Literature DB >> 16365009

Regional differences in breast cancer survival despite common guidelines.

Sonja Eaker1, Paul W Dickman, Vivan Hellström, Matthew M Zack, Johan Ahlgren, Lars Holmberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite a uniform regional breast cancer care program, breast cancer survival differs within regions. We therefore examined breast cancer survival in relation to differences in diagnostic activity, tumor characteristics, and treatment in seven Swedish counties within a single health care region.
METHODS: We conducted a population-based observational study using a clinical breast cancer register in one Swedish health care region. Eligible women (n = 7,656) ages 40 to 69 years diagnosed with primary breast cancer between 1992 and 2002 were followed up until 2003. The 7-year relative survival ratio was used to estimate breast cancer survival. Excess mortality was modeled using Poisson regression to study differences in survival between counties.
RESULTS: The 7-year relative survival for breast cancer patients was significantly lower (up to 7% in absolute risk difference) in one county (county A) compared with the others. This difference existed only among women diagnosed before 1998, ages 50 to 59 years, and was strongest among stage II breast cancer patients. Adjustment for amount of diagnostic activity eliminated the survival differences among the counties. The amount of diagnostic activity was also lower in county A during the same time period. After county A, during 1997-1998, began to adhere strictly to the regional breast cancer care program, neither any survival differences nor diagnostic activity differences were observed. INTERPRETATIONS: Markers of diagnostic activity explained survival differences within our region, and the underlying mechanisms may be several. Low diagnostic activity may entail later diagnosis or inadequate characterization of the tumor and thereby missed treatment opportunities. Strengthening of multidisciplinary management of breast cancer can improve survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16365009     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  15 in total

1.  Development and testing of the cancer multidisciplinary team meeting observational tool (MDT-MOT).

Authors:  Jenny Harris; Cath Taylor; Nick Sevdalis; Rozh Jalil; James S A Green
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.038

2.  ReCAP: Impact of Multidisciplinary Care on Processes of Cancer Care: A Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Eberechukwu Onukwugha; Nicholas J Petrelli; Kathleen M Castro; James F Gardner; Jinani Jayasekera; Olga Goloubeva; Ming T Tan; Erica J McNamara; Howard A Zaren; Thomas Asfeldt; James D Bearden; Andrew L Salner; Mark J Krasna; Irene Prabhu Das; Steve B Clauser; Eberechukwu Onukwugha; Nicholas J Petrelli; Kathleen M Castro; James F Gardner; Jinani Jayasekera; Olga Goloubeva; Ming T Tan; Erica J McNamara; Howard A Zaren; Thomas Asfeldt; James D Bearden; Andrew L Salner; Mark J Krasna; Irene Prabhu Das; Steve B Clauser
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Defining the optimal design of the inflammatory bowel disease multidisciplinary team: results from a multicentre qualitative expert-based study.

Authors:  Pritesh Morar; Jamie Read; Sonal Arora; Ailsa Hart; Janindra Warusavitarne; James Green; Nick Sevdalis; Cathryn Edwards; Omar Faiz
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-26

4.  Investigation of low 5-year relative survival for breast cancer in a London cancer network.

Authors:  E A Davies; K M Linklater; V H Coupland; C Renshaw; J Toy; R Park; J Petit; C Housden; H Møller
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Estimating breast cancer-specific and other-cause mortality in clinical trial and population-based cancer registry cohorts.

Authors:  James J Dignam; Lan Huang; Lynn Ries; Marsha Reichman; Angela Mariotto; Eric Feuer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Using peer observers to assess the quality of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative proof of concept study.

Authors:  Jenny Harris; James Sa Green; Nick Sevdalis; Cath Taylor
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2014-08-11

7.  Geographic disparities in colorectal cancer survival.

Authors:  Kevin A Henry; Xiaoling Niu; Francis P Boscoe
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 3.918

8.  Establishing the aims, format and function for multidisciplinary team-driven care within an inflammatory bowel disease service: a multicentre qualitative specialist-based consensus study.

Authors:  Pritesh S Morar; Nick Sevdalis; Janindra Warusavitarne; Ailsa Hart; James Green; Cathryn Edwards; Omar Faiz
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-08-10

9.  Mobilising stakeholders to improve access to state-of-the-art radiotherapy in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Ndimofor Chofor; Pierre Bopda; Rebecca Bücker; Azeh Ivo; Ernest Okonkwo; Kra Joel; Zanzem Tung; Taofeeq Ige; Holger Wirtz; Wilfred Ngwa
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2021-05-10

Review 10.  Benefits of multidisciplinary teamwork in the management of breast cancer.

Authors:  Cath Taylor; Amanda Shewbridge; Jenny Harris; James S Green
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2013-08-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.