Literature DB >> 28840319

Southwick angle measurements and SCFE slip severity classifications are affected by frog-lateral positioning.

Carly E Jones1,2, Anthony P Cooper3,4, Jonathan Doucette1,2, Lawrence L Buchan1,5, David R Wilson1,4, Kishore Mulpuri3,4, Agnes G d'Entremont6,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is a hip disorder where the femoral head slips relative to the neck at the physis. Appropriate treatment of SCFE depends on the severity of the slip, commonly categorised using the Southwick (SW) angle. The SW angle is measured in the frog-lateral leg position, which can be painful and potentially unattainable for patients. The purpose of this study is to determine how errors in frog-lateral radiograph positioning affect measured SW angles and slip classifications.
METHODS: Models of SCFE hips were produced from one CT scan of a normal hip; 360 deformities were created. SW angles were measured from a simulated frog-lateral position. Femoral lateral head-neck angles (LHNA; equivalent to SW in incorrect frog-lateral plane) were measured over a range of 837 incorrect frog-lateral leg positions with positioning errors in flexion and/or internal/external rotation.
RESULTS: Seventy-six per cent of all imaging position-deformity combinations had error in the reported angle (>1° difference between LHNA and SW). Of those, 70% had <5°, 24% had 5° to 10°, and 6% had >10° of error from the actual SW angle. Three per cent of LHNAs that had >10° error resulted from <10° of positioning error.
CONCLUSIONS: If the patient is limited in flexion or external rotation, more diagnostic testing should be considered if error in the reported slip measurement would affect treatment decisions or if accurate severity classification is needed for research. Small positioning errors in moderate and severe slips can cause a > 10° LHNA error; additional three-dimensional imaging should be considered.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer modelling; Hip; Juvenile; Paediatric; Radiographic measures; Rare disease; SCFE; Slipped capital femoral epiphysis; Southwick

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28840319     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2761-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  13 in total

1.  Value of measurement of hip movements in childhood hip disorders.

Authors:  K N Rao; B Joseph
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

Review 2.  Controversies in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Randall T Loder
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  The gait function of slipped capital femoral epiphysis in patients after growth arrest and its correlation with the clinical outcome.

Authors:  Bettina Westhoff; Katharina Ruhe; Kristina Weimann-Stahlschmidt; Christoph Zilkens; Reinhart Willers; Rüdiger Krauspe
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  George S Wu; Avrum N Pollock
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.454

5.  Relationship between Body Mass Index and slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Eric M Manoff; Michael B Banffy; Jennifer Jo Winell
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.324

Review 6.  Imaging SCFE: diagnosis, treatment and complications.

Authors:  Delma Y Jarrett; Travis Matheney; Paul K Kleinman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-03-12

Review 7.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis: prevalence, pathogenesis, and natural history.

Authors:  Eduardo N Novais; Michael B Millis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Relationships Between Severity of Deformity and Impingement in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis.

Authors:  Carly E Jones; Anthony P Cooper; Jonathan Doucette; Lawrence L Buchan; David R Wilson; Kishore Mulpuri; Agnes G d'Entremont
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.324

9.  Clinical implications of anatomical wear characteristics in slipped capital femoral epiphysis and primary osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Edward Abraham; Mark H Gonzalez; Surya Pratap; Farid Amirouche; Prasant Atluri; Patrick Simon
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2007 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.324

10.  Management of slipped capital femoral epiphysis: results of a survey of the members of the European Paediatric Orthopaedic Society.

Authors:  R J A Sonnega; J A van der Sluijs; A M Wainwright; A Roposch; F Hefti
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 1.548

View more
  5 in total

1.  Management of Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: The Hawai'i Experience.

Authors:  John P Livingstone; Mariya I Opanova; Robert C Durkin; William Burkhalter
Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf       Date:  2019-11

2.  Epiphyseal Angulation and Related Spatial Orientation in Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis: Theoretical Model and Biomechanical Explanation of Varus and Valgus Slip.

Authors:  Emanuel Gautier; Caroline Passaplan; Lucienne Gautier
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2020-12-23

3.  Which anatomical conditions are associated with limitations of the hip function after SCFE?

Authors:  Nils Wirries; Gesche Heinrich; Alexander Derksen; Michael Schwarze; Stefan Budde; Henning Windhagen; Thilo Floerkemeier
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-07-12

4.  Good inter- and intraobserver reliability for assessment of the slip angle in 77 hip radiographs of children with a slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Bengt Herngren; Mikael Lindell; Gunnar Hägglund
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Effect of positioning error on the Hilgenreiner epiphyseal angle and the head-shaft angle compared to the femoral neck-shaft angle in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Emily S Sullivan; Carly Jones; Stacey D Miller; Kyoung Min Lee; Moon Seok Park; David R Wilson; Kishore Mulpuri; Agnes G d'Entremont
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 1.041

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.