Literature DB >> 28836935

MicroRNA-mediated responses to long-term magnesium-deficiency in Citrus sinensis roots revealed by Illumina sequencing.

Wei-Wei Liang1, Jing-Hao Huang1,2, Chun-Ping Li1, Lin-Tong Yang1, Xin Ye1, Dan Lin1, Li-Song Chen3,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Magnesium (Mg)-deficiency occurs most frequently in strongly acidic, sandy soils. Citrus are grown mainly on acidic and strong acidic soils. Mg-deficiency causes poor fruit quality and low fruit yield in some Citrus orchards. For the first time, we investigated Mg-deficiency-responsive miRNAs in 'Xuegan' (Citrus sinensis) roots using Illumina sequencing in order to obtain some miRNAs presumably responsible for Citrus Mg-deficiency tolerance.
RESULTS: We obtained 101 (69) miRNAs with increased (decreased) expression from Mg-starved roots. Our results suggested that the adaptation of Citrus roots to Mg-deficiency was related to the several aspects: (a) inhibiting root respiration and related gene expression via inducing miR158 and miR2919; (b) enhancing antioxidant system by down-regulating related miRNAs (miR780, miR6190, miR1044, miR5261 and miR1151) and the adaptation to low-phosphorus (miR6190); (c) activating transport-related genes by altering the expression of miR6190, miR6485, miR1044, miR5029 and miR3437; (d) elevating protein ubiquitination due to decreased expression levels of miR1044, miR5261, miR1151 and miR5029; (e) maintaining root growth by regulating miR5261, miR6485 and miR158 expression; and (f) triggering DNA repair (transcription regulation) by regulating miR5176 and miR6485 (miR6028, miR6190, miR6485, miR5621, miR160 and miR7708) expression. Mg-deficiency-responsive miRNAs involved in root signal transduction also had functions in Citrus Mg-deficiency tolerance.
CONCLUSIONS: We obtained several novel Mg-deficiency-responsive miRNAs (i.e., miR5261, miR158, miR6190, miR6485, miR1151 and miR1044) possibly contributing to Mg-deficiency tolerance. These results revealed some novel clues on the miRNA-mediated adaptation to nutrient deficiencies in higher plants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Citrus sinensis; Illumina sequencing; Magnesium-deficiency; Root; miRNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28836935      PMCID: PMC5571589          DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-3999-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


Background

Magnesium (Mg)-deficiency, a common problem in many agricultural crops, occurs most frequently in strongly acidic, sandy soils, where Mg is very prone to leaching [1]. Citrus are grown mainly on acidic and strong acidic soils and Mg-deficiency is responsible for the poor fruit quality and the reduction in fruit yield in some Citrus orchards [2]. According to our investigation in 2011, over 90% and 77% of Citrus grandis orchard soils from Pinghe county, Fujian province had a pH less than 5.0 and a soil exchange Mg content less than the optimum range, respectively [3]. What’s worse, crop Mg-deficiency, which is becoming more and more popular due to soil acidification and improper farmer practices such as intensive crop production systems and highly fortified rotation, has been considered to be an urgent agricultural problem [3, 4]. Although Mg is one of the most important nutrients in higher plants and plays essential roles in numerous cellular processes such as chlorophyll biosynthesis, gas exchanges [2, 5–7], conformational stabilization of proteins, nucleic acids, cell walls and membranes [8], partitioning and utilization of photoassimilates [7, 9], activation of enzymes [9, 10] and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation [9]. Despite the important roles of Mg in higher plants, Mg has been less paid attention by agronomists and botanists relative to the other nutrients and is considered to be “the forgotten element” [4, 11]. Therefore, it is very important to elucidate the molecular mechanisms on Mg-deficiency impairments and tolerance in higher plants. To our knowledge, such data are rare [10, 12, 13]. Evidence demonstrates that microRNA (miRNA)-mediated posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression plays a role in plant adaptive responses to deficiencies of phosphorus (P), potassium (K), nitrogen (N), sulfur (S), manganese (Mn), boron (B), zinc (Zn) and iron (Fe) [14-20]. Numerous differentially expressed miRNAs have been isolated from P-starved Arabidopsis, white lupin, Medicago truncatula, common bean, rice, barley, tomato and soybean [21-25]. The roles of P-deficiency-induced up-regulation of plant miR399 and miR827 in the maintenance of P homeostasis via inhibiting their targets ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme E2 24 (UBC24) and N limitation adaptation (NLA), respectively have been well characterized [14, 23, 26, 27]. Nitrogen-deficiency-induced alterations of miRNA profiles have been reported on several higher plants including maize, Arabidopsis, soybean, common bean [20, 24, 25, 28, 29]. Several N-deficiency-responsive miRNAs have been characterized in some details. For example, root modulation under N-deficiency was coordinated by miR160, miR167 and miR171 and root growth was promoted by down-regulating miR167 expression and up-regulating miR160 and miR171 expression [24, 28]. N-deficiency-induced down-regulation of miR169 has been demonstrated to be an adaptive strategy of plants to N-starvation via N-uptake and remobilization [24, 30]. Despite the vital roles of K in higher plants, little is known about K-deficiency-responsive miRNAs. In a study, Yan et al. [31] examined K-deficiency-induced alterations in expression of miR444a and its targets (i.e., MADS-57, MADS-27b, MADS-27a and MADS-23) in rice roots, and found that miR444a was slightly down-regulated and MADS-23 was greatly up-regulated. In addition, many differentially expressed miRNAs have been identified in B-deprived C. sinensis roots and leaves [17, 18], Cu-starved [32] and Fe-deficient [33] Arabidopsis, S-deprived Brassica rapus [34], Mn-limited Phaseolus vulgaris [25] and Zn-deficient Sorghum bicolor [35]. Although the effects of nutrient deficiencies on miRNA expression in higher plants have been explored by some workers, most of these studies have been paid to herbaceous plants. Little is known about Mg-deficiency-induced alterations of miRNA expression in woody plants. Previously, we examined Mg-deficiency-responsive miRNAs in C. sinensis leaves revealed by Illumina sequencing and identified 71 down- and 75 up-regulated miRNAs, implying the potential roles of miRNAs in Citrus Mg-deficiency tolerance [36]. On this basis, we used Illumina sequencing to sequence two small RNA libraries from Mg-sufficient (control) and -deficient C. sinensis roots in order to distinguish the differences in Mg-deficiency-induced alterations of miRNA profiles between C. sinensis roots and leaves and to obtain some miRNAs presumably responsible for Citrus Mg-deficiency tolerance.

Results

Root dry weight (DW) and root and leaf Mg

Root DW and root and leaf Mg levels were lower in 0 mM Mg-treated seedlings than in 1 mM Mg-treated ones, and Mg level in leaves from 0 mM Mg-treated seedlings was much less than the sufficient range (Fig. 1) [37]. Based on these data and our previous reports [6, 12], these seedlings submitted to 0 and 1 mM Mg were regarded as Mg-deficient and -sufficient (control), respectively.
Fig. 1

Root DW (a), root (b) and leaf (c) Mg concentrations in response to Mg-deficiency. Bars represent mean ± SD (n = 5 for root and leaf Mg and 9 for root DW). Different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference at P < 0.05

Root DW (a), root (b) and leaf (c) Mg concentrations in response to Mg-deficiency. Bars represent mean ± SD (n = 5 for root and leaf Mg and 9 for root DW). Different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference at P < 0.05

Illumina sequencing and miRNA annotation

Using high-throughput sequencing, we got 20,726,716 (22,139,574) raw reads from sRNA library constructed from control (Mg-deficient) roots. After the adaptors, low quality tags and contaminants being removed, the control and Mg-deficient root sRNA libraries generated 20,325,777 (5,561,214) and 21,783,568 (6,124,980) clear reads (unique reads), respectively (Table 1). As shown in Fig. 2, the majority of the clear reads fell within the range of 18–25 nt. The most abundant clear reads were 24 nt length, followed by 21, 22, 23 and 20 nt length. This agrees with the previous data obtained on leaves, roots [17, 18] and fruits [38] of C. sinensis, and fruits and flowers of Citrus trifoliata [39]. Therefore, these data obtained via high-throughput sequencing of sRNA libraries are reliable. Mg-deficiency increased and decreased the abundances of 24 and 21 nt reads, respectively.
Table 1

Summary of sRNA sequencing data from Mg-sufficient and -deficient Citrus sinensis roots

Mg-sufficiencyMg-deficiency
Unique sRNAsTotal sRNAsUnique sRNAsTotal sRNAs
Raw reads20,726,71622,139,574
Clear reads5,561,214(100%)20,325,777(100%)6,124,980(100%)21,783,568(100%)
Mapped to genomic3,077,845(55.34%)13,624,836(67.03%)3,378,231(55.15%)14,510,776(66.61%)
ᅟExon antisense47,462(0.85%)176,617(0.87%)50,014(0.82%)177,516(0.81%)
ᅟExon sense105,888(1.90%)358,233(1.76%)117,753(1.92%)372,942(1.71%)
ᅟIntron antisense65,331(1.17%)281,377(1.38%)71,109(1.16%)294,537(1.35%)
ᅟIntron sense88,455(1.59%)520,695(2.56%)94,926(1.55%)557,578(2.55%)
ᅟmiRNA54,043(0.97%)3,125,403(15.37%)53,522(0.87%)3,364,650(15.45%)
ᅟrRNA125,351(2.25%)2,205,674(10.85%)157,937(2.58%)2,558,877(11.74%)
ᅟrepeat1384(0.02%)3652(0.02%)1587(0.03%)3946(0.02%)
ᅟsnRNA2722(0.05%)9423(0.05%)3188(0.05%)10,142(0.05%)
ᅟsnoRNA1667(0.03%)6123(0.03%)1833(0.03%)6354(0.03%)
ᅟtRNA18,177(0.33%)767,772(3.78%)22,291(0.36%)660,793(3.03%)
ᅟUnannotated sRNAs5,050,734(90.82%)12,870,808(63.32%)5,550,820(90.63%)13,776,233(63.24%)
Fig. 2

Small RNA length distribution from Mg-deficient and -sufficient C. sinensis roots

Summary of sRNA sequencing data from Mg-sufficient and -deficient Citrus sinensis roots Small RNA length distribution from Mg-deficient and -sufficient C. sinensis roots Here, 13,624,836 clean reads (3,077,845 unique reads) from Mg-sufficient roots and 14,510,776 clear reads (3,378,231 unique reads) from Mg-deficient roots were mapped to C. sinensis genome (JGIversion1.1, http://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html#!info?alias=Org_Csinensis) using SOAP [40]. Thereafter, we used the unannotated 5,050,734 and 5,550,820 unique reads from Mg-sufficient and -deficient roots, respectively to predict novel miRNAs (Table 1).

Identification and prediction of root miRNAs

As shown in Additional file 1, we identified 733 known miRNAs in C. sinensis roots. To avert false results due to the use of low abundant miRNAs, these known miRNAs with a transcript per million (TPM) value <10 in both Mg-sufficient and -deficient roots were not utilized for further analysis [17, 41]. The remained 300 miRNAs with a TPM value ≥10 in Mg-sufficient and/or -deficient roots were utilized for Mg-deficiency-responsive miRNA analysis (Additional file 2). As shown in Additional file 3, we obtained 71 up- and 54 down-regulated known miRNAs from Mg-deficient roots. As shown in Additional files 4, 5, and 6, we identified 181 novel miRNAs in both Mg-sufficient and -deficient roots, and 30 up- and 15 down-regulated novel miRNAs in Mg-deficient roots with a TPM value ≥ ten in Mg-deficient and/or -sufficient roots.

Validation of sequencing data by stem-loop qRT-PCR

The expression levels of 27 Mg-deficiency-responsive miRNAs were assayed by stem-loop qRT-PCR. Except for miR1222, the expression patterns of all miRNAs obtained by stem-loop qRT-PCR and Illumiona sequencing were similar (Fig. 3 and Table 2). Thus, the results produced by Illumiona sequencing were reliable.
Fig. 3

Relative expression levels of selected Mg-deficiency-responsive known miRNAs in Mg-deficient and control roots revealed by qRT-PCR. Bars represent mean ± SD (n = 3). For the same miRNA, different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference at P < 0.05. All the values were expressed relative to the control roots

Table 2

qRT-PCR analysis of predicted target genes for selected Mg-deficiency-responsive known miRNAs in C. sinensis roots

miRNAFold change of miRNAAccessionHomologyTarget genesPotential rolesRelative change of target genes
miR1589.23711361** orange1.1g022993m AT5G62740.1 SPFH/Band 7/PHB domain-containing membrane-associated protein family Stress response 0.73**
miR1222−13.23073355**orange1.1g037429mAT4G27220.1NB-ARC domain-containing disease resistance proteinDisease resistance proteinND
miR29196.01101607** orange1.1g002089m AT3G14940.1 Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase 3 Carbohydrate metabolism 0.53**
miR34373.97352136** orange1.1g040557m AT1G56140.1 Leucine-rich repeat transmembrane protein kinase Transmembrane signal transduction 0.65**
miR78214.13197145**orange1.1g010745mAT1G29760.1Putative adipose-regulatory protein (Seipin)Triacylglycerol accumulation and LD proliferation0.95
miR394−5.44692358**orange1.1g000114mAT1G20960.1U5 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein helicase, putativemRNA processing1.48
miR4143.01957377**orange1.1g004767mAT1G17980.1Poly(A) polymerase 1mRNA processing0.76
orange1.1g006232m AT1G17980.1 Poly(A) polymerase 1 mRNA processing 0.72**
miR4182.16768709**orange1.1g003146mAT1G20780.1Senescence-associated E3 ubiquitin ligase 1Ubl conjugation pathway0.78
miR61508.95879131**orange1.1g009434mAT5G62810.1Peroxin 14Protein import into peroxisome matrix, docking3.91**
orange1.1g009573mAT5G62810.1Peroxin 14Protein import into peroxisome matrix, docking2.36*
orange1.1g018459mAT3G28715.1ATPase, V0/A0 complex, subunit C/DATP hydrolysis coupled proton transport0.82
miR62788.85634619**orange1.1g005896mAT3G14470.1NB-ARC domain-containing disease resistance proteinDisease resistance protein1.63**
orange1.1g030696mAT5G17840.1DnaJ/Hsp40 cysteine-rich domain superfamily proteinStress response1.56**
miR1847−2.21361107** orange1.1g026316m AT5G35530.1 Ribosomal protein S3 family protein Translation 2.76**
orange1.1g026835m AT5G35530.1 Ribosomal protein S3 family protein Translation 1.84*
orange1.1g029201mAT2G31610.1Ribosomal protein S3 family proteinTranslation1.91
miR6028−2.29912898**orange1.1g005923mAT2G33580.1LysM-containing receptor-like kinase 5Transmembrane signal transduction0.67**
orange1.1g034040mAT5G42990.1Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 18Protein ubiquitinationND
orange1.1g021729mAT4G29100.1Basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) DNA-binding superfamily proteinTranscription factorND
orange1.1g026539mAT1G79020.1Enhancer of polycomb-like transcription factor proteinTranscription regulationND
orange1.1g045123mAT4G35800.1RNA polymerase II large subunitmRNA synthesisND
orange1.1g003175mAT4G14700.1Origin recognition complex 1DNA synthesis and replication0.57**
orange1.1g006076m AT3G46790.1 Tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR)-like superfamily protein 6.01**
orange1.1g029970m AT3G49940.1 LOB domain-containing protein 38 6.05**
orange1.1g028357m AT2G45850.2 AT-hook motif nuclear-localized protein 9 (AHL9) Transcription factor 6.12**
miR51764.58746604**orange1.1g005789mAT4G09140.1MUTL-homologue 1DNA mismatch repair3.21**
orange1.1g008397mAT4G09140.1MUTL-homologue 1DNA mismatch repair2.87**
orange1.1g010846mAT4G09140.1MUTL-homologue 1DNA mismatch repair3.13**
orange1.1g012406mAT4G09140.1MUTL-homologue 1DNA mismatch repair5.39*
miR71214.74373348** orange1.1g005267m AT1G71400.1 Receptor like protein 12 Hormone-mediated signaling pathway 0.66**
orange1.1g005542m AT1G71400.1 Receptor like protein 12 Hormone-mediated signaling pathway 0.77**
orange1.1g008628mAT1G71400.1Receptor like protein 12Hormone-mediated signaling pathway1.76**
orange1.1g002167mAT5G27060.1Receptor like protein 53Hormone-mediated signaling pathway5.01**
orange1.1g012980mAT5G53390.1O-acyltransferase (WSD1-like) family proteinLipid and fatty-acid metabolism0.86
orange1.1g013532m AT5G53390.1 O-acyltransferase (WSD1-like) family protein Lipid and fatty-acid metabolism 0.72**
orange1.1g027358m AT5G03080.1 Phosphatidic acid phosphatase (PAP2) family protein Dephosphorylation 0.53**
orange1.1g027353m AT5G03080.1 Phosphatidic acid phosphatase (PAP2) family protein Dephosphorylation 0.56**
miR6190−3.61190068** orange1.1g029300m AT5G64200.1 Ortholog of human splicing factor SC35 SR protein 2.65**
orange1.1g017284m AT5G34850.1 Purple acid phosphatase 26 Phosphate ion homeostasis 1.82**
orange1.1g002842m AT4G01810.1 Sec23/Sec24 protein transport family protein Intracellular protein transport 1.64**
miR6446−3.77151631** orange1.1g016909m AT5G09300.1 Thiamin diphosphate-binding fold (THDP-binding) superfamily protein Lipid and fatty-acid metabolism 3.23**
orange1.1g023827m AT5G09300.1 Thiamin diphosphate-binding fold (THDP-binding) superfamily protein Lipid and fatty-acid metabolism 2.56**
orange1.1g001557m AT5G20280.1 Sucrose phosphate synthase 1F C-compound and carbohydrate metabolism 3.51**
orange1.1g002665m AT5G20280.1 Sucrose phosphate synthase 1F C-compound and carbohydrate metabolism 3.93**
miR6485−4.69704327** orange1.1g001969m AT5G20730.2 Transcriptional factor B3 family protein / auxin-responsive factor AUX/IAA-related Transcription factor 1.41*
orange1.1g011274m AT3G22810.1 Plant protein of unknown function (DUF828) with plant pleckstrin homology-like region 1.68**
orange1.1g031218mAT1G07400.1HSP20-like chaperones superfamily proteinStress response0.88
orange1.1g009779mAT1G08960.1Cation exchanger 11Transport0.57**
orange1.1g029454mAT5G51160.1Ankyrin repeat family protein0.20**
orange1.1g013633m AT1G28560.1 SnRNA activating complex family protein Auxin signaling pathway 2.27**
orange1.1g017698m AT1G28560.1 SnRNA activating complex family protein Auxin signaling pathway 1.33**
orange1.1g042988mAT5G62850.1Nodulin MtN3 family proteinTransport0.59**
orange1.1g007868m AT1G72650.2 Myb family transcription factor TRFL6 Transcription factor 4.39**
orange1.1g046667mAT2G38940.1Phosphate transporter 1;4Phosphate transport0.91
orange1.1g001289m AT1G14610.1 Valyl-tRNA synthetase / valine-tRNA ligase (VALRS) Protein biosynthesis 1.75**
orange1.1g001303m AT1G14610.1 Valyl-tRNA synthetase / valine-tRNA ligase (VALRS) Protein biosynthesis 1.99**
orange1.1g001757mAT1G14610.1Valyl-tRNA synthetase / valine-tRNA ligase (VALRS)Protein biosynthesis1.11
orange1.1g024117mAT2G47920.1Kinase interacting (KIP1-like) family protein0.21**
orange1.1g036588m AT4G20140.1 Leucine-rich repeat transmembrane protein kinase Transmembrane signal transduction 4.54*
orange1.1g003591m AT5G05680.1 Nuclear pore complex protein NUP88 mRNA transport, protein transport 1.59*
miR1044−5.19771615** orange1.1g001378m AT1G10170.1 NF-X-like 1 Protein ubiquitination 2.00**
orange1.1g001376m AT1G10170.1 NF-X-like 1 Protein ubiquitination 2.61*
orange1.1g047796m AT2G38380.1 Peroxidase superfamily protein Stress response 1.97**
orange1.1g042193m AT5G03340.1 ATPase, AAA-type, CDC48 protein Cell cycle, cell division, protein transport, transport 4.02*
orange1.1g019546mAT2G40340.1Integrase-type DNA-binding superfamily proteinAbscisic acid signaling pathway0.60**
miR5198−5.36879795** orange1.1g002063m AT1G72180.1 Leucine-rich receptor-like protein kinase family protein Transmembrane signal transduction 1.84**
miR5029−5.99278869**orange1.1g012168mAT5G53450.1OBP3-responsive gene 10.03**
orange1.1g026587m AT4G31300.3 Proteasome subunit beta type-6 (PBA1) Protein ubiquitination 2.26**
orange1.1g029964m AT4G31300.3 Proteasome subunit beta type-6 (PBA1) Protein ubiquitination 2.21**
orange1.1g030788m AT4G31300.3 Proteasome subunit beta type-6 (PBA1) Protein ubiquitination 2.91**
orange1.1g014625m AT3G23510.1 Cyclopropane-fatty-acyl-phospholipid synthase Lipid and fatty-acid metabolism 2.44**
orange1.1g018123m AT3G44160.1 Outer membrane OMP85 family protein Transmembrane transport 1.43*
miR5261−6.08070339** orange1.1g018132m AT3G56930.1 DHHC-type zinc finger family protein 1.94**
orange1.1g010695m AT3G12640.1 RNA binding (RRM/RBD/RNP motifs) family protein mRNA processing 2.40**
orange1.1g011967m AT3G12640.1 RNA binding (RRM/RBD/RNP motifs) family protein mRNA processing 2.80**
orange1.1g031636m AT1G67620.1 Lojap-related protein 2.41**
orange1.1g033883m AT1G67620.1 Lojap-related protein 2.03**
orange1.1g004959m AT5G66850.1 Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase 5 Intracellular signalling 1.97*
orange1.1g043928m AT2G36110.1 Polynucleotidyl transferase, ribonuclease H-like superfamily protein 3′-5′ exonuclease activity 3.32**
orange1.1g037980m AT2G36110.1 Polynucleotidyl transferase, ribonuclease H-like superfamily protein 3′-5′ exonuclease activity 2.17**
orange1.1g004713m AT5G54260.1 DNA repair and meiosis protein (Mre11) DNA damage, DNA repair, meiosis 4.47**
orange1.1g010785m AT3G26020.2 Protein phosphatase 2A regulatory B subunit family protein Intracellular signalling 2.01*
orange1.1g000012m AT1G55860.2 Ubiquitin-protein ligase 1 (E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase UPL1) Protein ubiquitination 2.05**
orange1.1g000013m AT1G55860.2 Ubiquitin-protein ligase 1 (E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase UPL1) Protein ubiquitination 2.82**
orange1.1g029528m AT5G01520.1 RING/U-box superfamily protein Protein ubiquitination 4.05*
orange1.1g029508m AT1G22360.1 UDP-glucosyl transferase 85A2 Flavonoid biosynthetic process 1.99**
miR3438−9.31063262**orange1.1g000163mAT1G55325.2RNA polymerase II transcription mediators2.29
miR1151−10.44661802** orange1.1g018149m AT5G49610.1 F-box family protein Protein ubiquitination 1.82*
orange1.1g018125m AT5G49610.1 F-box family protein Protein ubiquitination 2.69*
orange1.1g023739m AT2G41870.1 Remorin family protein 4.00**
orange1.1g027436m AT2G41870.1 Remorin family protein 2.11**
orange1.1g023033m AT2G36690.1 2-oxoglutarate (2OG) and Fe(II)-dependent oxygenase superfamily protein Oxidoreductase 2.03*
orange1.1g026453m AT1G17020.1 Senescence-related gene 1 Oxidoreductase 2.31**
orange1.1g020233m AT2G36690.1 2-oxoglutarate (2OG) and Fe(II)-dependent oxygenase superfamily protein 3.73*
orange1.1g037473mAT5G07480.1KAR-UP oxidoreductase 1Oxidoreductase1.92
miR6219−11.91465055** orange1.1g010903m AT5G15130.1 WRKY DNA-binding protein 72 Transcription factor 1.65**
miR7708−8.18079862** orange1.1g023136m AT1G06890.1 Nodulin MtN21 /EamA-like transporter family protein 2.14**
miR780−12.80878923** orange1.1g044623m AT5G17230.2 Phytoene synthase Carotenoid biosynthesis 2.15*
orange1.1g030826mAT2G26560.1Phospholipase A 2ALipid degradationND
orange1.1g004573m AT4G27220.1 NB-ARC domain-containing disease resistance protein Disease resistance 1.58**
miR16010.33203655**orange1.1g005482mAT4G30080.1Auxin response factor 16Auxin signaling pathway4.54*
orange1.1g004896mAT2G28350.1Auxin response factor 10Auxin signaling pathway22.94**
orange1.1g005075mAT4G30080.1Auxin response factor 16Auxin signaling pathway4.01**
orange1.1g008078mAT1G77850.1Auxin response factor 17Auxin signaling pathway2.90*

The relative changes of target genes are the ratio of Mg-deficient to -sufficient roots. The value for relative change of target gene was a mean of three biological replicates with two technical replicates; Target genes that had the expected changes in mRNA levels were marked in bold; * and ** indicate a significant difference at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively. ND, not detected

Relative expression levels of selected Mg-deficiency-responsive known miRNAs in Mg-deficient and control roots revealed by qRT-PCR. Bars represent mean ± SD (n = 3). For the same miRNA, different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference at P < 0.05. All the values were expressed relative to the control roots qRT-PCR analysis of predicted target genes for selected Mg-deficiency-responsive known miRNAs in C. sinensis roots The relative changes of target genes are the ratio of Mg-deficient to -sufficient roots. The value for relative change of target gene was a mean of three biological replicates with two technical replicates; Target genes that had the expected changes in mRNA levels were marked in bold; * and ** indicate a significant difference at P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively. ND, not detected

Prediction and GO analysis of targets for Mg-deficiency-responsive miRNAs

Here, we predicted 239 and 130 target genes from the 46 known and 15 novel Mg-deficiency-responsive-miRNAs, respectively (Additional files 7 and 8). As shown in Fig. 4a, the targets for known (novel) Mg-deficiency-responsive miRNAs were associated with 12 (nine) biological processes. The most abundant three GO terms were response to stress, transport and protein process for known miRNA targets and response to stress, regulation of transcription and transport for novel miRNA targets, respectively. On the basis of the molecular function, the highest percentages of three groups for known and novel miRNA targets were nucleic acid binding, other activity and kinase activity, and other activity, metal ion binding and transporter activity, respectively (Fig. 4b). As shown in Fig. 4c, the targets for known (novel) Mg-deficiency-responsive miRNAs were related to 12 (eight) cellular components. The most abundant component for known and novel miRNAs was nucleus.
Fig. 4

GO categories of the predicted target genes for 46 (15) Mg-deficiency-responsive known (novel) miRNAs in Citrus sinensis roots. MiRNAs target genes were grouped based on biological process (a), molecular function (b) and cellular component (c)

GO categories of the predicted target genes for 46 (15) Mg-deficiency-responsive known (novel) miRNAs in Citrus sinensis roots. MiRNAs target genes were grouped based on biological process (a), molecular function (b) and cellular component (c)

Validation of target genes by qRT-PCR

As shown in Table 2, 105 targets for 11 up- and 16 down-regulated miRNAs were validated by qRT-PCR. As expected, we found that 65 (61.9%) targets and their corresponding miRNAs displayed opposite trends in expression profiles in Mg-deprived roots, suggesting that miRNAs might play a role in gene regulation by cleaving mRNAs. However, 34 (32.4%) targets displayed the same expression profiles with their corresponding miRNAs in Mg-deficient roots or were not significantly affected by Mg-deficiency. The remaining 6 (0.06%) targets were not detected in roots. It is worth mentioning that 4 target genes (i.e., range1.1g005482m, orange1.1g004896m, orange1.1g005075m and orange1.1g008078m) belonging to auxin responsive factor (ARF) family have been validated by us in C. sinensis [42], suggesting that the target prediction was accurate.

Discussion

Little is known about the possible roles of miRNAs in plant Mg homeostasis [36, 43]. Here, we first investigated the Mg-deficiency-induced alterations of miRNA profiles in Citrus roots and obtained 101 up- and 69 down-regulated miRNAs (Additional files 3 and 6), demonstrating that miRNAs might be involved in Mg-deficiency responses. We obtained similar amount of miRNAs (71 miRNAs) with decreased expression, but less amount of miRNAs (75 miRNAs) with increased expression from Mg-deficient C. sinensis leaves compared with Mg-deficient C. sinensis roots [36]. Moreover, most of these miRNAs were isolated only from Mg-deprived roots or leaves, only 30 Mg-deficiency-responsive miRNAs were shared by the two. Among the 30 overlapping miRNAs, only 15 miRNAs displayed similar expression trends in Mg-deprived roots and leaves (Table 3). Thus, great differences existed in Mg-deficiency-induced alterations of miRNA profiles between roots and leaves. This agrees with our report that the physiological and biochemical responses to long-term Mg-deficiency greatly differed between C. sinensis roots and leaves [7].
Table 3

List of Mg-deficiency-responsive known miRNAs shared by both C. sinensis roots and leaves

MiRNAFold change
LeavesRoots
miR6108−10.67424131**13.767751**
miR185112.01270484**11.47852696**
miR91711.96734516**11.42532082**
miR5525−10.87750643**10.81431809**
miR158−6.05735341**9.23711361**
miR107711.84568538**8.75152564**
miR779−8.10749886**8.40390779**
miR11686.26630003**7.67556689**
miR773012.71420043**7.66997733**
miR15124.98806257**7.2149053**
miR14405.4977661**6.69472111**
miR5782−10.28908522**5.9080234**
miR35204.1203203**5.61646655**
miR5830−4.18762998**5.11294928**
miR39510.30345436**4.61153607**
miR5210−3.03780053**4.38945452**
miR3437−4.38720917**3.97352136**
miR53044.5270768**3.11469877**
miR74852.08344945**1.63183983**
miR5818−4.95063483**1.50697816**
miR1222−2.88894979**−13.23073355**
miR6425−5.81634371**−10.19869057**
miR34387.67399457**−9.31063262**
miR7708−10.0710064**−8.18079862**
miR52904.73213099**−7.59506455**
miR6247−9.56671537**−6.67041637**
miR26166.25578869**−4.06995485**
miR52866.7663942**−3.78538232**
miR64264.30631516**−1.65860955**
miR8127.83035956**−1.64980601**

Data from Additional file 3 and Ma et al. [36]; **indicates a significant difference at P < 0.01

List of Mg-deficiency-responsive known miRNAs shared by both C. sinensis roots and leaves Data from Additional file 3 and Ma et al. [36]; **indicates a significant difference at P < 0.01 We observed that miR158 was induced in Mg-deprived roots (Table 2). Similar results have been obtained on Mg-deficient C. sinensis leaves [36], P-deficient tomato roots and leaves [22], and B-starved C. sinensis roots and leaves [17, 18]. As expected, its target gene SPFH (stomatins, prohibitins, flotillins and HflK/C)/Band 7/PHB domain-containing membrane-associated protein family (AT5G62740) was repressed in Mg-deprived roots. Wang et al. [44] found that Arabidopsis phb3–3 mutants were less sensitive to salt-stress-induced inhibition of primary root growth. Thus, the down-regulation of AT5G62740 might contribute to Citrus Mg-deficiency tolerance via alleviating Mg-deficiency-induced inhibition of root growth (Fig. 1a). Gehl et al. [45] observed that the basal tissue respiration rate in stomatin-like protein 1 (slp1) knockout Arabidopsis roots was reduced by 30% compared with wild-type. In addition, miR2919 expression was induced and its target: phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase 3 (PEPC3) was inhibited in Mg-deprived C. sinensis roots (Table 2). Therefore, root respiration might be decreased in Mg-starved C. sinensis roots. This agrees with our reports that the abundances of pyruvate decarboxylase (gi|255,579,310) and phosphoglycerate kinase (gi|332,195,235) in glycolysis and the activities of key enzymes in glycolysis and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle were reduced in Mg-deprived C. sinensis roots accompanied by decreased accumulation of carbohydrates and lower respiration [7, 12]. Both root miR6278 and its targets: NB-ARC domain-containing disease resistance protein involved in disease resistance and DnaJ/Hsp40 cysteine-rich domain superfamily protein (AT3G14470.1) were induced by Mg-deficiency. In addition, NB-ARC domain-containing disease resistance protein (AT4G27220.1) targeted by miR780 was induced in Mg-depprived roots (Table 2). Similarly, the abundances of Grp94 (HSP; gi|23,477,636) and disease resistance protein (gi|227,438,123) was increased in Mg-starved C. sinensis roots [12]. Thus, disease resistance might be elevated in these roots with increased levels of Ca and K [46], which contribute to plant disease resistance [47, 48]. MiR414 mainly targets transcriptional regulators including MYB, bZIP family transcription factors, WRKY and scarecrow and might have key roles in plant growth and development [49]. As expected, miR414 was up-regulated and its target gene: poly(A) polymerase 1 was inhibited in Mg-deprived roots (Table 2). This was also supported by our reports that the abundances of transcription factor homolog BTF3-like protein (gi|33,945,882), spliceosome RNA helicase BAT1 (gi|226,528,292) and RNA polymerase β chain (gi|90,403,817) were lowered in Mg-deficient C. sinensis roots [12]. We found that miR1847 was inhibited in Mg-deprived roots (Table 2). This agrees with the results obtained on B-deficient roots [17] and disagrees with the data obtained on B-deficient leaves [18]. As expected, its target genes: ribosomal protein S3 family proteins were up-regulated in these roots. In addition, VALRS targeted by miR6485 were induced or was little affected in Mg-starved roots (Table 2). Thus, protein biosynthesis might not be lowered in Mg-starved roots, as shown by unchanged concentration of total soluble proteins in Mg-deprived C. sinensis roots [7, 12]. Also, the reduced dilution due to the decrease in root DW (Fig. 1a) might account for the unchanged protein level. MiR5176 was induced in Mg-deprived roots (Table 2), as found on B-starved C. sinensis roots [17]. DNA mismatch repair (MMR) system is required for the correction of DNA biosynthetic errors [50]. MUTL-homologue 1 (MLH1) participates in DNA MMR, correcting DNA damage and insertion-deletion loops arising from DNA replication [51]. MLH1 targeted by miR5176 were induced rather than inhibited in Mg-deprived roots (Table 2). Thus, MMR system might be up-regulated in these roots, thus enhancing Citrus Mg-deficiency tolerance via correcting DNA biosynthetic errors. Similarly, DNA repair and meiosis protein (Mre11) targeted by miR5261 was induced in Mg-deprived roots (Table 2). Plant leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase proteins play crucial roles in abiotic stresses [52]. MiR5198 and its target gene: leucine-rich receptor-like protein kinase (LR-RLK) family protein were repressed and induced in Mg-starved roots, respectively (Table 2). Similarly, leucine-rich repeat receptor-like protein kinase (ACN59310.1) was up-regulated in Mg-starved C. reticulata roots [13]. Thus, miR5198 might be involved in Citrus Mg-deficiency responses. Root miR780 was repressed by Mg-deficiency (Table 2), as found on B-starved C. sinensis roots [17]. As expected, its targets: NB-ARC domain-containing disease resistance protein and phytoene synthase (PSY) were up-regulated in Mg-starved roots (Table 2). Various transgenic plants over-expressing bacterial or plant gene encoding PSY, a major rate-limiting carotenoid (Car) enzyme, displayed increased Car level [53, 54]. Therefore, Car biosynthesis might be enhanced in Mg-starved C. sinensis roots, thus increasing their antioxidant ability. We observed that miR7121 and its target gene: phosphatidic acid phosphatase (PAP2) family protein was up- and down-regulated in Mg-starved roots, respectively (Table 2). Nakano et al. [55] demonstrated that the inhibition of PAP2 expression or function conferred resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum via rapidly triggering plant defenses in Nicotiana benthamiana. Thus, the down-regulation of PAP2 family protein might contribute to plant disease-resistance. As shown in Table 2, miR6190 was down-regulated and its target genes [i.e., purple acid phosphatase 26 (PPAP26), Sec23/Sec24 protein transport family protein and ortholog of human splicing factor SC35, also known as serine/arginine-rich (SR) splicing factor SC35] were up-regulated in Mg-deficient roots. SR proteins are required for regulating alternative splicing. In higher plants, great alterations in alternative splicing due to various abiotic stresses demonstrate the roles of SR proteins in the adaptation to environmental stress [56]. Induction of acid phosphatases (APases) by P-starvation is a well-documented mechanism of plant P-deficiency tolerance. Hurley et al. [57] demonstrated that AtPPAP26 was the major contributor to P-deficiency-inducible APase activity. In addition, AtPPAP26 also showed alkaline peroxidase (POD) activity. Mg-deficiency-induced up-regulation of root PPAP26 (Table 2) agrees with the report that AtPPAP26 was induced in P-deficient Arabidopsis roots, shoots and suspension cells [58] because C. sinensis leaf, stem and root P levels were reduced by Mg-deficiency [46]. Coat protein complex II (COPII) vesicles play an essential role for the export of secretory cargo from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) to the Golgi complex in all eukaryotes [59]. Mg-deficiency-induced up-regulation of root gene encoding Sec23/Sec24 protein transport family protein (Table 2), a subset of the COPII components, agrees with our report that the abundance of Sec23/Sec24 protein transport family protein was elevated in B-deficient roots [60]. In Arabidopsis, miRNA160 negatively regulates the repressor auxin response factor (ARF) family: ARF17 [61], ARF16 [62] and ARF10 [63]. The repression of these genes by miR160 is required for seed germination and the normal development of roots, stems and leaves. Li et al. [64] demonstrated that soybean miR160a negatively regulated the progress of leaf senescence via repressing its targets: ARF10, ARF16 and ARF17. We found that miR160 was induced in Mg-deficient roots (Table 2), as obtained on P-starved Lupinus albus roots [65] and N-deficient maize roots [66]. Therefore, the induction of root miR160 by Mg-deprivation might be an adaptive response. Unexpectedly, its targets: ARF10, ARF16 and ARF17 were up-regulated in Mg-deprived C. sinensis roots (Table 2). Endogenous target mimics (eTMs) can impede the interaction between miRNAs and their authentic targets via binding to miRNAs [67, 68]. Lin et al. [69] demonstrated that eTMs repressed miR160-mediated cleavage of ARF10, ARF16 and ARF17 during longan somatic embryogenesis. No negative correlations were observed among the levels of miR160 and ARF10, ARF16 and ARF17 transcripts in longan vegetative and generative tissues. Thus, the correlations between miR160 and its targets in C. sinensis roots can be explained in this way. Root miR6485 was repressed and its several target genes were up-regulated by Mg-deprivation (Table 2). Li et al. [70] reported that ARF7 (AT5G20730) is necessary for both auxin signaling and ethylene responses in Arabidopsis roots. Okushima et al. [71] observed that lateral root formation was badly damaged in Arabidopsis arf7 arf19 double knockout mutant, concluding that ARFs directly activated LATERAL ORGAN BOUNDARIES DOMAIN/ASYMMETRIC LEAVES2-LIKE (LBD/ASL) genes, thus regulating lateral root formation. Thus, the induction of root transcriptional factor B3 family protein/auxin-responsive factor AUX/IAA-related by Mg-deficiency might play a part in Mg-deficiency tolerance via maintaining lateral root formation. Similarly, SnRNA activating complex family protein (SDR2), which is associated with auxin-activated signaling pathway, was induced in Mg-deprived roots (Table 2). Ohtani et al. [72] reported that srd2 mutation repressed the expression of PIN-FORMED proteins, which might account for the failure to generate an auxin gradient, thus leading to different abnormalities in root morphogenesis in Arabidopsis mutant. Nuclear pore complex protein NUP88 is necessary for systemic acquired resistance and R protein-mediated defense [73]. The induction of root NUP88 by Mg-deficiency (Table 2) agrees with the above inference that that disease-resistance was improved in Mg-deficient roots. Root miR1044 was repressed and its target genes [i.e., NF-X-like 1 (NFXL1), POD superfamily protein and ATPase, AAA-type, CDC48 protein] were induced by Mg-deprivation except for integrase-type DNA-binding superfamily protein (Table 2). Lisso et al. [74] observed that AtNFXL1 was induced in roots under salt and osmotic stress, and that both AtNFXL1-antisense plants and atnfxl1–1 knock-out mutants had lower growth and survival rates than wild-type plants when exposed to salt or osmotic stress. CDC48, a member of AAA-ATPase family proteins that provides energy for plant development via regulating ATPase, is required for plant cell division, expansion and differentiation [75]. Wang et al. [76] suggested that the induction of PpCDC48II by low temperature played a key role in cold-induced freezing tolerance of Physcomitrella patens cells. MiR5261 and its target genes were repressed and induced in Mg-starved roots, respectively (Table 2). The induction of root RNA binding (RRM/RBD/RNP motifs) family protein by Mg-deficiency agrees with our report that the abundance of RNA binding (RRM/RBD/RNP motifs) family protein was elevated in B-deficient roots [60]. A typical mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade is composed of three sequentially activated protein kinases, namely MAPK, MAPK kinase (MAPKK) and MAPKK kinase (MAPKKK). Stress-tolerance of some plants such as Arabidopsis, tobacco and cereals has been enhanced by genetically altering the abundances and/or the activities of some MAPK components [77, 78]. The induction of root protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) regulatory B subunit family protein by Mg-deficiency (Table 2) agrees with the report that wheat root PP2AbB"-α was up-regulated when exposed to various abiotic stresses. Transgenic wheat lines over-expressing TaPP2AbB"-α displayed better lateral root development, especially under NaCl and mannitol stresses [79]. Ubiquitination-proteasomal pathway has been shown to function in plant senescence and in stress response by facilitating the degradation of bulk proteins for N recycling [80]. Transgenic tobacco lines over-expressing a maize gene encoding E3 ubiquitin ligase (UPL) displayed increased drought tolerance accompanied by higher activities of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase, more accumulation of proline and less accumulation of malondialdehyde (MDA) and ROS when exposed to drought stress [81]. Over-expression of TaFBA1 encoding F-box protein conferred drought and oxidative stress tolerance in tobacco plants via up-regulating the activities of SOD, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase (APX) and POD, and lowering the levels of ROS and MDA [82, 83]. Thus, up-regulation of UPL1 and RING/U-box superfamily protein targeted by miR5261, NFXL1 targeted by miR1044, F-box family protein targeted by miR1151 and proteasome subunit beta type-6 (PBA1) targeted by miR5029 in Mg-starved roots (Table 2) might confer stress-tolerance, thus contributing to Mg-deficiency tolerance in Citrus plants. Similarly, the expression levels of UPL5 (XP 003594229.1) and F-box family protein (XP 003612153.1) in C. reticulata roots [13] and the abundances of putative proteasome subunit alpha type (gi|255,584,432) in C. sinensis roots [12] were elevated by Mg-deficiency.

Conclusions

For the first time, we used Illumina sequencing to identify 71 known and 30 novel miRNAs with increased expressed, and 54 known and 15 novel miRNAs with decreased expression in Mg-deficient C. sinensis roots, demonstrating that miRNAs might be involved in Citrus Mg-deficiency tolerance. Through integrating our findings with the previous data, we put forward a potential scheme for the responses of miRNAs to Mg-deficiency in Citrus roots (Fig. 5). Here, we obtained several novel Mg-deficiency-responsive miRNAs (i.e., miR5261, miR158, miR6190, miR6485, miR1151 and miR1044) possibly responsible for Citrus Mg-deficiency tolerance. Our findings results not only increased our knowledge on the functions of plant miRNAs under nutrient deficiencies, but also established foundation to improve Mg-deficiency tolerance via manipulating the actions of miRNAs.
Fig. 5

A potential scheme for responses of C. sinensis roots miRNAs to Mg-deficiency. LRRTPK: Leucine-rich repeat transmembrane protein kinase; LYK5: LysM-containing receptor-like kinase 5; PEX14: Peroxin 14; RBFP: RNA binding (RRM/RBD/RNP motifs) family protein; RLP: Receptor like protein; RPS3: Ribosomal protein S3 family protein; WRKY72: WRKY DNA-binding protein 72

A potential scheme for responses of C. sinensis roots miRNAs to Mg-deficiency. LRRTPK: Leucine-rich repeat transmembrane protein kinase; LYK5: LysM-containing receptor-like kinase 5; PEX14: Peroxin 14; RBFP: RNA binding (RRM/RBD/RNP motifs) family protein; RLP: Receptor like protein; RPS3: Ribosomal protein S3 family protein; WRKY72: WRKY DNA-binding protein 72

Methods

Citrus sinensis Seedling culture and long-term Mg-deficient treatments

Seedling culture and long-term Mg-deficient treatments were carried out as described previously [12]. In short, 15-week-old ‘Xuegan’ [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] seedlings, which were grown in 6 L pots (two seedlings per pot) filled with clean river sand in a greenhouse under natural photoperiod at Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, were supplied every other day until dripping with nutrient solution at a Mg concentration of 0 mM (Mg-deficiency) or 1 mM (Mg-sufficiency, control) from MgSO4. S at the nutrient solution was kept at a constant level by adding equivalent moles of Na2SO4 in replace of MgSO4. After 16 weeks, ~ 5-mm-long root apices from new white fibrous roots were harvested and immediately frozen in liquid N2, then stored at −80 °C until extraction. The seedlings not being sampled were used for the measurements of root DW, leaf and root Mg.

Root DW and root and leaf Mg

For each treatment, roots from nine seedlings (one seedling per pot) were taken. Root DW was measured after being dried at 70 °C to a constant weight (~ 48 h). Fibrous roots and ~7-week-old leaves (midribs and petioles removed) were harvested and then dried at 70 °C to a constant weight. Dried roots and leaves were ground to pass a 40 mesh sieve, finally digested with 1 N HCl [84]. Mg concentration in the solution was measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy.

Root sRNAs library construction, high-throughput sequencing, annotation and miRNA identification

Equal amounts of frozen root apices from five seedlings (one seedling per pot) were pooled as a biological replicate. There was one biological replicate for each treatment. Approximately 0.1 g mixed frozen Mg-deficient or control root apices were used to extract total RNA with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Construction of sRNA libraries was performed as described by Lu et al. [17]. Illumina sequencing was carried out with a Solexa sequencer at the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI), Shenzhen, China. Both sRNA annotation and miRNA identification were made as described previously [17, 18]. After raw data being analyzed with a software developed by BGI, clean reads were then utilized to assay length distribution. Finally, the clear reads were mapped to C. sinensis genome (JGIversion 1.1, http://phytozome.jgi.doe.gov/pz/portal.html#!info?alias=Org_Csinensis) using SOAP, only perfectly mapped sequences were retained and analyzed further. rRNAs, tRNAs, snRNAs and snoRNAs were removed from the sRNAs sequences through BLASTn search using NCBI Genebank database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi/) and Rfam (12.0) database (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/databases/rfam.html) (e = 0.01). The remaining sequences were aligned with known plant miRNAs from miRBase 21 (http://www.mirbase.org/). Only the perfectly matched sequences were considered to be conserved miRNAs. Reads not being annotated were used for the prediction of novel miRNAs using Mireap (http://sourceforge.net/projects/mireap/), a software developed by BGI. Also, both DNAMAN 8 (http://www.lynnon.com/pc/framepc.html) and MTide (http://bis.zju.edu.cn/MTide) [85] were used for the prediction of novel miRNAs. Only these miRNA candidates being simultaneously predicted by the three softwares were regarded to be novel miRNAs.

Differentially expressed miRNAs and target prediction

Both the fold change between Mg-deficient and -sufficient roots and the P-value were calculated from the normalized expression of TPM [86]. A miRNA was regarded to be differentially expressed when it had both a P-value <0.01 and a log2-fold change >1.5 [17]. Target prediction of miRNAs was carried out by RNAhybrid according to the rules proposed by Schwab et al. [87] and Allen et al. [88].

Categories of the potential targets predicted from Mg-deficiency-responsive miRNAs

All target genes predicted from Mg-deficiency-responsive miRNAs were mapped to GO terms in the database (http://www.geneontology.org/), and gene numbers for each term was calculated. All these targets were grouped into three categories: biological process, molecular function, cellular component [17].

Validation of Mg-deficiency-responsive miRNAs by stem-loop qRT-PCR and of target genes by qRT-PCR

Stem-loop qRT-PCR analysis of miRNAs was carried out as described previously [18]. Stem-loop primers for reverse transcription and primers for qRT-PCR were summarized in Additional file 9. qRT-PCR analysis of target genes was carried out with an ABI 7500 Real Time System as described by Lu et al. [17]. The sequences of the F and R primers used were given in Additional file 10. Equal amounts of frozen root apices from five seedlings (one seedling per pot) were pooled as a biological replicate. For each treatment, there were three biological replicates and two technical replicates. Relative miRNA expression was calculated using ddCt algorithm. Actin (AEK97331.1) was used as an internal standard and the roots from Mg-sufficient seedlings were used as reference sample, which was set to 1.

Experimental design and data analysis

For each treatment, there were 20 pot seedlings in a completely randomized design. Experiments were carried out with 3 replicates except for high-throughput sequencing (n = 1), root and leaf Mg (n = 5), and root DW (n = 9). Unpaired t-test was performed for the significant test between two means (Mg-sufficiency and -deficiency). List of known miRNAs in C. sinensis roots. (DOC 995 kb) List of known miRNAs in C. sinensis roots after removing these miRNAs with normalized read-count less than 10 TPM in the two miRNA libraries constructed from Mg-sufficient and -deficient roots. (DOC 447 kb) List of Mg-deficiency-responsive known miRNAs in C. sinensis roots. (DOC 205 kb) List of novel miRNAs in C. sinensis roots. (DOC 288 kb) List of novel miRNAs in C. sinensis roots after removing these miRNAs with normalized read-count less than 10 TPM in the two miRNA libraries constructed from Mg-sufficient and -deficient roots. (DOC 160 kb) List of Mg-deficiency-responsive novel miRNAs in C. sinensis roots. (DOC 105 kb) List of target genes for parts of known miRNAs in C. sinensis roots. (DOC 262 kb) List of target genes for parts of novel miRNAs in C. sinensis roots. (DOCX 25 kb) Stem loop primer sequences for qRT-PCR analysis of miRNAs. (DOCX 17 kb) Specific primer pairs used for qRT-PCR expression analysis of selected miRNA target genes. (DOCX 31 kb)
  73 in total

1.  Expression pattern suggests a role of MiR399 in the regulation of the cellular response to local Pi increase during arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis.

Authors:  Anja Branscheid; Daniela Sieh; Bikram Datt Pant; Patrick May; Emanuel A Devers; Anders Elkrog; Leif Schauser; Wolf-Rüdiger Scheible; Franziska Krajinski
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 2.  Role of miRNAs and siRNAs in biotic and abiotic stress responses of plants.

Authors:  Basel Khraiwesh; Jian-Kang Zhu; Jianhua Zhu
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2011-05-13

Review 3.  Improvement of stress tolerance in plants by genetic manipulation of mitogen-activated protein kinases.

Authors:  Olga Šamajová; Ondřej Plíhal; Mohamed Al-Yousif; Heribert Hirt; Jozef Šamaj
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 14.227

4.  Particular significance of SRD2-dependent snRNA accumulation in polarized pattern generation during lateral root development of Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Misato Ohtani; Taku Demura; Munetaka Sugiyama
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 4.927

5.  Target deletion of the AAA ATPase PpCDC48II in Physcomitrella patens results in freezing sensitivity after cold acclimation.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Shuo Jin; Xi Chen; Xuke Gen; Yikun He
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 6.038

6.  A role for auxin response factor 19 in auxin and ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Jisheng Li; Xinhua Dai; Yunde Zhao
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-02-03       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 7.  Role of magnesium in carbon partitioning and alleviating photooxidative damage.

Authors:  Ismail Cakmak; Ernest A Kirkby
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.500

Review 8.  NPK macronutrients and microRNA homeostasis.

Authors:  Franceli R Kulcheski; Régis Côrrea; Igor A Gomes; Júlio C de Lima; Rogerio Margis
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Proteomic analysis of Citrus sinensis roots and leaves in response to long-term magnesium-deficiency.

Authors:  Hao-Yang Peng; Yi-Ping Qi; Jinwook Lee; Lin-Tong Yang; Peng Guo; Huan-Xin Jiang; Li-Song Chen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 10.  Role of microRNAs involved in plant response to nitrogen and phosphorous limiting conditions.

Authors:  Giao N Nguyen; Steven J Rothstein; German Spangenberg; Surya Kant
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 5.753

View more
  11 in total

1.  MicroRNAs in durum wheat seedlings under chronic and short-term nitrogen stress.

Authors:  Diana L Zuluaga; Vittoria Liuzzi; Pasquale Luca Curci; Gabriella Sonnante
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.410

2.  The different tolerance to magnesium deficiency of two grapevine rootstocks relies on the ability to cope with oxidative stress.

Authors:  Sonia Livigni; Luigi Lucini; Davide Sega; Oriano Navacchi; Tiziana Pandolfini; Anita Zamboni; Zeno Varanini
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 5.260

Review 3.  Redox Balance-DDR-miRNA Triangle: Relevance in Genome Stability and Stress Responses in Plants.

Authors:  Sara Cimini; Carla Gualtieri; Anca Macovei; Alma Balestrazzi; Laura De Gara; Vittoria Locato
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 5.753

4.  A Bioinformatics Approach to Explore MicroRNAs as Tools to Bridge Pathways Between Plants and Animals. Is DNA Damage Response (DDR) a Potential Target Process?

Authors:  Massimo Bellato; Davide De Marchi; Carla Gualtieri; Elisabetta Sauta; Paolo Magni; Anca Macovei; Lorenzo Pasotti
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 5.  Noncoding-RNA-Mediated Regulation in Response to Macronutrient Stress in Plants.

Authors:  Ziwei Li; Peng Tian; Tengbo Huang; Jianzi Huang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 6.  MicroRNA Mediated Plant Responses to Nutrient Stress.

Authors:  Waqar Islam; Arfa Tauqeer; Abdul Waheed; Fanjiang Zeng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Genome-Wide Association Study Reveals Novel Genomic Regions Associated with 10 Grain Minerals in Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat.

Authors:  Madhav Bhatta; P Stephen Baenziger; Brian M Waters; Rachana Poudel; Vikas Belamkar; Jesse Poland; Alexey Morgounov
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Comparative Metabolomics Unravel the Effect of Magnesium Oversupply on Tomato Fruit Quality and Associated Plant Metabolism.

Authors:  Min Cheol Kwon; Yangmin X Kim; Seulbi Lee; Eun Sung Jung; Digar Singh; Jwakyung Sung; Choong Hwan Lee
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2019-10-16

9.  Differences in morphological and physiological features of citrus seedlings are related to Mg transport from the parent to branch organs.

Authors:  Yamin Jia; Hao Xu; Yuwen Wang; Xin Ye; Ningwei Lai; Zengrong Huang; Lintong Yang; Yan Li; Li-Song Chen; Jiuxin Guo
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.215

10.  Integrated Analysis of miRNAs Associated With Sugarcane Responses to Low-Potassium Stress.

Authors:  Nannan Zhang; Xiaomin Feng; Qiaoying Zeng; Huanzhang Lin; Zilin Wu; Xiaoning Gao; Yonghong Huang; Jiayun Wu; Yongwen Qi
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.