Literature DB >> 28841560

Segmentation and Measurement of Chronic Wounds for Bioprinting.

Peyman Gholami, Mohammad Ali Ahmadi-Pajouh, Nabiollah Abolftahi, Ghassan Hamarneh, Mohammad Kayvanrad, Peyman Gholami, Mohammad Ali Ahmadi-Pajouh, Nabiollah Abolftahi, Ghassan Hamarneh, Mohammad Kayvanrad.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to provide a proof-of-concept tool for segmenting chronic wounds and transmitting the results as instructions and coordinates to a bioprinter robot and thus facilitate the treatment of chronic wounds.
METHODS: several segmentation methods used for measuring wound geometry, including edge-detection and morphological operations, region-growing, Livewire, active contours, and texture segmentation, were compared on 26 images from 15 subjects. Ground-truth wound delineations were generated by a dermatologist. The wound coordinates were converted into G-code understandable by the bioprinting robot. Due to its desirable properties, alginate hydrogel was synthesized by dissolving 16% (w/v) sodium-alginate and 4% (w/v) gelatin in deionized water and used for cell encapsulation.
RESULTS: Livewire achieved the best performance, with minimal user interaction: 97.08%, 99.68% 96.67%, 96.22, 98.15, and 32.26, mean values, respectively, for accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, Jaccard index, Dice similarity coefficient, and Hausdorff distance. The bioprinter robot was able to print skin cells on the surface of skin with a 95.56% similarity between the bioprinted patch's dimensions and the desired wound geometry.
CONCLUSION: we have designed a novel approach for the healing of chronic wounds, based on semiautomatic segmentation of wound images, improving clinicians' control of the bioprinting process through more accurate coordinates. SIGNIFICANCE: this study is the first to perform wound bioprinting based on image segmentation. It also compares several segmentation methods used for this purpose to determine the best.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28841560     DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2017.2743526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform        ISSN: 2168-2194            Impact factor:   5.772


  3 in total

1.  Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting: A Scientometric Analysis of Two Decades of Progress.

Authors:  Sara Cristina Pedroza-González; Marisela Rodriguez-Salvador; Baruc Emet Pérez-Benítez; Mario Moisés Alvarez; Grissel Trujillo-de Santiago
Journal:  Int J Bioprint       Date:  2021-04-20

2.  Integrating 3D Model Representation for an Accurate Non-Invasive Assessment of Pressure Injuries with Deep Learning.

Authors:  Sofia Zahia; Begonya Garcia-Zapirain; Adel Elmaghraby
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Deep learning approach based on superpixel segmentation assisted labeling for automatic pressure ulcer diagnosis.

Authors:  Che Wei Chang; Mesakh Christian; Dun Hao Chang; Feipei Lai; Tom J Liu; Yo Shen Chen; Wei Jen Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.