Literature DB >> 28840171

Estimation of subject coregistration errors during multimodal preclinical imaging using separate instruments: origins and avoidance of artifacts.

Jean-Philippe Dillenseger1,2,3, Christian Goetz1,4, Amira Sayeh1, Chris Healy5, Isabelle Duluc3,6, Jean-Noël Freund3,6, André Constantinesco1, Gaëlle Aubertin-Kirch3,7, Philippe Choquet1,2,3.   

Abstract

We use high-resolution [Formula: see text] data in multiple experiments to estimate the sources of error during coregistration of images acquired on separate preclinical instruments. In combination with experiments with phantoms, we completed in vivo imaging on mice, aimed at identifying the possible sources of registration errors, caused either by transport of the animal, movement of the animal itself, or methods of coregistration. The same imaging cell was used as a holder for phantoms and animals. For all procedures, rigid coregistration was carried out using a common landmark coregistration system, placed inside the imaging cell. We used the fiducial registration error and the target registration error to analyze the coregistration accuracy. We found that moving an imaging cell between two preclinical devices during a multimodal procedure gives an error of about [Formula: see text] at most. Therefore, it could not be considered a source of coregistration errors. Errors linked to spontaneous movements of the animal increased with time, to nearly 1 mm at most, excepted for body parts that were properly restrained. This work highlights the importance of animal intrinsic movements during a multiacquisition procedure and demonstrates a simple method to identify and quantify the sources of error during coregistration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coregistration; multimodal imaging; x-ray computed tomography

Year:  2017        PMID: 28840171      PMCID: PMC5566578          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.035503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  21 in total

1.  National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU-4 performance evaluation of the PET component of the NanoPET/CT preclinical PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  Istvan Szanda; Jane Mackewn; Gergely Patay; Peter Major; Kavitha Sunassee; Gregory E Mullen; Gabor Nemeth; York Haemisch; Philip J Blower; Paul K Marsden
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Effects of breathing and cardiac motion on spatial resolution in the microscopic imaging of rodents.

Authors:  Wilfried Maï; Cristian T Badea; Charles T Wheeler; Laurence W Hedlund; G Allan Johnson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Considerations for laboratory animal imaging center design and setup.

Authors:  Brenda A Klaunberg; Judith A Davis
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2008

4.  PET/MRI: paving the way for the next generation of clinical multimodality imaging applications.

Authors:  Bernd J Pichler; Armin Kolb; Thomas Nägele; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Applications for preclinical PET/MRI.

Authors:  Martin S Judenhofer; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.446

6.  An integrated quad-modality molecular imaging system for small animals.

Authors:  Yanye Lu; Kun Yang; Kedi Zhou; Bo Pang; Guohe Wang; Yichen Ding; Qiushi Zhang; Hongbin Han; Jiahe Tian; Changhui Li; Qiushi Ren
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 7.  Preclinical Multimodality Imaging in Vivo.

Authors:  David B Stout; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2009-06-21

8.  Performance evaluation of the eXplore speCZT preclinical imaging system.

Authors:  Ichiro Matsunari; Yoshiharu Miyazaki; Masato Kobayashi; Kodai Nishi; Asuka Mizutani; Keiichi Kawai; Akiko Hayashi; Ryoko Komatsu; Shoko Yonezawa; Seigo Kinuya
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 2.668

9.  Multimodality rodent imaging chambers for use under barrier conditions with gas anesthesia.

Authors:  Chris Suckow; Claudia Kuntner; Patrick Chow; Robert Silverman; Arion Chatziioannou; David Stout
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 10.  The role of preclinical SPECT in oncological and neurological research in combination with either CT or MRI.

Authors:  Monique R Bernsen; Pieter E B Vaissier; Roel Van Holen; Jan Booij; Freek J Beekman; Marion de Jong
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.