (0.80-3.16), respectively. CONCLUSION: CC presence and decreased skeletal muscle mass are associated with poor prognosis in advanced NSCLC patients receiving chemotherapy.
PURPOSE:Cancer cachexia (CC) is commonly seen in advanced lung cancerpatients and associated with poor prognosis. However, little is known about CC that develops during chemotherapy. We evaluated the prognostic impact of CC and skeletal muscle wasting that develops during the course of chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: The clinical data of 134 newly diagnosed NSCLCpatients were retrospectively reviewed. CC was defined as a body weight loss >5 or >2 % in patients with a body mass index of <20 kg/m(2). CC was assessed at baseline (T1) and 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), and 12 months (T4) after chemotherapy initiation. Skeletal muscle mass was assessed using the lumber skeletal muscle index (LSMI). RESULTS: The proportion of patients with CC at T1, T2, T3, and T4 was 45.6, 46.1, 25.5, and 26.0 %, respectively. The frequency of grade 3 chemotherapy-induced anorexia was higher in patients with CC than those without CC at T2 (15.4 vs. 0.0 %, P = 0.0044). At all time points, patients with CC had shorter survival times than those without CC. Patients with low LSMIs (men, <41 cm(2)/m(2); women, <38 cm(2)/m(2)) tended to have poor prognosis. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios and corresponding confidence intervals for CC at T1, T2, T3, and T4 were 2.53 (1.33-4.88), 1.97 (1.27-3.06), 3.86 (2.14-6.81), and 1.62 (0.80-3.16), respectively. CONCLUSION: CC presence and decreased skeletal muscle mass are associated with poor prognosis in advanced NSCLCpatients receiving chemotherapy.
Authors: Kenneth Fearon; Florian Strasser; Stefan D Anker; Ingvar Bosaeus; Eduardo Bruera; Robin L Fainsinger; Aminah Jatoi; Charles Loprinzi; Neil MacDonald; Giovanni Mantovani; Mellar Davis; Maurizio Muscaritoli; Faith Ottery; Lukas Radbruch; Paula Ravasco; Declan Walsh; Andrew Wilcock; Stein Kaasa; Vickie E Baracos Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Sami Antoun; Laura Birdsell; Michael B Sawyer; Peter Venner; Bernard Escudier; Vickie E Baracos Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-01-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lisa Martin; Laura Birdsell; Neil Macdonald; Tony Reiman; M Thomas Clandinin; Linda J McCargar; Rachel Murphy; Sunita Ghosh; Michael B Sawyer; Vickie E Baracos Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-03-25 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti; Purvish Parikh; Joachim von Pawel; Bonne Biesma; Johan Vansteenkiste; Christian Manegold; Piotr Serwatowski; Ulrich Gatzemeier; Raghunadharao Digumarti; Mauro Zukin; Jin S Lee; Anders Mellemgaard; Keunchil Park; Shehkar Patil; Janusz Rolski; Tuncay Goksel; Filippo de Marinis; Lorinda Simms; Katherine P Sugarman; David Gandara Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: W D Dewys; C Begg; P T Lavin; P R Band; J M Bennett; J R Bertino; M H Cohen; H O Douglass; P F Engstrom; E Z Ezdinli; J Horton; G J Johnson; C G Moertel; M M Oken; C Perlia; C Rosenbaum; M N Silverstein; R T Skeel; R W Sponzo; D C Tormey Journal: Am J Med Date: 1980-10 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Drazena Srdic; Sanja Plestina; Ana Sverko-Peternac; Nora Nikolac; Ana-Maria Simundic; Miroslav Samarzija Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-05-28 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Daniel Shepshelovich; Wei Xu; Lin Lu; Aline Fares; Ping Yang; David Christiani; Jie Zhang; Kouya Shiraishi; Brid M Ryan; Chu Chen; Ann G Schwartz; Adonina Tardon; Xifeng Wu; Matthew B Schabath; M Dawn Teare; Loic Le Marchand; Zuo-Feng Zhang; John K Field; Hermann Brenner; Nancy Diao; Juntao Xie; Takashi Kohno; Curtis C Harris; Angela S Wenzlaff; Guillermo Fernandez-Tardon; Yuanqing Ye; Fiona Taylor; Lynne R Wilkens; Michael Davies; Yi Liu; Matt J Barnett; Gary E Goodman; Hal Morgenstern; Bernd Holleczek; M Catherine Brown; Geoffrey Liu; Rayjean J Hung Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: C Matthew Kinsey; Raul San José Estépar; Jos van der Velden; Bernard F Cole; David C Christiani; George R Washko Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: S Shen; J L Araujo; N K Altorki; J R Sonett; A Rodriguez; K Sungur-Stasik; C F Spinelli; A I Neugut; J A Abrams Journal: Dis Esophagus Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 3.429