Literature DB >> 28838808

Characterization of structurally novel G protein biased CB1 agonists: Implications for drug development.

Benjamin M Ford1, Lirit N Franks2, Sherrica Tai3, William E Fantegrossi4, Edward L Stahl5, Michael D Berquist6, Christian V Cabanlong7, Catheryn D Wilson8, Narsimha R Penthala9, Peter A Crooks10, Paul L Prather11.   

Abstract

The human cannabinoid subtype 1 receptor (hCB1R) is highly expressed in the CNS and serves as a therapeutic target for endogenous ligands as well as plant-derived and synthetic cannabinoids. Unfortunately, acute use of hCB1R agonists produces unwanted psychotropic effects and chronic administration results in development of tolerance and dependence, limiting the potential clinical use of these ligands. Studies in β-arrestin knockout mice suggest that interaction of certain GPCRs, including μ-, δ-, κ-opioid and hCB1Rs, with β-arrestins might be responsible for several adverse effects produced by agonists acting at these receptors. Indeed, agonists that bias opioid receptor activation toward G-protein, relative to β-arrestin signaling, produce less severe adverse effects. These observations indicate that therapeutic utility of agonists acting at hCB1Rs might be improved by development of G-protein biased hCB1R agonists. Our laboratory recently reported a novel class of indole quinulidinone (IQD) compounds that bind cannabinoid receptors with relatively high affinity and act with varying efficacy. The purpose of this study was to determine whether agonists in this novel cannabinoid class exhibit ligand bias at hCB1 receptors. Our studies found that a novel IQD-derived hCB1 receptor agonist PNR-4-20 elicits robust G protein-dependent signaling, with transduction ratios similar to the non-biased hCB1R agonist CP-55,940. In marked contrast to CP-55,940, PNR-4-20 produces little to no β-arrestin 2 recruitment. Quantitative calculation of bias factors indicates that PNR-4-20 exhibits from 5.4-fold to 29.5-fold bias for G protein, relative to β-arrestin 2 signaling (when compared to G protein activation or inhibition of forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation, respectively). Importantly, as expected due to reduced β-arrestin 2 recruitment, chronic exposure of cells to PNR-4-20 results in significantly less desensitization and down-regulation of hCB1Rs compared to similar treatment with CP-55,940. PNR-4-20 (i.p.) is active in the cannabinoid tetrad in mice and chronic treatment results in development of less persistent tolerance and no significant withdrawal signs when compared to animals repeatedly exposed to the non-biased full agoinst JWH-018 or Δ9-THC. Finally, studies of a structurally similar analog PNR- 4-02 show that it is also a G protein biased hCB1R agonist. It is predicted that cannabinoid agonists that bias hCB1R activation toward G protein, relative to β-arrestin 2 signaling, will produce fewer and less severe adverse effects both acutely and chronically.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biased agonist; G protein-dependent signaling; G protein-independent signaling; Human cannabinoid type-1 receptor; Indole quinuclidine; Seven transmembrane receptors; β-Arrestin 2 recruitment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28838808      PMCID: PMC5849406          DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Res        ISSN: 1043-6618            Impact factor:   7.658


  90 in total

1.  Development of an enzyme immuno assay for the determination of porcine haptoglobin in various body fluids: testing the significance of meat juice measurements for quality monitoring programs.

Authors:  Stephanie Hiss; Susanne Knura-Deszczka; Gertraud Regula; Mark Hennies; Stefanie Gymnich; Brigitte Petersen; Helga Sauerwein
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 2.046

2.  Cannabinoid receptor agonists inhibit Ca current in NG108-15 neuroblastoma cells via a pertussis toxin-sensitive mechanism.

Authors:  M P Caulfield; D A Brown
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Deciphering biased-agonism complexity reveals a new active AT1 receptor entity.

Authors:  Aude Saulière; Morgane Bellot; Hervé Paris; Colette Denis; Frédéric Finana; Jonas T Hansen; Marie-Françoise Altié; Marie-Hélène Seguelas; Atul Pathak; Jakob L Hansen; Jean-Michel Sénard; Céline Galés
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 15.040

4.  Contrasting effects of different cannabinoid receptor ligands on mouse ingestive behaviour.

Authors:  Jonathan Grey; Phil Terry; Suzanne Higgs
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.293

5.  Synthetic Cannabinoids: Pharmacology, Behavioral Effects, and Abuse Potential.

Authors:  Sherrica Tai; William E Fantegrossi
Journal:  Curr Addict Rep       Date:  2014-06-01

6.  Low dose oral cannabinoid therapy reduces progression of atherosclerosis in mice.

Authors:  Sabine Steffens; Niels R Veillard; Claire Arnaud; Graziano Pelli; Fabienne Burger; Christian Staub; Meliha Karsak; Andreas Zimmer; Jean-Louis Frossard; François Mach
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Δ9-THC exposure attenuates aversive effects and reveals appetitive effects of K2/'Spice' constituent JWH-018 in mice.

Authors:  William S Hyatt; William E Fantegrossi
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.293

8.  Enhanced morphine analgesia in mice lacking beta-arrestin 2.

Authors:  L M Bohn; R J Lefkowitz; R R Gainetdinov; K Peppel; M G Caron; F T Lin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-12-24       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Behavioral methods in cannabinoid research.

Authors:  Ester Fride; Alex Perchuk; F Scott Hall; George R Uhl; Emmanuel S Onaivi
Journal:  Methods Mol Med       Date:  2006

Review 10.  Therapeutic potential of β-arrestin- and G protein-biased agonists.

Authors:  Erin J Whalen; Sudarshan Rajagopal; Robert J Lefkowitz
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 11.951

View more
  12 in total

1.  In vitro determination of the efficacy of illicit synthetic cannabinoids at CB1 receptors.

Authors:  Shivani Sachdev; Kiran Vemuri; Samuel D Banister; Mitchell Longworth; Michael Kassiou; Marina Santiago; Alexandros Makriyannis; Mark Connor
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  New Insights in Cannabinoid Receptor Structure and Signaling.

Authors:  Lingyan Ye; Zheng Cao; Weiwei Wang; Naiming Zhou
Journal:  Curr Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 3.339

3.  Metabolites of Synthetic Cannabinoid 5F-MDMB-PINACA Retain Affinity, Act as High Efficacy Agonists and Exhibit Atypical Pharmacodynamic Properties at CB1 Receptors.

Authors:  Christian V Cabanlong; Lauren N Russell; William E Fantegrossi; Paul L Prather
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.109

4.  Assessment of Biased Agonism among Distinct Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonist Scaffolds.

Authors:  Elise Wouters; Jolien Walraed; Michael Joseph Robertson; Max Meyrath; Martyna Szpakowska; Andy Chevigné; Georgios Skiniotis; Christophe Stove
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2019-11-04

5.  Reduced Tolerance and Asymmetrical Crosstolerance to Effects of the Indole Quinuclidinone Analog PNR-4-20, a G Protein-Biased Cannabinoid 1 Receptor Agonist in Mice: Comparisons with Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and JWH-018.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ford; Christian V Cabanlong; Sherrica Tai; Lirit N Franks; Narsimha R Penthala; Peter A Crooks; Paul L Prather; William E Fantegrossi
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 4.030

Review 6.  Therapeutic potential and safety considerations for the clinical use of synthetic cannabinoids.

Authors:  Dennis J Sholler; Marilyn A Huestis; Benjamin Amendolara; Ryan Vandrey; Ziva D Cooper
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Binding Modes and Selectivity of Cannabinoid 1 (CB1) and Cannabinoid 2 (CB2) Receptor Ligands.

Authors:  Jing-Fang Yang; Alexander H Williams; Narsimha R Penthala; Paul L Prather; Peter A Crooks; Chang-Guo Zhan
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.418

Review 8.  Cannabinoid Signaling in the Skin: Therapeutic Potential of the "C(ut)annabinoid" System.

Authors:  Kinga Fanni Tóth; Dorottya Ádám; Tamás Bíró; Attila Oláh
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 4.927

Review 9.  Targeting Cannabinoid Signaling in the Immune System: "High"-ly Exciting Questions, Possibilities, and Challenges.

Authors:  Attila Oláh; Zoltán Szekanecz; Tamás Bíró
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Atypical Pharmacodynamic Properties and Metabolic Profile of the Abused Synthetic Cannabinoid AB-PINACA: Potential Contribution to Pronounced Adverse Effects Relative to Δ9-THC.

Authors:  Rachel D Hutchison; Benjamin M Ford; Lirit N Franks; Catheryn D Wilson; Azure L Yarbrough; Ryoichi Fujiwara; Mark K Su; Denise Fernandez; Laura P James; Jeffery H Moran; Amy L Patton; William E Fantegrossi; Anna Radominska-Pandya; Paul L Prather
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 5.810

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.