Literature DB >> 28839866

Antithrombotic drugs and non-variceal bleeding outcomes and risk scoring systems: comparison of Glasgow Blatchford, Rockall and Charlson scores.

Ali S Taha1,2, Caroline McCloskey1, Theresa Craigen1, Wilson J Angerson2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Antithrombotic drugs (ATDs) cause non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB). Risk scoring systems have not been validated in ATD users. We compared Blatchford, Rockall and Charlson scores in predicting outcomes of NVUGIB in ATD users and controls.
METHODS: A total of 2071 patients with NVUGIB were grouped into ATD users (n=851) and controls (n=1220) in a single-centre retrospective analysis. Outcomes included duration of hospital admission, the need for blood transfusion, rebleeding requiring surgery and 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: Duration of admission correlated with all scores in controls, but correlations were significantly weaker in ATD users. Rank correlation coefficients in control versus ATD: 0.45 vs 0.20 for Blatchford; 0.48 vs 0.32 for Rockall and 0.42 vs 0.26 for Charlson (all p<0.001). The need for transfusion was best predicted by Blatchford (p<0.001 vs Rockall and Charlson in both ATD users and controls), but all scores performed less well in ATD users. Area under the receiver operation characteristic curve (AUC) in control versus ATD: 0.90 vs 0.85 for Blatchford; 0.77 vs 0.61 for Rockall and 0.69 vs 0.56 for Charlson (all p<0.005). In predicting surgery, Rockall performed best; while mortality was best predicted by Charlson with lower AUCs in ATD patients than controls (p<0.05). Stratification showed the scores' performance to be age-dependent.
CONCLUSIONS: Blatchford score was the strongest predictor of transfusion, Rockall's had the strongest correlation with duration of admission and with rebleeding requiring surgery and Charlson was best in predicting 30-day mortality. Modifications of these systems should be explored to improve their efficiency in ATD users.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASPIRIN; BLEEDING PEPTIC ULCER; GASTROINTESTINAL BLEEDING; GASTROINTESTINAL HAEMORRHAGE

Year:  2016        PMID: 28839866      PMCID: PMC5369494          DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2015-100671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol        ISSN: 2041-4137


  15 in total

1.  Clinical outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding complicating low-dose aspirin and antithrombotic drugs.

Authors:  A S Taha; W J Angerson; R P Knill-Jones; O Blatchford
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 8.171

2.  Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, diagnoses and outcomes in the 2007 UK audit.

Authors:  Sarah A Hearnshaw; Richard F A Logan; Derek Lowe; Simon P L Travis; Mike F Murphy; Kelvin R Palmer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Multicentre comparison of the Glasgow Blatchford and Rockall Scores in the prediction of clinical end-points after upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  A J Stanley; H R Dalton; O Blatchford; D Ashley; C Mowat; A Cahill; D R Gaya; E Thompson; U Warshow; N Hare; M Groome; G Benson; W Murray
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 8.171

4.  Mortality following blood transfusion for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Ali S Taha; Caroline McCloskey; Theresa Craigen; Wilson J Angerson; Amir A Shah; Christopher G Morran
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-16

Review 5.  Challenges in the management of acute peptic ulcer bleeding.

Authors:  James Y W Lau; Alan Barkun; Dai-ming Fan; Ernst J Kuipers; Yun-sheng Yang; Francis K L Chan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

Authors:  O Blatchford; W R Murray; M Blatchford
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-10-14       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Upper gastrointestinal mucosal abnormalities and blood loss complicating low-dose aspirin and antithrombotic therapy.

Authors:  A S Taha; W J Angerson; R P Knill-Jones; O Blatchford
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 8.171

8.  Occult vs. overt upper gastrointestinal bleeding - inverse relationship and the use of mucosal damaging and protective drugs.

Authors:  A S Taha; C McCloskey; T Craigen; A Simpson; W J Angerson
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 8.171

9.  International consensus recommendations on the management of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Alan N Barkun; Marc Bardou; Ernst J Kuipers; Joseph Sung; Richard H Hunt; Myriam Martel; Paul Sinclair
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Comorbidities affect risk of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Authors:  Colin John Crooks; Joe West; Timothy Richard Card
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 22.682

View more
  2 in total

1.  Discharge of patients with an acute upper gastrointestinal bleed from the emergency department using an extended Glasgow-Blatchford Score.

Authors:  Thomas Banister; Josesph Spiking; Lakshmana Ayaru
Journal:  BMJ Open Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-08-30

2.  Risk Factors for Acute Coronary Syndrome in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding Patients.

Authors:  Tianyu Chi; Quchuan Zhao; Peili Wang
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 2.260

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.