Literature DB >> 34341629

Which anatomical conditions are associated with limitations of the hip function after SCFE?

Nils Wirries1, Gesche Heinrich1, Alexander Derksen1, Michael Schwarze2, Stefan Budde1, Henning Windhagen1, Thilo Floerkemeier3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients sustained a slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) might have symptoms beyond their stabilization surgery in the childhood.
METHODS: 35 patients with a SCFE were treated in our clinic and available for a clinical follow-up. The results were compared in dependence of the presence of dysplasia, acetabular retroversion or a FAI type CAM.
RESULTS: A FAI type CAM led to significant inferior results (p < 0.05), especially in combination with a retroversion.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcome seemed to be influenced by the presence of a FAI type CAM or a combination with a retroversion, which might aggravate the femoro-acetabular conflict. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective.
© 2021 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoro-acetabular impingement; Hip dysplasia; Retroversion; Slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Year:  2021        PMID: 34341629      PMCID: PMC8318912          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  25 in total

1.  Valgus slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  S García-Mata; A Hidalgo-Ovejero
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

2.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

Authors:  N Bellamy; W W Buchanan; C H Goldsmith; J Campbell; L W Stitt
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  Correlation of Short Form-36 and disability status with outcomes of arthroscopic acetabular labral debridement.

Authors:  Benjamin K Potter; Brett A Freedman; Romney C Andersen; John A Bojescul; Timothy R Kuklo; Kevin P Murphy
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement.

Authors:  H P Nötzli; T F Wyss; C H Stoecklin; M R Schmid; K Treiber; J Hodler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-05

5.  Slipped capital femoral epiphysis and its association with endocrine, metabolic and chronic diseases: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  M Witbreuk; F J van Kemenade; J A van der Sluijs; E P Jansma; J Rotteveel; B J van Royen
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 1.548

6.  Increased acetabular depth may influence physeal stability in slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  David A Podeszwa; David Gurd; Anthony Riccio; Adriana De La Rocha; Daniel J Sucato
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Discrepancies in measuring acetabular coverage: revisiting the anterior and lateral center edge angles.

Authors:  Joey A Hanson; Ashley L Kapron; Kathryn M Swenson; Travis G Maak; Christopher L Peters; Stephen K Aoki
Journal:  J Hip Preserv Surg       Date:  2015-06-13

8.  A nationwide cohort study of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  Daniel C Perry; David Metcalfe; Matthew L Costa; Tjeerd Van Staa
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Prognostic factors for long-term outcome of chronic slipped capital femoral epiphysis treated with fixation in situ.

Authors:  T Terjesen; A Wensaas
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.548

10.  Where is the neck? Alpha angle measurement revisited.

Authors:  Heinse Bouma; Niels-Jan Slot; Paul Toogood; Tom Pollard; Paulien van Kampen; Tom Hogervorst
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.