Literature DB >> 28835472

Dissecting Causal Pathways Using Mendelian Randomization with Summarized Genetic Data: Application to Age at Menarche and Risk of Breast Cancer.

Stephen Burgess1,2, Deborah J Thompson3, Jessica M B Rees2, Felix R Day4, John R Perry4, Ken K Ong4.   

Abstract

Mendelian randomization is the use of genetic variants as instrumental variables to estimate causal effects of risk factors on outcomes. The total causal effect of a risk factor is the change in the outcome resulting from intervening on the risk factor. This total causal effect may potentially encompass multiple mediating mechanisms. For a proposed mediator, the direct effect of the risk factor is the change in the outcome resulting from a change in the risk factor, keeping the mediator constant. A difference between the total effect and the direct effect indicates that the causal pathway from the risk factor to the outcome acts at least in part via the mediator (an indirect effect). Here, we show that Mendelian randomization estimates of total and direct effects can be obtained using summarized data on genetic associations with the risk factor, mediator, and outcome, potentially from different data sources. We perform simulations to test the validity of this approach when there is unmeasured confounding and/or bidirectional effects between the risk factor and mediator. We illustrate this method using the relationship between age at menarche and risk of breast cancer, with body mass index (BMI) as a potential mediator. We show an inverse direct causal effect of age at menarche on risk of breast cancer (independent of BMI), and a positive indirect effect via BMI. In conclusion, multivariable Mendelian randomization using summarized genetic data provides a rapid and accessible analytic strategy that can be undertaken using publicly available data to better understand causal mechanisms.
Copyright © 2017 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mendelian randomization; causal inference; direct effect; instrumental variable; mediation analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28835472      PMCID: PMC5629317          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.117.300191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  27 in total

1.  An introduction to instrumental variables for epidemiologists.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 2.  Avoiding bias from weak instruments in Mendelian randomization studies.

Authors:  Stephen Burgess; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-03-16       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 3.  Use of Mendelian randomisation to assess potential benefit of clinical intervention.

Authors:  Stephen Burgess; Adam Butterworth; Anders Malarstig; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-11-06

4.  Re: "Multivariable Mendelian randomization: the use of pleiotropic genetic variants to estimate causal effects".

Authors:  Stephen Burgess; Frank Dudbridge; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Identification of genomic loci associated with resting heart rate and shared genetic predictors with all-cause mortality.

Authors:  Ruben N Eppinga; Yanick Hagemeijer; Stephen Burgess; David A Hinds; Kari Stefansson; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Patricia B Munroe; Niek Verweij; Pim van der Harst
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 38.330

6.  Using published data in Mendelian randomization: a blueprint for efficient identification of causal risk factors.

Authors:  Stephen Burgess; Robert A Scott; Nicholas J Timpson; George Davey Smith; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 8.082

7.  Network Mendelian randomization: using genetic variants as instrumental variables to investigate mediation in causal pathways.

Authors:  Stephen Burgess; Rhian M Daniel; Adam S Butterworth; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: the design, analysis, and interpretation of Mendelian randomization studies.

Authors:  Philip C Haycock; Stephen Burgess; Kaitlin H Wade; Jack Bowden; Caroline Relton; George Davey Smith
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  Genetically Predicted Body Mass Index and Breast Cancer Risk: Mendelian Randomization Analyses of Data from 145,000 Women of European Descent.

Authors:  Yan Guo; Shaneda Warren Andersen; Xiao-Ou Shu; Kyriaki Michailidou; Manjeet K Bolla; Qin Wang; Montserrat Garcia-Closas; Roger L Milne; Marjanka K Schmidt; Jenny Chang-Claude; Allison Dunning; Stig E Bojesen; Habibul Ahsan; Kristiina Aittomäki; Irene L Andrulis; Hoda Anton-Culver; Volker Arndt; Matthias W Beckmann; Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel; Javier Benitez; Natalia V Bogdanova; Bernardo Bonanni; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Judith Brand; Hiltrud Brauch; Hermann Brenner; Thomas Brüning; Barbara Burwinkel; Graham Casey; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Fergus J Couch; Angela Cox; Simon S Cross; Kamila Czene; Peter Devilee; Thilo Dörk; Martine Dumont; Peter A Fasching; Jonine Figueroa; Dieter Flesch-Janys; Olivia Fletcher; Henrik Flyger; Florentia Fostira; Marilie Gammon; Graham G Giles; Pascal Guénel; Christopher A Haiman; Ute Hamann; Maartje J Hooning; John L Hopper; Anna Jakubowska; Farzana Jasmine; Mark Jenkins; Esther M John; Nichola Johnson; Michael E Jones; Maria Kabisch; Muhammad Kibriya; Julia A Knight; Linetta B Koppert; Veli-Matti Kosma; Vessela Kristensen; Loic Le Marchand; Eunjung Lee; Jingmei Li; Annika Lindblom; Robert Luben; Jan Lubinski; Kathi E Malone; Arto Mannermaa; Sara Margolin; Frederik Marme; Catriona McLean; Hanne Meijers-Heijboer; Alfons Meindl; Susan L Neuhausen; Heli Nevanlinna; Patrick Neven; Janet E Olson; Jose I A Perez; Barbara Perkins; Paolo Peterlongo; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Katri Pylkäs; Anja Rudolph; Regina Santella; Elinor J Sawyer; Rita K Schmutzler; Caroline Seynaeve; Mitul Shah; Martha J Shrubsole; Melissa C Southey; Anthony J Swerdlow; Amanda E Toland; Ian Tomlinson; Diana Torres; Thérèse Truong; Giske Ursin; Rob B Van Der Luijt; Senno Verhoef; Alice S Whittemore; Robert Winqvist; Hui Zhao; Shilin Zhao; Per Hall; Jacques Simard; Peter Kraft; Paul Pharoah; David Hunter; Douglas F Easton; Wei Zheng
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Efficient design for Mendelian randomization studies: subsample and 2-sample instrumental variable estimators.

Authors:  Brandon L Pierce; Stephen Burgess
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  59 in total

1.  Genetics of early growth traits.

Authors:  Diana L Cousminer; Rachel M Freathy
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 6.150

Review 2.  Effects of the Timing of Sex-Steroid Exposure in Adolescence on Adult Health Outcomes.

Authors:  Yee-Ming Chan; Amalia Feld; Elfa Jonsdottir-Lewis
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Using Mendelian randomization to evaluate the causal relationship between serum C-reactive protein levels and age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Xikun Han; Jue-Sheng Ong; Jiyuan An; Alex W Hewitt; Puya Gharahkhani; Stuart MacGregor
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Effect of age at puberty on risk of multiple sclerosis: A mendelian randomization study.

Authors:  Adil Harroud; John A Morris; Vincenzo Forgetta; Ruth Mitchell; George Davey Smith; Stephen J Sawcer; J Brent Richards
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 9.910

5.  Association of Genetic Variants Related to Gluteofemoral vs Abdominal Fat Distribution With Type 2 Diabetes, Coronary Disease, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors.

Authors:  Luca A Lotta; Laura B L Wittemans; Verena Zuber; Isobel D Stewart; Stephen J Sharp; Jian'an Luan; Felix R Day; Chen Li; Nicholas Bowker; Lina Cai; Emanuella De Lucia Rolfe; Kay-Tee Khaw; John R B Perry; Stephen O'Rahilly; Robert A Scott; David B Savage; Stephen Burgess; Nicholas J Wareham; Claudia Langenberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-12-25       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  An efficient and robust approach to Mendelian randomization with measured pleiotropic effects in a high-dimensional setting.

Authors:  Andrew J Grant; Stephen Burgess
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.899

7.  The Use Of Genetic Correlation And Mendelian Randomization Studies To Increase Our Understanding of Relationships Between Complex Traits.

Authors:  Peter Kraft; Hongjie Chen; Sara Lindström
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2020-05-16

8.  Mendelian randomisation for mediation analysis: current methods and challenges for implementation.

Authors:  Alice R Carter; Eleanor Sanderson; Gemma Hammerton; Rebecca C Richmond; George Davey Smith; Jon Heron; Amy E Taylor; Neil M Davies; Laura D Howe
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 9.  Statistical methods for mediation analysis in the era of high-throughput genomics: Current successes and future challenges.

Authors:  Ping Zeng; Zhonghe Shao; Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 7.271

10.  Genetic correlation and causal relationships between cardio-metabolic traits and lung function impairment.

Authors:  Matthias Wielscher; Andre F S Amaral; Diana van der Plaat; Louise V Wain; Sylvain Sebert; David Mosen-Ansorena; Juha Auvinen; Karl-Heinz Herzig; Abbas Dehghan; Debbie L Jarvis; Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 11.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.