Literature DB >> 28841758

Precision and accuracy of diffusion kurtosis estimation and the influence of b-value selection.

Andrey Chuhutin1, Brian Hansen1, Sune Nørhøj Jespersen1,2.   

Abstract

Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) is an extension of diffusion tensor imaging that accounts for leading non-Gaussian diffusion effects. In DKI studies, a wide range of different gradient strengths (b-values) is used, which is known to affect the estimated diffusivity and kurtosis parameters. Hence there is a need to assess the accuracy and precision of the estimated parameters as a function of b-value. This work examines the error in the estimation of mean of the kurtosis tensor (MKT) with respect to the ground truth, using simulations based on a biophysical model for both gray (GM) and white (WM) matter. Model parameters are derived from densely sampled experimental data acquired in ex vivo rat brain and in vivo human brain. Additionally, the variability of MKT is studied using the experimental data. Prevalent fitting protocols are implemented and investigated. The results show strong dependence on the maximum b-value of both net relative error and standard deviation of error for all of the employed fitting protocols. The choice of b-values with minimum MKT estimation error and standard deviation of error was found to depend on the protocol type and the tissue. Protocols that utilize two terms of the cumulant expansion (DKI) were found to achieve minimum error in GM at b-values less than 1 ms/μm2 , whereas maximal b-values of about 2.5 ms/μm2 were found to be optimal in WM. Protocols including additional higher order terms of the cumulant expansion were found to provide higher accuracy for the more commonly used b-value regime in GM, but were associated with higher error in WM. Averaged over multiple voxels, a net average error of around 15% for both WM and GM was observed for the optimal b-value choice. These results suggest caution when using DKI generated metrics for microstructural modeling and when comparing results obtained using different fitting techniques and b-values.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diffusion weighted imaging; diffusion methods; methods and engineering; methods and engineering, Biophysical mechanisms of MR diffusion; methods and engineering, high order diffusion MR methods

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28841758      PMCID: PMC5715207          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  53 in total

1.  A unifying theoretical and algorithmic framework for least squares methods of estimation in diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Cheng Guan Koay; Lin-Ching Chang; John D Carew; Carlo Pierpaoli; Peter J Basser
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Modeling dendrite density from magnetic resonance diffusion measurements.

Authors:  Sune N Jespersen; Christopher D Kroenke; Leif Østergaard; Joseph J H Ackerman; Dmitriy A Yablonskiy
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Three-dimensional characterization of non-gaussian water diffusion in humans using diffusion kurtosis imaging.

Authors:  Hanzhang Lu; Jens H Jensen; Anita Ramani; Joseph A Helpern
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  A general framework for experiment design in diffusion MRI and its application in measuring direct tissue-microstructure features.

Authors:  Daniel C Alexander
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Optimal experimental design for diffusion kurtosis imaging.

Authors:  Dirk H J Poot; Arnold J den Dekker; Eric Achten; Marleen Verhoye; Jan Sijbers
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jens H Jensen; Joseph A Helpern; Anita Ramani; Hanzhang Lu; Kyle Kaczynski
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Cerebral gliomas: diffusional kurtosis imaging analysis of microstructural differences.

Authors:  Peter Raab; Elke Hattingen; Kea Franz; Friedhelm E Zanella; Heinrich Lanfermann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Neurite density from magnetic resonance diffusion measurements at ultrahigh field: comparison with light microscopy and electron microscopy.

Authors:  Sune N Jespersen; Carsten R Bjarkam; Jens R Nyengaard; M Mallar Chakravarty; Brian Hansen; Thomas Vosegaard; Leif Østergaard; Dmitriy Yablonskiy; Niels Chr Nielsen; Peter Vestergaard-Poulsen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Accuracy of q-space related parameters in MRI: simulations and phantom measurements.

Authors:  Jimmy Lätt; Markus Nilsson; Carin Malmborg; Hannah Rosquist; Ronnie Wirestam; Freddy Ståhlberg; Daniel Topgaard; Sara Brockstedt
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Formal characterization and extension of the linearized diffusion tensor model.

Authors:  Raymond Salvador; Alonso Peña; David K Menon; T Adrian Carpenter; John D Pickard; Ed T Bullmore
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.038

View more
  17 in total

1.  Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging as a Tool in Neurotoxicology.

Authors:  Brian Hansen
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 3.911

2.  Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Detects Microstructural Changes in a Methamphetamine-Induced Mouse Model of Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Anas Arab; Jana Ruda-Kucerova; Alzbeta Minsterova; Eva Drazanova; Nikoletta Szabó; Zenon Starcuk; Irena Rektorova; Amit Khairnar
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.911

Review 3.  On modeling.

Authors:  Dmitry S Novikov; Valerij G Kiselev; Sune N Jespersen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Probing tissue microstructure by diffusion skewness tensor imaging.

Authors:  Lipeng Ning; Filip Szczepankiewicz; Markus Nilsson; Yogesh Rathi; Carl-Fredrik Westin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Quantifying brain microstructure with diffusion MRI: Theory and parameter estimation.

Authors:  Dmitry S Novikov; Els Fieremans; Sune N Jespersen; Valerij G Kiselev
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Comparison of cumulant expansion and q-space imaging estimates for diffusional kurtosis in brain.

Authors:  Vaibhav Mohanty; Emilie T McKinnon; Joseph A Helpern; Jens H Jensen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 2.546

7.  Neuroanatomical underpinning of diffusion kurtosis measurements in the cerebral cortex of healthy macaque brains.

Authors:  Tianjia Zhu; Qinmu Peng; Austin Ouyang; Hao Huang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Toward more robust and reproducible diffusion kurtosis imaging.

Authors:  Rafael N Henriques; Sune N Jespersen; Derek K Jones; Jelle Veraart
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.737

9.  Diffusional kurtosis imaging and white matter microstructure modeling in a clinical study of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Kouhei Kamiya; Naohiro Okada; Kingo Sawada; Yusuke Watanabe; Ryusuke Irie; Shouhei Hanaoka; Yuichi Suzuki; Shinsuke Koike; Harushi Mori; Akira Kunimatsu; Masaaki Hori; Shigeki Aoki; Kiyoto Kasai; Osamu Abe
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Diffusion kurtosis imaging with free water elimination: A bayesian estimation approach.

Authors:  Quinten Collier; Jelle Veraart; Ben Jeurissen; Floris Vanhevel; Pim Pullens; Paul M Parizel; Arnold J den Dekker; Jan Sijbers
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.