Literature DB >> 28840283

Role of point of application of perturbation in control of vertical posture.

Bing Chen1, Yun-Ju Lee2, Alexander S Aruin3.   

Abstract

The role of point of application of perturbation in the anticipatory (APAs) and compensatory (CPAs) postural control was studied. Twelve healthy participants stood on a sliding board (that was either locked and as such motionless or unlocked and as such free to move in the anterior-posterior direction). The body perturbations were applied either to the shoulders (by a pendulum impact) or the feet (by the movement of the sliding board). Electromyographic activity (EMG) of the trunk and lower extremity muscles was recorded. Latencies, integrals of EMG and muscle co-contraction (C) and reciprocal (R) activation indices were calculated and analyzed within the intervals typical for the APAs and CPAs. Higher EMG integrals were seen in the APAs phase when perturbation was applied to the shoulders. Reciprocal activation of muscles was seen in the APAs phase in the shoulders perturbation condition, while co-contraction was seen in the feet perturbation condition. Co-contraction was observed within the CPA phase in both experimental conditions. Higher C values were found in the feet perturbation condition in the CPA phase. The results suggest that different motor control strategies are employed by the central nervous system when encounter perturbations of similar magnitude but applied to different parts of the body. The outcome highlights the importance of investigation of the role of the point of application of the perturbation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticipatory; Compensatory; Muscle activation; Perturbation; Point of application; Postural control

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28840283     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5069-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  42 in total

Review 1.  Acquisition of anticipatory postural adjustments in a bimanual load-lifting task: normal and pathological aspects.

Authors:  J Massion; M Ioffe; C Schmitz; F Viallet; R Gantcheva
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Fear of falling modifies anticipatory postural control.

Authors:  Allan L Adkin; James S Frank; Mark G Carpenter; Gerhard W Peysar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Anticipatory postural adjustments during load catching by standing subjects.

Authors:  T Shiratori; M L Latash
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Resolving conflicts in task demands during balance recovery: does holding an object inhibit compensatory grasping?

Authors:  Hamid Bateni; Aleksandra Zecevic; William E McIlroy; Brian E Maki
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The effects of muscle vibration on anticipatory postural adjustments.

Authors:  Harm Slijper; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-23       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Unified theory regarding A/P and M/L balance in quiet stance.

Authors:  D A Winter; F Prince; J S Frank; C Powell; K F Zabjek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Control of grip force and vertical posture while holding an object and being perturbed.

Authors:  Bing Chen; Yun-Ju Lee; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The role of anticipatory postural adjustments in compensatory control of posture: 2. Biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Marcio J Santos; Neeta Kanekar; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 2.368

9.  Older adults utilize less efficient postural control when performing pushing task.

Authors:  Yun-Ju Lee; Bing Chen; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 2.368

10.  Anticipatory postural control following fatigue of postural and focal muscles.

Authors:  Neeta Kanekar; Marcio J Santos; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Muscle coactivation: definitions, mechanisms, and functions.

Authors:  Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Role of a single session of ball throwing exercise on postural control in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Yunju Lee; Nikita Goyal; Geraldine Luna; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Linearity and repeatability of postural responses in relation to peak force and impulse of manually delivered perturbations: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Zeevi Dvir; Maria Paterna; Martina Quargnenti; Carlo De Benedictis; Daniela Maffiodo; Walter Franco; Carlo Ferraresi; Andrea Manca; Franca Deriu; Silvestro Roatta
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Center of pressure displacement due to graded controlled perturbations to the trunk in standing subjects: the force-impulse paradigm.

Authors:  Maria Paterna; Zeevi Dvir; Carlo De Benedictis; Daniela Maffiodo; Walter Franco; Carlo Ferraresi; Silvestro Roatta
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Which Exercise Interventions Can Most Effectively Improve Reactive Balance in Older Adults? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Youngwook Kim; Michael N Vakula; David A E Bolton; Christopher J Dakin; Brennan J Thompson; Timothy A Slocum; Masaru Teramoto; Eadric Bressel
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 5.750

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.