OBJECTIVE: To elicit expert views to define the aims, optimal design, format and function of an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) multidisciplinary team (MDT) with the overall purpose of enhancing the quality of MDT-driven care within an IBD service provision. DESIGN: This study was a multicentre, prospective, qualitative study using a standard semistructured interview methodology. PARTICIPANTS: A multidisciplinary sample of 28 semistructured interviews of which there are six consultant colorectal surgeons, six IBD nurse specialists, seven consultant gastroenterologists, five consultant radiologists and four consultant histopathologists. SETTING: Participants were recruited from 10 hospitals, which were a mixture of community hospitals and specialist IBD centres between June and October 2013. RESULTS: Experts argued that the main goal of MDT-driven IBD care is to improve patient outcomes via sharing collective expertise in a formalised manner. Themes regarding the necessary requirements for an IBD MDT to occur included good attendance, proactive contribution, a need to define core members and appropriate and functional computer facilities. Emergent themes regarding the logistics of an effective IBD MDT included an eligibility criterion for case selection and discussion and appropriate scheduling. Themes regarding the overall design of the IBD MDT included a 'hub-and-spoke' model versus a 'single-centre' model. CONCLUSIONS: Defining key elements for an optimal design format for the IBD MDT is necessary to ensure quality of care and reduce variation in care standards. This study has produced a set of expert-based standards that can be used to structure the IBD MDT. These standards now require larger scale validation and consensus prior to becoming a practical guideline for the management of IBD care.
OBJECTIVE: To elicit expert views to define the aims, optimal design, format and function of an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) multidisciplinary team (MDT) with the overall purpose of enhancing the quality of MDT-driven care within an IBD service provision. DESIGN: This study was a multicentre, prospective, qualitative study using a standard semistructured interview methodology. PARTICIPANTS: A multidisciplinary sample of 28 semistructured interviews of which there are six consultant colorectal surgeons, six IBD nurse specialists, seven consultant gastroenterologists, five consultant radiologists and four consultant histopathologists. SETTING:Participants were recruited from 10 hospitals, which were a mixture of community hospitals and specialist IBD centres between June and October 2013. RESULTS: Experts argued that the main goal of MDT-driven IBD care is to improve patient outcomes via sharing collective expertise in a formalised manner. Themes regarding the necessary requirements for an IBD MDT to occur included good attendance, proactive contribution, a need to define core members and appropriate and functional computer facilities. Emergent themes regarding the logistics of an effective IBD MDT included an eligibility criterion for case selection and discussion and appropriate scheduling. Themes regarding the overall design of the IBD MDT included a 'hub-and-spoke' model versus a 'single-centre' model. CONCLUSIONS: Defining key elements for an optimal design format for the IBD MDT is necessary to ensure quality of care and reduce variation in care standards. This study has produced a set of expert-based standards that can be used to structure the IBD MDT. These standards now require larger scale validation and consensus prior to becoming a practical guideline for the management of IBD care.
Entities:
Keywords:
HEALTH SERVICE RESEARCH; IBD; IBD CLINICAL; IBD SURGERY
Authors: Sonja Eaker; Paul W Dickman; Vivan Hellström; Matthew M Zack; Johan Ahlgren; Lars Holmberg Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Leonard G Gomella; Jianqing Lin; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Patricia Dugan; Fran Guiles; Costas D Lallas; Jaspreet Singh; Peter McCue; Timothy Showalter; Richard K Valicenti; Adam Dicker; Edouard J Trabulsi Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Christopher M Byrne; Michael J Solomon; Jane M Young; Warwick Selby; James D Harrison Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: G Pellino; D S Keller; G M Sampietro; V Annese; M Carvello; V Celentano; C Coco; F Colombo; N Cracco; F Di Candido; M Franceschi; S Laureti; G Mattioli; L Pio; G Sciaudone; G Sica; V Villanacci; R Zinicola; S Leone; S Danese; A Spinelli; G Delaini; F Selvaggi Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2020-01-25 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Jeroen Geldof; Jean-Frédéric LeBlanc; Laura Lucaciu; Jonathan Segal; Charlie W Lees; Ailsa Hart Journal: Frontline Gastroenterol Date: 2020-11-11
Authors: Pritesh S Morar; James Hollingshead; Willem Bemelman; Nick Sevdalis; Thomas Pinkney; Graeme Wilson; Malcolm Dunlop; R Justin Davies; Richard Guy; Nicola Fearnhead; Steven Brown; Janindra Warusavitarne; Cathryn Edwards; Omar Faiz Journal: J Crohns Colitis Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 9.071