Literature DB >> 28838155

Use of Dedicated Mobile Teams and Polio Volunteer Community Mobilizers to Increase Access to Zero-Dose Oral Poliovirus Vaccine and Routine Childhood Immunizations in Settlements at High Risk for Polio Transmission in Northern Nigeria.

Kennedy M Ongwae1, Samuel B Bawa2, Faisal Shuaib3, Fiona Braka2, Melissa Corkum4, Hammanyero K Isa2.   

Abstract

Background: The Polio Eradication Initiative in Nigeria, which started >20 years ago, faced many challenges, including initial denial, resistance from communities, and prolonged regional safety concerns. These challenges led into the structuring of the response including the development of the National Emergency Action Plan, improved partner coordination and government engagement, and the establishment of a Polio Emergency Operations Centre. Although monthly supplementary immunization activities (SIAs) continued, the targeting of settlements at high risk for polio transmission with routine immunization (RI) and other selected primary healthcare (PHC) services using dedicated mobile teams and volunteer community mobilizers (VCMs) became a key strategy for interrupting polio transmission in the high-risk areas. These efforts could have contributed to the wild poliovirus-free 2-year period between 24 July 2014 and 11 August 2016, when 2 cases of the virus were reported from Borno State, Northern Nigeria.
Methods: A narrative analysis of polio-related program and other official documents was conducted to identify the relevant human resources and their role in the Polio Eradication Initiative and in RI. The data used in the article was obtained from United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and World Health Organization project reports and a draft evaluation report of the dedicated mobile teams approach in Northern Nigeria.
Results: The data from 6 of the states that commenced the provision of polio, RI, and other selected PHC services using the dedicated mobile teams approach in 2014 showed an overall increase in the percentage of children aged 12-23 months in the settlements at high risk for polio transmission with a RI card seen, from 23% to 56%, and an overall increase in fully immunized children aged 12-23 months, from 19% to 55%. The number of newborns given the first dose of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) according to the RI schedule and the number of children given zero-dose OPV with the assistance of the VCMs similarly increased between 2013 and 2015. In 2015, VCMs helped track 167 092 newborns and also linked 156 537 infants aged <1 year to RI services in the 6 states. Conclusions: The analysis illustrates that polio personnel in Northern Nigeria are used in increasing access to zero-dose OPV, RI, and selected PHC services. The increase in the services generated represented the increasing role of the dedicated mobile teams and polio VCMs in strengthening RI.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  eradication; immunization; personnel; polio; resources; routine; settlements

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28838155      PMCID: PMC5853824          DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiw520

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Dis        ISSN: 0022-1899            Impact factor:   5.226


The Polio Eradication Initiative (PEI) in Nigeria experienced major setbacks, starting in 2003 with the initial widespread boycott of poliovirus vaccinations in some of the country's Northern states [1-3]. This transitioned into poorly executed supplementary immunization activities (SIAs), a continuation of anti-poliovirus vaccine sentiments, and reduced access to services after the escalation of insecurity in Northern Nigeria in 2009 [4]. The SIAs have historically been used to perform mass immunization campaigns as a strategy for increasing coverage of childhood immunizations in Nigeria. The resistance, which continued till 2012, was deeply rooted in rumors about the safety of the poliovirus vaccine, compounded by strong religious, cultural, and political positions [1-3]. Starting in 2012, the country made significant gains in polio eradication, but the progress was set back when the country reported 2 new cases of wild poliovirus from Borno State in Northern Nigeria on 11 August 2016, slightly more than 2 years since the last case in 2014 [5]. During the period starting in 2012–2013, the country recorded continued polio transmission and a large number of polio cases in 11 high-risk states: Kaduna, Katsina, Niger, Jigawa, Zamfara, Kebbi, Sokoto, Borno, Bauchi, Kano, and Yobe [2]. After 2013, the number of cases decreased until 24 July 2014, when the last case of wild poliovirus in Nigeria was reported in Kano State. This led to the removal of Nigeria from the list of polio-endemic countries in 2015, ushering in a new phase of heightened surveillance and action [4]. In 2012, the high-level oversight over government and partners' efforts in polio eradication was consolidated through the establishment of a Presidential Task Force on Polio Eradication [6, 7]. The task force reactivated the Expert Review Committee on Polio Eradication in 2012. The task force also ensured that better and more focused and accountable planning and implementation processes were put in place and community actions and linkages were intensified to eradicate polio. The PEI in Nigeria is supported by multiple planning processes, including the National Routine Immunization Strategic Plan 2013–2015, the Accountability Framework for Routine Immunization in Nigeria [8], and the Polio Endgame Strategic Plan 2013–2018 [9]. The objectives of the Polio Endgame Strategic Plan include polio detection and interruption, strengthening of routine immunization (RI) and the withdrawal of oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV), containment and certification of polio eradication, and polio legacy planning [9]. These strategies are further elaborated into yearly polio emergency plans [9]. The accountability framework is used to manage human and financial resources for the polio and RI program. As demonstrated through its application in Nigeria, the framework has the potential to improve staff performance and process indicators when used well [10]. Previous research on the impact of polio eradication activities on RI and primary healthcare (PHC) identified many missed opportunities [11]. To address some of the gaps, polio personnel in the form of dedicated mobile health teams and a network of volunteer community mobilizers (VCMs) are used to target settlements at high risk for polio transmission in Northern Nigeria. The equity-based intervention provide selected PHC services, including SIAs, to particularly hard-to-reach communities in the 12 states in Northern Nigeria with a high number of high-risk communities for polio transmission. This article seeks to demonstrate and justify the use of the dedicated mobile teams and polio VCMs to improve not only polio immunization but also RI and other PHC services in the underserved communities thought to be at high risk for polio transmission in 6 of the 12 states. Our study is based on the initial 6 states (Bauchi, Borno, Kaduna, Kano, Katsina, and Yobe) that started implementation of the dedicated mobile teams and polio VCM initiative in 2014 and were included in the baseline assessment of 2014 as well as in the midterm assessment of 2015. The other 6 states started the implementation of the initiative in 2015 and hence have limited experience to learn from.

METHODS

Review of Program Reports and Official Documents

The identification of dedicated mobile teams and polio VCMs was established through a review of program reports and official documents on polio eradication in the country. A narrative analysis of the documentation was conducted to assess the use of dedicated mobile teams and polio VCMs in relation to polio eradication, RI as well as in the provision of other related PHC services.

Review and Analysis of Data Generated From Services Offered by the Dedicated Mobile Teams and Polio VCMs

The dedicated mobile teams and polio VCMs provided polio eradication and RI related services. The data from the provision of these services was correlated and analyzed to generate trends according to the support provided to polio eradication and RI. In addition, baseline and midterm assessment of the services provided through the dedicated mobile teams and polio VCMs in the 6 Northern Nigeria states was used to assess the role of the polio personnel in increasing coverage for RI in the settlements at high risk for polio transmission. These settlements were preselected for intervention because of having a difficult terrain in combination with any of the following characteristics: locations of borders between wards, local government areas, or states; scattered households; inhabitation by nomadic population; location in a waterlogged or riverine area; difficulty in accessing healthcare facility; and the effects of general insecurity. The baseline assessment in May 2014 and the midterm assessment in November 2015 were conducted in 317 randomly selected settlements at high risk for polio transmission. In each settlement, a total of 10 households were randomly selected, and all children aged <5 years were eligible as the study population. The total population of children in this age group sampled in 2014 was 3873, compared with 4651 in 2015. As revealed through an independent sample t test, the variables of interest in these 2 samples did not differ significantly. For purposes of this study, unweighted averages will be used to report on the change in immunization cards seen as well as the full immunization status among children aged 12–23 months.

RESULTS

A total of 407 staff are supporting provision of dedicated mobile services in 3346 settlements at high risk for polio transmission, located in 480 wards and 98 local government areas in the 6 states (Table 1). A mobile team is made up of a nurse/midwife, 2 community health extension workers, a vaccinator, and a data clerk. The teams make quarterly visits to approximately 40 sites each in 3 months. The quarterly visits resulted in sufficient contact to achieve herd immunity against polio. The outreach team members provide integrated PHC services, which include polio and RI services. The service data generated by the teams is captured into the routine health management information system through the nearest PHC facility.
Table 1.

Local Government Areas (LGAs), Wards, and Settlements Covered by Dedicated Mobile Teams, by State, Nigeria 2014–2015a

StatePopulation in 2013Population in 2015LGAs, No.Wards, No.Settlements, No.Mobile Outreach Team Members, No.
Bauchi5 867 4996 213 42494976996
Borno5 208 4475 515 517177362072
Kaduna7 419 0707 811 161126340243
Kano11 698 68812 370 7482711943262
Katsina7 084 0037 458 3852110956259
Yobe2 931 4703 108 687126756175
Total40 209 17742 477 922984803346407

a Source: United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and World Health Organization project reports, 2016.

Local Government Areas (LGAs), Wards, and Settlements Covered by Dedicated Mobile Teams, by State, Nigeria 2014–2015a a Source: United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and World Health Organization project reports, 2016. We reviewed data for the percentage of children aged 12–23 months in the settlements at high risk for polio transmission with an RI card seen and fully immunized for age at the start of the outreach program in March 2014 and compared with data generated during the midterm assessment in November 2015 for the 6 states that commenced implementation of activities in 2014 (Bauchi, Borno, Kaduna, Kano, Katsina, and Yobe) (Figure 1). The data showed an overall average increase in the percentage of children aged 12–23 months in the settlements at high risk for polio transmission with a RI card seen, from 23% (234 of 1017; median, 23%; quartile 1, 16%; quartile 3, 27%) to 56% (710 of 1269; median, 59%; quartile 1, 39%; quartile 3, 63%) and an overall average increase in fully immunized children aged 12–23 months, from 19% (194 of 1017; median, 17%; quartile 1, 15%; quartile 3, 23%) to 55% (695 of 1269; median, 52%; quartile 1, 41%; quartile 3, 64%) (Figure 1). The increase in service delivery figures represents the contribution of the dedicated mobile teams and polio VCMs to the delivery of RI services.
Figure 1.

Percentage of children aged 12–23 months in the settlements at high risk for polio transmission seen with a routine immunization (RI) card and fully immunized for age at the start of the outreach program in March (Mar) 2014, compared with data generated in November (Nov) 2015. Source: Draft midterm evaluation of the project “Reaching Underserved and Isolated Communities in Northern Nigeria, 2016” (unpublished).

Percentage of children aged 12–23 months in the settlements at high risk for polio transmission seen with a routine immunization (RI) card and fully immunized for age at the start of the outreach program in March (Mar) 2014, compared with data generated in November (Nov) 2015. Source: Draft midterm evaluation of the project “Reaching Underserved and Isolated Communities in Northern Nigeria, 2016” (unpublished). Starting in 2013, resources from the polio eradication program were used to set up a network of VCMs in high-risk settlements in 12 states of Northern Nigeria at high risk of polio transmission. For purposes of this study, the services generated by the polio VCM network in the initial 6 states (Bauchi, Borno, Kaduna, Kano, Katsina, and Yobe) will be examined. The polio eradication program also involved traditional and religious leaders at all levels in a bid to minimize resistance to the poliovirus vaccine and mobilize communities for the services. The engagement helped diffuse the hostile environment for polio eradication in the face of rejection and insecurity based on then-prevailing cultural norms and religious practices. The strategy of involving community, religious leaders, and household heads was also used in the selection of VCMs in the communities. A VCM was identified from each of the settlements at high risk for polio transmission and trained on how to conduct household microcensus, home visits, administration of oral OPV, and tracking and linking of newborns with routine services in the nearby health facilities. Both the number of newborns reached with OPV0 (first dose of OPV according to the RI schedule) and zero-dose OPV (the first OPV dose for children aged >12 months who were not vaccinated according to the RI schedule) significantly increased between 2013 and 2015 (Table 2). The largest increase for OPV0 was seen in 2014, whereas zero-dose OPV showed a gradual increase.
Table 2.

VCMs and Newborns Given OPV0 or Zero-Dose OPV With the Assistance of VCMs, by State, Nigeria 2013–2015a

StateVCMs, No.Newborns Given OPV0 in the State With Assistance of VCMs, No.
Newborns Given Zero-Dose OPV With Assistance of VCMs, No.
Nov 2013Dec 2014Oct 2015Nov 2013Dec 2014Oct 2015
Bauchi450120 488167 508173 22577067655880
Borno74664 734114 88277 2691102778
Kaduna1613163 716226 613204 854243113 48227 786
Kano3808181 654355 774267 148742342 30178 680
Katsina2279153 692207 503177 437480727 72139 154
Yobe30028 86751 79438 77010935943946
Total9196713 1511 124 074938 70315 54193 873158 224

Abbreviations: OPV, oral poliovirus vaccine; OPV0, first dose of OPV according to the routine immunization schedule; VCMs, volunteer community mobilizers.

a Source: United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) VCM database.

VCMs and Newborns Given OPV0 or Zero-Dose OPV With the Assistance of VCMs, by State, Nigeria 2013–2015a Abbreviations: OPV, oral poliovirus vaccine; OPV0, first dose of OPV according to the routine immunization schedule; VCMs, volunteer community mobilizers. a Source: United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) VCM database. Following a similar trend, the mean number of infants aged <12 months receiving OPV per VCM by reporting period showed a general increase from 2013 to 2015. Most of the increase occurred in 2014, with a general slight reduction in 2015 (Figure 2). The slight reduction may reflect 2 months of missing data in 2015. Even so, the mean number of children provided with OPV0 per VCM per month increased from 8 in 2013 to 11 in both 2014 and 2015.
Figure 2.

The mean number of Nigerian newborns receiving oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) per volunteer community mobilizer (VCM) by reporting period and state. Source: United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) VCM database. Abbreviation: OPV0, first dose of OPV according to the routine immunization schedule.

The mean number of Nigerian newborns receiving oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) per volunteer community mobilizer (VCM) by reporting period and state. Source: United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) VCM database. Abbreviation: OPV0, first dose of OPV according to the routine immunization schedule. The mean number of children aged >12 months receiving zero-dose OPV per VCM by reporting period showed a general increase from 2013 to 2015. Most of the increase occurred between 2013 and 2014 (Figure 3). The VCMs in the settlement conducted home visits and tracked 167 092 newborns in 2015, compared with 103 700 in 2014, and they also linked 156 537 infants aged <1 year to RI in 2015, compared with 95 550 in 2014 (Table 3).
Figure 3.

The mean number of Nigerian children receiving zero-dose oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) per volunteer community mobilizer (VCM) by reporting period and state. Source: United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) VCM database.

Table 3.

VCMs, Newborns Tracked by VCMs, and Infants Aged <1 y Linked by VCMs to Facility for RI, by State, Nigeria 2013–2015a

StateVCMs, No.Newborns Tracked by VCMs, No.
Infants Aged <1 y Linked by VCMs to Facility for RI, No.
201320142015201320142015
Bauchi4509257442596477369645956
Borno7461162913161
Kaduna1613336816 66930 456286413 60828 439
Kano3808838244 24981 480794842 98578 933
Katsina2279630730 95141 754503428 50139 614
Yobe300116437345259634863594
Total919619 099103 700167 09216 71695 550156 537

Abbreviations: RI, routine immunization; VCMs, volunteer community mobilizers.

a Source: United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) VCM database.

VCMs, Newborns Tracked by VCMs, and Infants Aged <1 y Linked by VCMs to Facility for RI, by State, Nigeria 2013–2015a Abbreviations: RI, routine immunization; VCMs, volunteer community mobilizers. a Source: United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) VCM database. The mean number of Nigerian children receiving zero-dose oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) per volunteer community mobilizer (VCM) by reporting period and state. Source: United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) VCM database.

DISCUSSION

As in other countries, the network of human resources engaged for polio eradication in Nigeria is large [12-15]. During the initial years of PEI, the contribution of the eradication efforts toward other health outcomes was little understood and largely unexploited [12, 13]. In later years, however, greater interest in and exploitation of the polio assets for other health outcomes started emerging in the literature. The quality and frequency of immunization activities combined to help prevent poliovirus transmission in the high-risk area of Northwest Nigeria, and the scaling up of RI for undervaccinated populations demonstrated the potential to increase population immunity, hence decreasing the need for SIAs [16]. Other related research findings also support the view that increased RI coverage reduces the incidence of polio and makes eradication feasible [17]. The targeting of high-risk areas and populations increased poliovirus vaccination coverage in Ethiopia, India, and Angola [18]. In the case of Nigeria, some of the existing polio personnel are used to increase access to poliovirus vaccination, RI, and selected high-impact PHC services in particular settlements at high risk for polio transmission. The main service package is made up of RI for the infants aged <1 year, and supplementary immunization for other children aged <5 years, including poliovirus vaccinations. The other interventions provided to this age population include vitamin A, deworming, screening for malnutrition, treatment of diarrhea with zinc and low-osmolality oral rehydration salts, treatment of malaria and pneumonia, and treatment of other minor ailments. Pregnant women are provided with antenatal care services, including tetanus toxoid vaccination, intermittent preventive therapy for malaria, iron and folate, and the promotion of key household practices. It has been observed that better synergy with PEI can increase vitamin A coverage, encourage the provision of better laboratory services, and improve community linkages [13]. This article offers evidence on the use of polio personnel to increase immunization coverage, delivery of other basic PHC services, and improved community linkages. Over a period of 21 months, the percentage of children aged 12–23 months seen with a RI card increased from a mere 19% to 49%. Full immunization coverage went up by a similar margin during the same period, from 16% to 50%. The increase in routine coverage was significant but still lower than the expected coverage of >80%, an indication that more efforts are needed to cover the gap. In addition, the performance of the dedicated mobile teams and polio VCMs should be analyzed to identify bottlenecks preventing the program from achieving the desired level of coverage. The selected settlements at high risk for polio transmission were also provided with a community-based services delivery platform used for community social mobilization and demand generation. The network of 9196 VCMs in the 6 states delivered increasing OPV0 doses, from a mean of 78 per VCM in 2013 to 122 in 2014 and 102 in 2015. The mean number of children receiving zero-dose OPV per VCM increased from 2 in 2013 to 17 in 2015. The use of polio personnel reached newborns in the settlements at high risk for polio transmission in ways that have previously not been demonstrated. The VCMs conduct routine home visits, with particular emphasis on homes with pregnant women or newly delivered newborns. The provision of OPV0 to newborns complements the provision of RI services by the mobile teams that reach each of the settlements on a quarterly basis, whereas the zero-dose OPV complements the SIAs. The linking of newborns to facilities for RI is a demand generation intervention for RI and other newborn-related PHC services. The range of services beyond poliovirus vaccination provided using polio resources reinforces the integration and strengthening of PHC as a sustainable delivery mechanism for RI and other related PHC services. That it is possible to provide these services in the settlements at high risk for polio transmission is evidence that targeting these settlements is possible, assuming an integrated approach for increased access to services works. The analysis of the use of polio personnel for RI demonstrates the existing use of the resources, including the gains that are being made. The analysis also highlights opportunities that could be used to increase targeting and provision of integrated services. The VCM structure needs to be considered for scale-up as part of PHC approach in hard-to-reach communities, especially because of its potential to reach newborns in a country with a slowly declining mortality rate in children aged <5 years and stagnated progress with neonatal mortality rates. Given that Nigeria still has to focus on polio eradication after reporting 2 new cases in August 2016, the dedicated mobile teams and VCMs will continue with their focus on polio eradication. Our study had some limitations. Its findings are based on data collected in settlements at high risk of polio transmission, different from the average settlements in the respective states. Given the distinct nature of the settlements, the study findings may not be generalizable for the entire state. Furthermore, the dedicated mobile teams and the VCMs are not part of the normal health system structure, so their performance as assessed in the study does not reflect the performance of the entire health system and should therefore not be interpreted as such. This study sourced some data from government and United Nations agencies documents. The quality of these data sources may not be guaranteed, because these sources are not always subjected to rigorous quality assurance.
  11 in total

1.  Impact of targeted programs on health systems: a case study of the polio eradication initiative.

Authors:  Benjamin Loevinsohn; Bruce Aylward; Robert Steinglass; Ellyn Ogden; Tracey Goodman; Bjorn Melgaard
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Polio eradication: mobilizing and managing the human resources.

Authors:  R Bruce Aylward; Jennifer Linkins
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2005-04-25       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Impact of supplemental immunisation activity (SIA) campaigns on health systems: findings from South Africa.

Authors:  Stéphane Verguet; Waasila Jassat; Melanie Y Bertram; Stephen M Tollman; Christopher J L Murray; Dean T Jamison; Karen J Hofman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Polio Eradication Initiative contribution in strengthening immunization and integrated disease surveillance data management in WHO African region, 2014.

Authors:  Alain Poy; Etienne Minkoulou; Keith Shaba; Ali Yahaya; Peter Gaturuku; Landoh Dadja; Joseph Okeibunor; Richard Mihigo; Pascal Mkanda
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Progress toward poliomyelitis eradication in Nigeria.

Authors:  J Mohammed Ado; Andrew Etsano; Faisal Shuaib; Eunice Damisa; Pascal Mkanda; Alex Gasasira; Richard Banda; Charles Korir; Ticha Johnson; Boubacar Dieng; Melissa Corkum; Ogu Enemaku; Noah Mataruse; Chima Ohuabunwo; Shahzad Baig; Michael Galway; Vincent Seaman; Eric Wiesen; John Vertefeuille; Ikechukwu U Ogbuanu; Gregory Armstrong; Frank J Mahoney
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Combinations of Quality and Frequency of Immunization Activities to Stop and Prevent Poliovirus Transmission in the High-Risk Area of Northwest Nigeria.

Authors:  Radboud J Duintjer Tebbens; Mark A Pallansch; Steven G F Wassilak; Stephen L Cochi; Kimberly M Thompson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The final push for polio eradication: addressing the challenge of violence in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Nigeria.

Authors:  Seye Abimbola; Asmat Ullah Malik; Ghulam Farooq Mansoor
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 8.  Listening to the rumours: what the northern Nigeria polio vaccine boycott can tell us ten years on.

Authors:  Isaac Ghinai; Chris Willott; Ibrahim Dadari; Heidi J Larson
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2013-12-03

9.  Assessing the effectiveness of house-to-house visits on routine oral polio immunization completion and tracking of defaulters.

Authors:  Dora Ward Curry; Henry B Perry; Syed N Tirmizi; Allison L Goldstein; Meg C Lynch
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  Implementation of a Systematic Accountability Framework in 2014 to Improve the Performance of the Nigerian Polio Program.

Authors:  Sisay G Tegegne; Pascal MKanda; Yared G Yehualashet; Tesfaye B Erbeto; Kebba Touray; Peter Nsubuga; Richard Banda; Rui G Vaz
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 5.226

View more
  8 in total

1.  Strengthening vaccination delivery system resilience in the context of protracted humanitarian crisis: a realist-informed systematic review.

Authors:  Sharif A Ismail; Sze Tung Lam; Sadie Bell; Fouad M Fouad; Karl Blanchet; Josephine Borghi
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-10-23       Impact factor: 2.908

2.  Determining Inaccurate Coordinates in Electronic Data Collection for Surveillance and Immunization Supportive Supervision: A Case Study of Nigeria EPI Supportive Supervision Module.

Authors:  Isah Mohammed Bello; Godwin Ubong Akpan; Abdulsalam Yau Gital; Musa Iliyasu; Danlami Mohammed; Faysal Shehu Barau; Daniel Oyaole Rasheed; Erbeto Tesfaye Bedada; Sylvester Maleghemi
Journal:  Front Digit Health       Date:  2022-06-09

3.  Transition Planning For After Polio Eradication.

Authors:  Paul D Rutter; Alan R Hinman; Lea Hegg; Dennis King; Stephen Sosler; Virginia Swezy; Ann-Lee Hussey; Stephen L Cochi
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Addressing the Challenges and Opportunities of the Polio Endgame: Lessons for the Future.

Authors:  Manish Patel; Stephen Cochi
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Using the polio programme to deliver primary health care in Nigeria: implementation research.

Authors:  Samuel Bawa; Christine McNab; Loveday Nkwogu; Fiona Braka; Esther Obinya; Michael Galway; Andrew J Mirelman; Kulchumi Isa Hammanyero; Garba Safiyanu; Martin Chukwuji; Kennedy Ongwae; Pascal Mkanda; Melissa Corkum; Lea Hegg; Deanna Tollefson; Sani Umar; Sunday Audu; Hassan Gunda; Modu Chinta; Anne Eudes Jean Baptiste; Murtala Bagana; Faisal Shuaib
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  Contributions of Volunteer Community Mobilizers to Polio Eradication in Nigeria: The Experiences of Non-governmental and Civil Society Organizations.

Authors:  Janefrancis Ijeoma Duru; Samuel Usman; Opeyemi Adeosun; Katherine V Stamidis; Lydia Bologna
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.345

Review 7.  Community health workers in humanitarian settings: Scoping review.

Authors:  Nathan P Miller; Farid Bagheri Ardestani; Hannah Sarah Dini; Fouzia Shafique; Nureyan Zunong
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.413

Review 8.  Zero- or missed-dose children in Nigeria: Contributing factors and interventions to overcome immunization service delivery challenges.

Authors:  Kurayi Mahachi; Joss Kessels; Kofi Boateng; Anne Eudes Jean Baptiste; Pamela Mitula; Ebru Ekeman; Laura Nic Lochlainn; Alexander Rosewell; Samir V Sodha; Bernadette Abela-Ridder; Albis Francesco Gabrielli
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 4.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.