Literature DB >> 28838130

Validation of Photoplethysmography-Based Sleep Staging Compared With Polysomnography in Healthy Middle-Aged Adults.

Pedro Fonseca1,2, Tim Weysen1, Maaike S Goelema1,3, Els I S Møst1, Mustafa Radha1,2, Charlotte Lunsingh Scheurleer1,3, Leonie van den Heuvel1, Ronald M Aarts1,2.   

Abstract

Study
Objectives: To compare the accuracy of automatic sleep staging based on heart rate variability measured from photoplethysmography (PPG) combined with body movements measured with an accelerometer, with polysomnography (PSG) and actigraphy.
Methods: Using wrist-worn PPG to analyze heart rate variability and an accelerometer to measure body movements, sleep stages and sleep statistics were automatically computed from overnight recordings. Sleep-wake, 4-class (wake/N1 + N2/N3/REM) and 3-class (wake/NREM/REM) classifiers were trained on 135 simultaneously recorded PSG and PPG recordings of 101 healthy participants and validated on 80 recordings of 51 healthy middle-aged adults. Epoch-by-epoch agreement and sleep statistics were compared with actigraphy for a subset of the validation set.
Results: The sleep-wake classifier obtained an epoch-by-epoch Cohen's κ between PPG and PSG sleep stages of 0.55 ± 0.14, sensitivity to wake of 58.2 ± 17.3%, and accuracy of 91.5 ± 5.1%. κ and sensitivity were significantly higher than with actigraphy (0.40 ± 0.15 and 45.5 ± 19.3%, respectively). The 3-class classifier achieved a κ of 0.46 ± 0.15 and accuracy of 72.9 ± 8.3%, and the 4-class classifier, a κ of 0.42 ± 0.12 and accuracy of 59.3 ± 8.5%. Conclusions: The moderate epoch-by-epoch agreement and, in particular, the good agreement in terms of sleep statistics suggest that this technique is promising for long-term sleep monitoring, although more evidence is needed to understand whether it can complement PSG in clinical practice. It also offers an improvement in sleep/wake detection over actigraphy for healthy individuals, although this must be confirmed on a larger, clinical population. © Sleep Research Society 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Sleep Research Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Photoplethysmography; actigraphy; computerized analysis; heart rate variability; scoring; sleep tracker; statistics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28838130     DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsx097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sleep        ISSN: 0161-8105            Impact factor:   5.849


  30 in total

1.  Agreement between actigraphic and polysomnographic measures of sleep in adults with and without chronic conditions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Samantha Conley; Andrea Knies; Janene Batten; Garrett Ash; Brienne Miner; Youri Hwang; Sangchoon Jeon; Nancy S Redeker
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2019-05-13       Impact factor: 11.609

2.  An unbiased, efficient sleep-wake detection algorithm for a population with sleep disorders: change point decoder.

Authors:  Ayse S Cakmak; Giulia Da Poian; Adam Willats; Ammer Haffar; Rami Abdulbaki; Yi-An Ko; Amit J Shah; Viola Vaccarino; Donald L Bliwise; Christopher Rozell; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 3.  Sensors Capabilities, Performance, and Use of Consumer Sleep Technology.

Authors:  Massimiliano de Zambotti; Nicola Cellini; Luca Menghini; Michela Sarlo; Fiona C Baker
Journal:  Sleep Med Clin       Date:  2020-01-03

4.  Validation of sleep measurement in a multisensor consumer grade wearable device in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Jennifer C Kanady; Leslie Ruoff; Laura D Straus; Jonathan Varbel; Thomas Metzler; Anne Richards; Sabra S Inslicht; Aoife O'Donovan; Jennifer Hlavin; Thomas C Neylan
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 4.062

5.  Validation of Fitbit Charge 2 and Fitbit Alta HR Against Polysomnography for Assessing Sleep in Adults With Obstructive Sleep Apnea.

Authors:  Fernando Moreno-Pino; Alejandro Porras-Segovia; Pilar López-Esteban; Antonio Artés; Enrique Baca-García
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.062

Review 6.  Wearable Sleep Technology in Clinical and Research Settings.

Authors:  Massimiliano de Zambotti; Nicola Cellini; Aimée Goldstone; Ian M Colrain; Fiona C Baker
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Artificial intelligence in sleep medicine: background and implications for clinicians.

Authors:  Cathy A Goldstein; Richard B Berry; David T Kent; David A Kristo; Azizi A Seixas; Susan Redline; M Brandon Westover
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.062

8.  Transfer learning from ECG to PPG for improved sleep staging from wrist-worn wearables.

Authors:  Qiao Li; Qichen Li; Ayse S Cakmak; Giulia Da Poian; Donald L Bliwise; Viola Vaccarino; Amit J Shah; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.833

9.  The accuracy of the THIM wearable device for estimating sleep onset latency.

Authors:  Hannah Scott; Ashwin Whitelaw; Alex Canty; Nicole Lovato; Leon Lack
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 4.062

10.  Evaluating consumer and clinical sleep technologies: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine update.

Authors:  Sharon Schutte-Rodin; Maryann C Deak; Seema Khosla; Cathy A Goldstein; Michael Yurcheshen; Ambrose Chiang; Dominic Gault; Joseph Kern; Daniel O'Hearn; Scott Ryals; Nitun Verma; Douglas B Kirsch; Kelly Baron; Steven Holfinger; Jennifer Miller; Ruchir Patel; Sumit Bhargava; Kannan Ramar
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 4.062

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.