Literature DB >> 33077867

Evolving treatment patterns and outcomes in older patients (≥60 years) with AML: changing everything to change nothing?

David Martínez-Cuadrón1,2, Josefina Serrano3, Cristina Gil4, Mar Tormo5, Pilar Martínez-Sánchez6, José A Pérez-Simón7, Raimundo García-Boyero8, Carlos Rodríguez-Medina9, María López-Pavía10, Celina Benavente11, Juan Bergua12, Esperanza Lavilla-Rubira13, María L Amigo14, Pilar Herrera15, Juan M Alonso-Domínguez16, Teresa Bernal17, Mercedes Colorado18, María J Sayas19, Lorenzo Algarra20, María B Vidriales21, Gabriela Rodríguez-Macías22, Susana Vives23, Manuel M Pérez-Encinas24, Aurelio López25, Víctor Noriega26, María García-Fortes27, Fernando Ramos28, Juan I Rodríguez-Gutiérrez29, Lisette Costilla-Barriga30, Jorge Labrador31, Blanca Boluda1, Rebeca Rodríguez-Veiga1, Joaquín Martínez-López2,6, Miguel A Sanz1,2, Pau Montesinos32,33.   

Abstract

There are no studies analyzing how therapeutic changes impact on outcomes of older AML patients. This study analyzes patient´s and disease characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of 3637 AML patients aged ≥60 years reported to the PETHEMA registry. Study periods were 1999-2006 (before hypomethylating agents-HMAs availability) vs 2007-2013, and treatments were intensive chemotherapy (IC), non-intensive, clinical trial (CT), and supportive care only (SC). Median age was 72 (range, 60-99), 57% male, median ECOG 1 (range, 0-4), secondary AML 914 (30%), with adverse-risk genetic in 720 (32%). Treatment differed between study periods (1999-2006 vs 2007-2013): IC 58% vs 32%, non-intensive 1 vs 23%, CT 0 vs 2%, SC 27 vs 28% (p < 0.001). Median OS was 4.7 months (1-year OS 29% and 5-years 7%, without differences between periods), 1.2 for SC, 7.8 for non-intensive, 8.6 for IC, and 10.4 for CT (p < 0.001). OS improved in the 2007-2013 period for IC patients (10.3 vs 7.5 months, p = 0.004), but worsened for SC patients (1.2 vs 1.6 months, p = 0.03). Our real-life study shows that, despite evolving treatment for elderly patients during the last decade, OS has remained unchanged. Epidemiologic registries will critically assess whether novel therapies lead to noteworthy advances in the near future (#NCT02606825).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33077867     DOI: 10.1038/s41375-020-01058-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


  38 in total

1.  A retrospective study evaluating treatment patterns and survival outcomes in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia treated in the United States with either 7+3 or a hypomethylating agent.

Authors:  Jill A Bell; Aaron Galaznik; Eileen Farrelly; Marlo Blazer; Sharanya Murty; Augustina Ogbonnaya; Michael Eaddy; Robert J Fram; Douglas V Faller; Vamsi K Kota
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.156

2.  Underrepresentation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer-treatment trials.

Authors:  L F Hutchins; J M Unger; J J Crowley; C A Coltman; K S Albain
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel.

Authors:  Hartmut Döhner; Elihu Estey; David Grimwade; Sergio Amadori; Frederick R Appelbaum; Thomas Büchner; Hervé Dombret; Benjamin L Ebert; Pierre Fenaux; Richard A Larson; Ross L Levine; Francesco Lo-Coco; Tomoki Naoe; Dietger Niederwieser; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Miguel Sanz; Jorge Sierra; Martin S Tallman; Hwei-Fang Tien; Andrew H Wei; Bob Löwenberg; Clara D Bloomfield
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  On the value of intensive remission-induction chemotherapy in elderly patients of 65+ years with acute myeloid leukemia: a randomized phase III study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Leukemia Group.

Authors:  B Löwenberg; R Zittoun; H Kerkhofs; U Jehn; J Abels; L Debusscher; C Cauchie; M Peetermans; G Solbu; S Suciu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Intensive treatment and trial participation in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients: A population-based analysis in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Burak Kalin; Esther N Pijnappel; Michel van Gelder; Otto Visser; Arjan A van de Loosdrecht; Gert J Ossenkoppele; Jan J Cornelissen; Avinash G Dinmohamed; Mojca Jongen-Lavrencic
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2018-10-20       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Durable Remissions with Ivosidenib in IDH1-Mutated Relapsed or Refractory AML.

Authors:  Courtney D DiNardo; Eytan M Stein; Stéphane de Botton; Gail J Roboz; Jessica K Altman; Alice S Mims; Ronan Swords; Robert H Collins; Gabriel N Mannis; Daniel A Pollyea; Will Donnellan; Amir T Fathi; Arnaud Pigneux; Harry P Erba; Gabrielle T Prince; Anthony S Stein; Geoffrey L Uy; James M Foran; Elie Traer; Robert K Stuart; Martha L Arellano; James L Slack; Mikkael A Sekeres; Christophe Willekens; Sung Choe; Hongfang Wang; Vickie Zhang; Katharine E Yen; Stephanie M Kapsalis; Hua Yang; David Dai; Bin Fan; Meredith Goldwasser; Hua Liu; Sam Agresta; Bin Wu; Eyal C Attar; Martin S Tallman; Richard M Stone; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Venetoclax combined with decitabine or azacitidine in treatment-naive, elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Courtney D DiNardo; Keith Pratz; Vinod Pullarkat; Brian A Jonas; Martha Arellano; Pamela S Becker; Olga Frankfurt; Marina Konopleva; Andrew H Wei; Hagop M Kantarjian; Tu Xu; Wan-Jen Hong; Brenda Chyla; Jalaja Potluri; Daniel A Pollyea; Anthony Letai
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Venetoclax plus LDAC for newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Andrew H Wei; Pau Montesinos; Vladimir Ivanov; Courtney D DiNardo; Jan Novak; Kamel Laribi; Inho Kim; Don A Stevens; Walter Fiedler; Maria Pagoni; Olga Samoilova; Yu Hu; Achilles Anagnostopoulos; Julie Bergeron; Jing-Zhou Hou; Vidhya Murthy; Takahiro Yamauchi; Andrew McDonald; Brenda Chyla; Sathej Gopalakrishnan; Qi Jiang; Wellington Mendes; John Hayslip; Panayiotis Panayiotidis
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 22.113

9.  Age and acute myeloid leukemia: real world data on decision to treat and outcomes from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry.

Authors:  Gunnar Juliusson; Petar Antunovic; Asa Derolf; Sören Lehmann; Lars Möllgård; Dick Stockelberg; Ulf Tidefelt; Anders Wahlin; Martin Höglund
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Randomized comparison of low dose cytarabine with or without glasdegib in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

Authors:  Jorge E Cortes; Florian H Heidel; Andrzej Hellmann; Walter Fiedler; B Douglas Smith; Tadeusz Robak; Pau Montesinos; Daniel A Pollyea; Pierre DesJardins; Oliver Ottmann; Weidong Wendy Ma; M Naveed Shaik; A Douglas Laird; Mirjana Zeremski; Ashleigh O'Connell; Geoffrey Chan; Michael Heuser
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2018-12-16       Impact factor: 11.528

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  CAR-T Cell Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Preclinical Rationale, Current Clinical Progress, and Barriers to Success.

Authors:  Salvatore Fiorenza; Cameron J Turtle
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 5.807

Review 2.  Role of Pharmacogenetics in the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Systematic Review and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Álvaro Pinto-Merino; Jorge Labrador; Pablo Zubiaur; Raquel Alcaraz; María José Herrero; Pau Montesinos; Francisco Abad-Santos; Miriam Saiz-Rodríguez
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 6.321

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.