| Literature DB >> 28838276 |
José Falantes1, Lisa Pleyer2,3,4, Sylvain Thépot5, António M Almeida6, Luca Maurillo7, Violeta Martínez-Robles8, Reinhard Stauder9, Raphael Itzykson10, Ricardo Pinto11, Adriano Venditti7, Joan Bargay12, Sonja Burgstaller13, María Pilar Martínez14, Valerie Seegers15, Emilia Cortesão16, María Ángeles Foncillas17, Claude Gardin15, Pau Montesinos18, Pellegrino Musto19, Pierre Fenaux10, Richard Greil2,3,4, Miguel Angel Sanz18, Fernando Ramos8,20.
Abstract
Azacitidine (AZA) prolonged overall survival (OS) in the AZA-AML-001 trial. However, few subjects were randomized to AZA or intensive chemotherapy (IC). The Medical Research Council (MRC) and the Leukemia Research Foundation (LRF) developed a score for older AML patients receiving IC or non-intensive regimens, whereas the E-ALMA study validated a score for survival and response in elderly patients receiving AZA in daily practice. Both identified three groups with different risk estimates. This analysis evaluates the efficacy of frontline AZA in older AML patients (N = 710) unfit for IC from different national registries (E-ALMA + series) stratified by the MRC/LRF risk score. Median OS of patients categorized as good, standard and poor-risk groups by the MRC/LRF score was 13.4 (95% CI, 10.8-16), 12.4 (95% CI, 9.9-14.8), and 8.1 months (95% CI, 7-9.1), respectively (p = .0001). In conclusion, this is the largest retrospective cohort of older AML patients treated with AZA.Entities:
Keywords: Acute myeloid leukemia; E-ALMA+; MRC/LRF risk score; azacitidine; elderly
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28838276 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1365854
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leuk Lymphoma ISSN: 1026-8022