Shari L Wade1, Megan E Narad1, Kathleen M Kingery2, H Gerry Taylor3, Terry Stancin4, Michael W Kirkwood5, Keith O Yeates6. 1. Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center. 2. Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati. 3. Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics and Psychology, Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University. 4. Division of Pediatric Psychology, Department of Pediatrics, Metro-Health Medical Center. 5. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Children's Hospital Colorado. 6. Department of Psychology, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute.
Abstract
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVE: To describe the Teen Online Problem Solving-Teen Only (TOPS-TO) intervention relative to the original Teen Online Problem Solving-Family (TOPS-F) intervention, to describe a randomized controlled trial to assess intervention efficacy, and to report feasibility and acceptability of the TOPS-TO intervention. Research method and design: This is a multisite randomized controlled trial, including 152 teens (49 TOPS-F, 51 TOPS-TO, 52 IRC) between the ages of 11-18 who were hospitalized for a moderate to severe traumatic brain injury in the previous 18 months. Assessments were completed at baseline, 6-months post baseline, and 12-months post baseline. Data discussed include adherence and satisfaction data collected at the 6-month assessment (treatment completion) for TOPS-F and TOPS-TO. RESULTS:Adherence measures (sessions completed, dropout rates, duration of treatment engagement, and rates of program completion) were similar across treatment groups. Overall, teen and parent reported satisfaction was high and similar across groups. Teens spent a similar amount of time on the TOPS website across groups, and parents in the TOPS-F spent more time on the TOPS website than those in the TOPS-TO group (p = .002). Parents in the TOPS-F group rated the TOPS website as more helpful than those in the TOPS-TO group (p = .05). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: TOPS-TO intervention is a feasible and acceptable intervention approach. Parents may perceive greater benefit from the family based intervention. Further examination is required to understand the comparative efficacy in improving child and family outcomes, and who is likely to benefit from each approach. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVE: To describe the Teen Online Problem Solving-Teen Only (TOPS-TO) intervention relative to the original Teen Online Problem Solving-Family (TOPS-F) intervention, to describe a randomized controlled trial to assess intervention efficacy, and to report feasibility and acceptability of the TOPS-TO intervention. Research method and design: This is a multisite randomized controlled trial, including 152 teens (49 TOPS-F, 51 TOPS-TO, 52 IRC) between the ages of 11-18 who were hospitalized for a moderate to severe traumatic brain injury in the previous 18 months. Assessments were completed at baseline, 6-months post baseline, and 12-months post baseline. Data discussed include adherence and satisfaction data collected at the 6-month assessment (treatment completion) for TOPS-F and TOPS-TO. RESULTS: Adherence measures (sessions completed, dropout rates, duration of treatment engagement, and rates of program completion) were similar across treatment groups. Overall, teen and parent reported satisfaction was high and similar across groups. Teens spent a similar amount of time on the TOPS website across groups, and parents in the TOPS-F spent more time on the TOPS website than those in the TOPS-TO group (p = .002). Parents in the TOPS-F group rated the TOPS website as more helpful than those in the TOPS-TO group (p = .05). CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: TOPS-TO intervention is a feasible and acceptable intervention approach. Parents may perceive greater benefit from the family based intervention. Further examination is required to understand the comparative efficacy in improving child and family outcomes, and who is likely to benefit from each approach. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).
Authors: Jeffrey E Max; Russell J Schachar; Harvey S Levin; Linda Ewing-Cobbs; Sandra B Chapman; Maureen Dennis; Ann Saunders; Julie Landis Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Tatjana Novakovic-Agopian; Anthony J-W Chen; Scott Rome; Gary Abrams; Holli Castelli; Annemarie Rossi; Ryan McKim; Nancy Hills; Mark D'Esposito Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2011 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Brad G Kurowski; Shari L Wade; Michael W Kirkwood; Tanya M Brown; Terry Stancin; H Gerry Taylor Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-06-10 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Avani C Modi; Constance A Mara; Matthew Schmidt; Aimee W Smith; Luke Turnier; Noah Glaser; Shari L Wade Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2019-08-19 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Shari L Wade; Megan E Narad; Emily L Shultz; Brad G Kurowski; Aimee E Miley; Jessica M Aguilar; Anna-Lynne R Adlam Journal: J Neurosurg Sci Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Ann Lantagne; Robin L Peterson; Michael W Kirkwood; H Gerry Taylor; Terry Stancin; Keith Owen Yeates; Shari L Wade Journal: J Pediatr Psychol Date: 2018-08-01
Authors: Shari L Wade; Kelly M Jones; Claudia Corti; Anna R Adlam; Jennifer Limond; Alessandra Bardoni; Lisa M Gies Journal: Rehabil Psychol Date: 2021-11
Authors: Brad G Kurowski; H Gerry Taylor; Kelly A McNally; Michael W Kirkwood; Amy Cassedy; Paul S Horn; Terry Stancin; Shari L Wade Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2020 May/Jun Impact factor: 3.117