Vitamin D insufficiency is associated with an increased risk of early clinical failure in follicular lymphoma.

We evaluated whether vitamin D insufficiency (VDI; 25(OH)D <20 ng/ml) was associated with adverse outcomes among follicular lymphoma (FL) patients using an observational prospective cohort study of 642 FL patients enrolled from 2002-2012. The median age at diagnosis was 60 years. At a median follow-up of 59 months, 297 patients (46%) had an event (progression, treatment failure), 78 had died and 42 (6.5%) had a lymphoma-related death. VDI was associated with inferior event-free survival (EFS) at 12 months (EFS12, odds ratio (OR)=2.05; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-3.54), overall survival (OS, hazards ratio (HR)=2.35; 95%CI 1.37-4.02), and lymphoma-specific survival (LSS, HR=2.97; 95% CI 1.52-5.80) for the full cohort. Among patients treated with immunochemotherapy (IC), VDI was associated with inferior EFS12 (OR=3.00; 95% CI 1.26-7.13), OS (HR=2.86; 95% CI 1.39-5.85), and LSS (HR=2.96; 95% CI 1.29-6.79). For observed patients, VDI was associated with inferior OS (HR=2.85; 95% CI 1.20-6.76). For other therapies, VDI was associated with inferior OS (HR=3.06; 95% CI 1.01-9.24). Our work is the first to reveal an association of VDI with early clinical failure, and to demonstrate an association of VDI with adverse outcomes among patients who are observed or treated with therapies other than IC. Our findings suggest a potentially modifiable prognostic factor to address in patients with FL.

Introduction

The survival of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) has substantially improved over the past 20 years, and these gains are partially attributable to the use of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy, exemplified by rituximab, as a single agent or added to traditional chemotherapy regimens.[1] While FL is considered an indolent lymphoma, the clinical course is highly variable, with an overall survival (OS) at 5 years in the rituximab era ranging from 90% for low-risk patients by the FL International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) to 65% for high-risk patients,[2] and there is a need to identify better prognostic markers and treatments in this heterogeneous disease.[1] Casulo et al.[3] reported that disease progression within 24 months of diagnosis predicts shorter OS in FL patients initially treated with immunochemotherapy. For all FL patients, we recently reported that event-free survival (EFS) at 12 months (EFS12), defined as any progression, retreatment or death due to any cause within 12 months of diagnosis, is a marker of poor outcome.[4] Specifically, we demonstrated that the 83% of patients in our FL cohort who achieved EFS12 had no excess mortality above that of an age- and sex-matched general population with a median follow-up of 71 months. In contrast, the remaining group of patients experienced a more aggressive course, incurring overall mortality rates 3–8-fold higher than their matched counterparts. Prognostic markers associated with failure to achieve EFS12 would therefore allow for early identification of high-risk patients at a timepoint when alternative treatment strategies may be beneficial.

In an earlier publication, we evaluated the association of vitamin D insufficiency (VDI), defined as <25 ng/ml, with prognosis across a variety of lymphoma subtypes, and found a strong prognostic association with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and peripheral T-cell lymphoma but not with either EFS or OS in FL, although our power for OS was low.[5] More recently, Kelly et al.[6] demonstrated that VDI, defined as <20 ng/ml, was associated with inferior progression-free survival (PFS) and OS among patients with FL treated with IC. Further, Bittenbring et al. demonstrated that diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients with VDI who were treated with R-CHOP experienced inferior EFS and OS as compared to patients with optimal vitamin D levels, but there was no difference in outcomes in a historical cohort of patients treated with CHOP,[7] raising the question of whether VDI is an adverse prognostic factor for patients who do not receive rituximab-containing regimens. Directly extrapolating these findings to FL would imply that VDI is of little prognostic benefit for the large number of patients who are initially approached with a watchful waiting strategy or with non-IC regimens.[8] However VDI has also been shown to be broadly predictive of inferior outcomes in T-cell lymphoma,[5] CLL,[9] multiple myeloma,[10] several solid malignancies[11, 12, 13] and even all-cause mortality, suggesting that VDI may instead be a more global marker of poor prognosis, regardless of initial treatment.

To determine whether VDI is prognostic of inferior clinical outcomes in FL regardless of initial therapy as well as in selected treatment subgroups, we examined the association of circulating 25(OH)D levels with OS and lymphoma-specific survival (LSS) in an expanded analysis of our prior cohort (increased from 285 to 642 FL patients), and also for the first time examined whether VDI is associated with early clinical failure, defined as failure to achieve EFS12.

Materials and methods

Study population

As previously described, all patients included in this study were enrolled in the Molecular Epidemiology Resource of the University of Iowa/Mayo Clinic Lymphoma Specialized Program of Research Excellence.[5] This study was approved by the human subjects institutional review board and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Since September 2002, we have offered enrollment to consecutive, newly diagnosed (within 9 months) patients with NHL who were evaluated at Mayo Clinic Rochester and the University of Iowa, were age 18 years or older, and were a resident of the United States. Exclusion criteria included known HIV infection, and unwillingness or inability to provide written informed consent. All pathology was reviewed by a lymphoma hematopathologist to verify the diagnosis and the classification of FL according to WHO criteria.[14, 15] A blood sample was obtained at enrollment, and a standard protocol was used to abstract baseline clinical, laboratory and treatment data from medical records. Patients were contacted every 6 months for the first 3 years, and then annually thereafter, and reports of disease progression, retreatment and death were verified by medical record review.

Vitamin D measurement

Measurements of 25(OH)D were performed as described previously.[5] 25(OH)D was quantified by the gold-standard liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method, and represented the sum of 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3 fractions. Measurements of 25(OH)D were made by deuterated stable isotope [d6-25(OH)D]-dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry on an API 4000 instrument (Applied Biosystems, Forest City, CA, USA), with sample introduction performed by a cohesive four-channel multiplexed system (Thermo-Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Calibration utilized a six-point standard curve over a concentration range of 0–200 ng/ml. Intra- and interassay coefficients of variation have been previously reported, and are less than 7%. All 642 samples were successfully assayed. We defined VDI as serum 25(OH)D level <20 ng/ml, as levels above this are considered sufficient by the US Institute of Medicine.[16]

Statistical analysis

Our primary endpoints were EFS12, OS, and lymphoma-specific survival (LSS). EFS was defined as time from diagnosis to the first event of progression, retreatment or death; EFS12 was defined using EFS status at 12 months from diagnosis. LSS was defined as the time from diagnosis to death due to disease, and OS was defined as the time from diagnosis to death due to any cause. Patients without an event or death were censored at time of last known follow-up. X2 and Fisher’s exact tests were used to assess the association of 25(OH)D levels with baseline clinical and demographic characteristics. Associations of 25(OH)D levels with LSS and OS were estimated using Kaplan–Meier curves, and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were estimated from Cox regression models. Associations with EFS12 were estimated from logistic regression models, using odds ratios (ORs) and 95%CI. These models were adjusted for FLIPI,[17] body mass index and season of blood draw (by calendar quarter). Analyses were performed using SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and R version 3.1.1 (http://www.r-project.org/).

Results

From 2002 through 2012, 920 patients with FL grade 1-3a were enrolled in the MER cohort. 278 patients were excluded for not having a serum sample available within 120 days of diagnosis, leaving 642 patients available for analysis. The median age at diagnosis of these patients was 60 years (range 23–93 years) and 52% were male. For initial treatment, 252 received combination IC (118 received rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP); 85 received rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (R-CVP); 45 received rituximab with bendamustine (BR); and four received rituximab, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone). Two hundred eighteen were observed, 76 received rituximab monotherapy and 96 received other therapies.

The distribution of vitamin D levels (Supplementary Figure S1) was similar to that seen previously in North American cohorts,[18] with an overall median serum 25(OH)D level of 29 ng/ml (s.d. 11.9 ng/ml). Median vitamin D levels were similar across treatment groups (Table 1). Using a threshold of <20 ng/ml, the overall prevalence of VDI was 19% (120/642). Within specific treatment groups, the prevalence of VDI was 23% for patients treated with IC (58/252), 17% for observed patients (36/218), 14% for patients treated with rituximab monotherapy (11/76) and 16% for patients treated with other therapies (15/96). Prevalence of VDI was not associated with sex, age, geographic residence at time of diagnosis, season of blood draw, Ann Arbor Stage, bone marrow involvement or FLIPI. VDI was associated with non-white race (P=0.03), obesity (P=0.001) and lower performance status (P=0.001); these associations also persisted within some specific treatment groups (Table 1).

Table 1

Baseline characteristics and prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency

Characteristic	Total (n=642)				Immunochemotherapy (n=252)				Observation (n=218)				R-monotherapy (n=76)				Other therapy (n=96)
25(OH)D mediana 25(OH)D rangea	29 6–81				29 6–81				31 6–72				29 8–57				30 12–65
	No.	No <20	% <20	Pb	No.	No. <20	% <20	Pb	No.	No. <20	% <20	Pb	No.	No. <20	% <20	Pb	No.	No <20	% <20	Pb
All patients	642	120	19%		252	58	23%		218	36	17%		76	11	14%		96	15	16%
Sex				0.43				0.55				0.67				0.28				0.89
Male	331	58	18%		139	30	22%		104	16	15%		32	3	9%		56	9	16%
Female	311	62	20%		113	28	25%		114	20	18%		44	8	18%		40	6	15%
Age				0.49				0.85				0.47				0.49				0.62
⩽60	334	59	18%		146	33	23%		109	16	15%		35	4	11%		44	6	14%
>60	308	61	20%		106	25	24%		109	20	18%		41	7	17%		52	9	17%
Race				0.03				0.36				0.18				0.002				0.04
White	564	101	18%		225	53	24%		193	30	16%		65	6	9%		81	12	15%
Non-white	16	7	44%		9	3	33%		4	2	50%		0	0	0%		3	2	67%
Unknown	62	12	19%		18	2	11%		21	4	19%		11	5	46%		12	1	8%
Upper Midwest residence at diagnosis				0.95				0.90				0.27				0.55				0.07
Yes	552	102	19%		215	48	22%		192	34	18%		61	9	15%		84	11	13%
No	77	14	18%		30	7	23%		23	2	9%		12	1	8%		12	4	33%
Unknown	13	4	31%		7	3	43%		3	0	0%		3	1	33%		0	0	0%
Month of diagnosis				0.16				0.71				0.25				0.41				0.14
March–May	173	39	23%		68	19	28%		60	9	15%		25	6	24%		20	5	25%
June–August	145	27	19%		58	13	22%		48	10	21%		19	2	11%		20	2	10%
September–November	160	21	13%		56	12	21%		55	5	9%		17	2	12%		32	2	6%
December–February	164	33	20%		70	14	20%		55	12	22%		15	1	7%		24	6	25%
BMI, kg m−2				0.001				0.06				0.10				0.03				0.52
<25	179	27	15%		68	15	22%		54	5	9%		31	5	16%		26	2	8%
25–30	227	30	13%		91	15	17%		75	10	13%		25	0	0%		36	5	14%
>30	180	48	27%		75	24	32%		66	15	23%		18	5	28%		21	4	19%
Unknown	56	15	27%		18	4	22%		23	6	27%		2	1	50%		13	4	31%
Grade				0.27				0.77				0.51				0.34				0.28
1–2	555	100	18%		182	41	23%		210	34	16%		73	10	14%		90	15	17%
3a	87	20	23%		70	17	24%		8	2	25%		3	1	33%		6	0	0%
Ann Arbor Stage				0.66				0.15				0.28				0.50				0.91
I–II	199	35	18%		52	8	15%		77	16	21%		18	3	17%		52	8	15%
III–IV	431	82	19%		198	49	25%		134	20	15%		56	6	11%		43	7	16%
Missing	12	3	25%		2	1	50%		7	0	0%		2	2	100%		1	0	0%
BM involvement				0.43				0.72				0.36				0.89				0.06
Yes	245	44	18%		113	27	24%		78	9	12%		25	3	12%		29	5	17%
No	313	54	17%		119	24	20%		99	19	19%		39	5	13%		56	6	11%
No biopsy	62	15	24%		15	4	27%		32	6	19%		5	1	20%		10	4	40%
Missing	22	7	32%		5	3	60%		9	2	22%		7	2	29%		1	0	0%
Performance status				0.001				0.007				0.39				0.68				0.02
<2	615	108	18%		235	49	21%		210	34	16%		75	11	15%		95	14	15%
⩾2	25	11	44%		16	8	50%		7	2	29%		1	0	0%		1	1	100%
Missing	2	1	50%		1	1	100%		1	0	0%		0	0	0%		0	0	0%
FLIPI				0.30				0.71				0.75				0.68				0.66
0–1	250	39	16%		73	14	19%		97	14	14%		25	4	16%		55	7	13%
2	219	42	19%		82	20	24%		79	14	18%		32	3	9%		26	5	19%
⩾3	168	36	21%		93	22	24%		42	8	18%		18	3	17%		15	3	20%
Missing	5	3	60%		4	2	50%		0	0	0%		1	1	100%		0	0	0%

Abbreviations: 25(OH)D, 25-hydroxyvitamin D; BM, bone marrow; BMI, body mass index; FLIPI, FL International Prognostic Index; IC, immunochemotherapy.

Note: bold font indicates significance.

25(OH)D reported in ng/ml.

P-value from χ2-test applied to prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency between respective clinical subpopulations.

At a median follow-up of 59 months (range 1–144), 297 patients (46%) had an event, 78 had died (12%) and 42 (6.5%) had a lymphoma-related death. The EFS12 rate per Kaplan–Meier was 84% (95% CI: 82–87%). In all patients, VDI was associated with inferior EFS12 (OR=2.05; 95% CI 1.18–3.54), OS (HR=2.35; 95% CI 1.37–4.02), and LSS (HR=2.97; 95% CI 1.52–5.80) after adjustment for treatment, FLIPI, BMI and season of blood draw (Table 2 and Figures 1 and 2). Univariate results are shown in Supplementary Table SI.

Table 2

Multivariable-associated ORs and HRs for vitamin D insufficiencya for event-free survival at 12 months, lymphoma-specific survival and overall survival

	No.	Distribution (%)	Event-free survival at 12 months				Lymphoma-specific survival				Overall survival
			No. of events	% events	ORb	95% CI	No. of events	% events	HRb	95% CI	No. of events	% events	HRb	95% CI
All patients
Sufficient	480	82%	69	14%	1.00	Reference	23	5%	1.00	Reference	43	9%	1.00	Reference
Insufficient	105	18%	26	25%	2.05	1.18–3.54	17	16%	2.97	1.52–5.80	21	23%	2.35	1.37–4.02
(P)						(0.004)				(0.002)				(0.002)
IC
Sufficient	180	77%	16	9%	1.00	Reference	13	7%	1.00	Reference	17	9%	1.00	Reference
Insufficient	54	23%	13	24%	3.00	1.26–7.13	11	20%	2.96	1.29–6.79	14	26%	2.86	1.39–5.85
(P)						(0.013)				(0.010)				(0.004)
Observation
Sufficient	165	85%	33	20%	1.00	Reference	3	2%	ND	ND	12	7%	1.00	Reference
Insufficient	30	15%	9	30%	1.71	0.70–4.17	4	13%			6	20%	2.25	1.20–6.76
(P)						(0.24)								(0.017)
R-monotherapy
Sufficient	63	86%	9	14%	1.00	Reference	0	0%	ND	ND	2	3%	ND	ND
Insufficient	10	14%	1	9%	0.63	0.06–6.49	2	20%			3	30%
(P)						(0.70)
Other therapy
Sufficient	72	87%	11	15%	1.00	Reference	7	9%	ND	ND	12	17%	1.00	Reference
Insufficient	11	13%	3	27%	2.31	0.41–13.07	0	0%			1	9%	3.06	1.01–9.24
(P)						(0.34)								(0.047)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; IC, immunochemotherapy; OR, odds ratios; ND, not determined; R-mono, rituximab monotherapy.

Note: bold font indicates significance.

25(OH)D insufficiency defined as <20 ng/ml.

Outcomes for the full cohort were adjusted for FLIPI, body mass index, treatment and timing of blood draw. Outcomes for remaining treatment groups were adjusted for FLIPI, body mass index and timing of blood draw.

Figure 1

Kaplan–Meier curves for 25(OH)D insufficiency and OS for (a) all patients; (b) patients treated with IC; (c) patients observed without receiving therapy; and (d) patients receiving other therapies.

Figure 2

Kaplan–Meier curves for 25(OH)D insufficiency and EFS for (a) all patients; (b) patients treated with immunochemotherapy (IC); (c) patients observed without receiving therapy; and (d) patients receiving other therapies.

For patients treated with IC, VDI was associated with inferior EFS12 (OR=3.00; 95% CI 1.26–7.13), OS (HR=2.86; 95% CI 1.39–5.85) and LSS (HR=2.96; 95%CI 1.29–6.79) after adjusting for FLIPI, body mass index and season of blood draw. For observed patients, VDI was associated with inferior OS (HR=2.85; 95% CI 1.20–6.76) but was not significantly associated with inferior EFS12 (OR=1.71; 95% CI 0.70–4.17); LSS could not be calculated due to insufficient deaths from lymphoma (N=7).

For patients who were initially treated with rituximab monotherapy, VDI was not significantly associated with EFS12 (OR=0.63; 95% CI 0.06–6.49). OS and LSS could not be calculated due to insufficient deaths (N=5), or deaths due to lymphoma (N=2).

Finally, for patients who had received other therapies, VDI was also associated with inferior OS both before (HR=3.29; 95% CI 1.12–9.62) and after adjustment for FLIPI, body mass index and season of blood draw (HR=3.06; 95% CI 1.01–9.24). There was also a trend towards a significant association of VDI with EFS12 (OR=3.18; 95% CI 0.91–11.08); LSS could not be calculated due to insufficient deaths from lymphoma (N=7).

When we combined all patients treated with any rituximab-containing therapy, VDI was associated with inferior EFS12 (OR=2.40; 95% CI 1.12–5.14), OS (HR=2.99; 95% CI 1.50–5.97) and LSS (HR=3.48; 95% CI 1.55–7.83). For comparison to our prior publication,[5] we repeated our analyses using the threshold of 25 ng/ml; this did not materially affect our conclusions (Supplementary Table SII). Associations were also modeled using continuously distributed 25(OH)D concentrations, which revealed associations of inferior outcomes with 25(OH)D levels <20 ng/ml, with some suggestion of inferior outcome associations for levels as high as 25 ng/ml (Supplementary Figure S2). Finally, associations between VDI, defined as 20 ng/ml, and inferior outcomes were similar to the above findings when using EFS24 (approximately equivalent to POD24(ref. as the end point (Supplementary Table SIII).

Discussion

The current report of 642 patients with FL consecutively enrolled in a systematic prospective cohort study is the first to demonstrate an association of VDI with inferior LSS and OS regardless of initial treatment and after adjustment for FLIPI and other clinical factors, as well as the first to demonstrate that VDI is associated with early clinical failure, as defined by EFS12. Our results are congruent with those of Kelly et al.[6] who demonstrated an association of VDI with inferior OS and PFS using two clinical trial cohorts from the US and Europe. While all of the patients included in that study had been treated with CHOP-based IC, our findings extend these observations to other FL patients initially observed or who received other therapies. Although no clear associations in our study were identified for patients treated with rituximab monotherapy, we had low power in this treatment group. We chose a threshold of 20 ng/ml to define VDI, which is the level at which the Institute of Medicine has defined vitamin D insufficiency for the general US population. Importantly, vitamin D distributions vary with latitude of residence, time spent in the midday sun, race, body mass index, diet and other factors, and it is not clear if this cutpoint would be optimal in other populations.[6, 7]

Previous studies of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma revealed that VDI led to inferior outcomes only among those patients treated with rituximab-including regimens, possibly due to vitamin D-mediated enhancement of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, a crucial mediator of rituximab efficacy.[19] Our most robust findings were in IC treated patients, and were slightly stronger for any rituximab-containing regimens; however, elevated risk of a similar magnitude was also observed among observed patients and patients treated with other (non-IC) therapies for both EFS12 and OS, although estimates were imprecise and not statistically significant. This suggests that in the setting of FL, vitamin D-mediated enhancement of rituximab efficacy may not impart any additional clinical benefit, but further data are needed to fully address this question.

The discovery of factors identifying FL patients at high risk for early clinical failure has been cited as a significant unmet clinical need.[20] By demonstrating an association of VDI with EFS12, we provide valuable new prognostic information that can better inform clinicians counseling newly diagnosed patients, as well as aid in shaping future clinical trial design. Importantly, VDI represents the first modifiable adverse prognostic factor in FL, supporting the need to test the impact of Vitamin D repletion in insufficient patients. Future research should also assess whether certain subgroups of FL patients have greater benefit from repletion.

One ongoing clinical trial (clinicaltrials.gov #NCT01787409) is examining whether vitamin D replacement can improve EFS12 among patients newly diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, peripheral T-cell lymphoma or early stage CLL. Initial results demonstrated that an enteral replacement strategy can achieve vitamin D sufficiency in 97% of such patients within 12 weeks.[21] These findings suggest rapid vitamin D repletion may also be achievable in the context of FL. Randomized controlled trials should be performed examining the impact of vitamin D repletion on prognosis in FL, and should consider using EFS12 and OS as primary outcomes.

Strengths of this study include the prospective cohort design, consecutive enrollment of newly diagnosed patients with FL, large sample size, assessment of early events, central pathology review, medical record validation and our virtually complete follow-up of events. Additionally, we used liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for 25(OH)D quantification, which is considered the gold standard. Our cohort includes all patients with FL and available serum enrolled in the parent MER cohort, reducing selection bias. Limitations include the study’s observational design, as well as the median follow-up of 59 months, which is relatively modest given the slowly progressive nature of FL.

In conclusion, VDI in FL is predictive of early clinical failure among all patients and a subset of patients treated with IC, and is also predictive of inferior longer-term prognosis among all patients, as well as in subsets who are observed, treated with IC, or non-rituximab-containing regimens. The results of this study support the incorporation of serum 25(OH)D measurement into routine studies performed at the time of diagnosis to help identify patients at risk of early clinical failure, as well as to inform longer-term prognosis. Further investigations are needed to determine whether outcomes could be improved in FL by supplementation with this readily available vitamin.