| Literature DB >> 28835251 |
Yi Zhang1,2,3, Peng Xu4,5, Peiyang Li4,5, Keyi Duan4,5, Yuexin Wen6, Qin Yang6, Tao Zhang4,5, Dezhong Yao4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD) has been popularised for single-channel Electromyography (EMG) signal processing as it can effectively extract the temporal information of the EMG time series. However, few papers examine the temporal and spatial characteristics across multiple muscle groups in relation to multichannel EMG signals. EXPERIMENT: The experimental data was obtained from the Center for Machine Learning and Intelligent Systems, University of California Irvine (UCI). The data was donated by the Nueva Granada Military University and the Technopark node Manizales in Colombia. The databases of 11 male subjects from the healthy group were taken into the study. The subjects undergo three exercise programs, leg extension from a sitting position (sitting), flexion of the leg up (standing), and gait (walking), while four electrodes were placed on biceps femoris (BF), vastus medialis (VM), rectus femoris (RF), and semitendinosus (ST).Entities:
Keywords: EEMD; MEMD; Mode-alignment; Mode-mixing; Multichannel EMG signals; NA-MEMD
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28835251 PMCID: PMC5569569 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-017-0397-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Eng Online ISSN: 1475-925X Impact factor: 2.819
Fig. 3The decomposition result in the vastus medialis muscle group for three exercise programs (sitting, standing, and walking) for EEMD, MEMD and NA-MEMD. a EEMD; b MEMD; c NA-MEMD
Fig. 1The schematic diagram for EEMD, MEMD, and NA-MEMD
Fig. 2The schematic diagram for evaluation criterions
Fig. 4Spectra of normalized IMFs (IMF1-IMF4 for EEMD, IMF1-IMF5 for MEMD, and IMF1-IMF6 for NA-MEMD) obtained from four-channel EMG signals (RF, BF, VM, and ST) via EEMD (a), MEMD (b) and NA-MEMD (c). Overlapping of the frequency bands corresponding to the same-index IMFs is more prominent in the cases of MEMD and NA-MEMD but the NA-MEMD bands clearly show much better alignment
Statistics results for the number of IMFs by using EEMD, MEMED, and NA-MEMD for four-channel EMG signals related to lower-limb functional activities of daily living
| RF | BF | VM | ST | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sitting | ||||
| EMD | 12.27 ± 1.20 | 12.45 ± 1.29 | 12.09 ± 0.94 | 12.18 ± 0.75 |
| MEMD |
|
|
|
|
| NA-MEMD |
|
|
|
|
| Standing | ||||
| EMD | 12.27 ± 1.10 | 13.00 ± 0.63 | 12.18 ± 0.87 | 12.18 ± 1.60 |
| MEMD |
|
|
|
|
| NA-MEMD |
|
|
|
|
| Walking | ||||
| EMD | 10.73 ± 0.79 | 10.91 ± 0.54 | 10.54 ± 0.67 | 10.64 ± 0.67 |
| MEMD |
|
|
|
|
| NA-MEMD |
|
|
|
|
Italic values are statistically significant
Statistics results for the mode-alignment effects based on the motion segmentations of four-channel EMG signals from all subjects related to lower-limb functional activities of daily living
| Subject | Sitting | Standing | Walking | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMD | MEMD | NA-MEMD | EMD | MEMD | NA-MEMD | EMD | MEMD | NA-MEMD | |
| 1 | 0.73 | 0.78 |
| 0.65 | 0.74 |
|
| 0.79 | 0.78 |
| 2 | 0.73 | 0.78 |
| 0.65 | 0.74 |
| 0.62 | 0.78 |
|
| 3 | 0.72 | 0.82 |
| 0.68 | 0.80 |
| 0.67 | 0.80 |
|
| 4 | 0.68 | 0.78 |
|
| 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.71 |
| 0.76 |
| 5 |
| 0.70 |
| 0.72 | 0.80 |
| 0.51 | 0.71 |
|
| 6 | 0.66 | 0.64 |
| 0.80 |
| 0.80 | 0.81 |
| 0.81 |
| 7 | 0.43 |
| 0.77 | 0.68 | 0.88 |
| 0.61 | 0.66 |
|
| 8 | 0.54 | 0.82 |
| 0.69 | 0.88 |
| 0.50 | 0.55 |
|
| 9 | 0.71 | 0.87 |
| 0.68 | 0.90 |
| 0.64 |
| 0.79 |
| 10 | 0.59 | 0.90 |
| 0.60 | 0.82 |
| 0.76 | 0.77 |
|
| 11 | 0.81 | 0.83 |
| 0.62 | 0.86 |
| 0.34 | 0.57 |
|
| Mean | 0.67 | 0.79 |
| 0.69 | 0.82 |
| 0.64 | 0.73 |
|
| STD | 0.11 | 0.07 |
| 0.06 | 0.06 |
| 0.14 | 0.10 |
|
Italic values are statistically significant
Results of two-way ANOVA (exercise programs methods) for mode-alignment
| Source of variation | Sum of squares | Degree of freedom | Mean square | F-statistic | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise programs | 0.063 | 2 | 0.031 | 2.257 | 0.131 |
| Methods | 0.417 | 2 | 0.372 | 32.022** | 0.000 |
| Exercise | 0.006 | 4 | 0.003 | 0.342 | 0.717 |
| Programs × methods |
** p < 0.01 change within the methods among EEMD, MEMD, and NA-MEMD
Fig. 5One-way repeated measures ANOVA for EEMD versus MEMD, EEMD versus NA-MEMD, and MEMD versus NA-MEMD. The left subfigure indicates the comparative results for mode-alignment. The right one indicates those for mode-mixing
Statistics results for the mode-mixing effects based on the motion segmentations of four-channel EMG signals from all subjects related to lower-limb functional activities of daily living
| Subject | Sitting | Standing | Walking | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMD | MEMD | NA-MEMD | EMD | MEMD | NA-MEMD | EMD | MEMD | NA-MEMD | |
| 1 | 0.09 | 0.067 |
| 0.14 | 0.01 |
| 0.03 | 0.01 |
|
| 2 | 0.09 | 0.067 |
| 0.14 | 0.01 |
| 0.05 |
| 0.01 |
| 3 | 0.12 |
|
| 0.09 | 0.02 |
| 0.14 |
|
|
| 4 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.14 | 0.02 |
| 0.11 | 0.04 |
|
| 5 | 0.18 | 0.05 |
| 0.15 | 0.02 |
| 0.21 | 0.03 |
|
| 6 | 0.27 | 0.06 |
| 0.16 |
|
| 0.06 |
|
|
| 7 | 0.10 |
|
| 0.08 |
|
| 0.33 | 0.10 |
|
| 8 | 0.18 | 0.01 |
| 0.12 |
|
| 0.20 | 0.04 |
|
| 9 | 0.17 |
|
| 0.10 |
|
| 0.11 |
|
|
| 10 | 0.13 |
|
| 0.24 | 0.02 |
| 0.15 | 0.01 |
|
| 11 | 0.13 | 0.04 |
| 0.08 |
|
| 0.27 | 0.11 |
|
| Mean | 0.14 | 0.03 |
| 0.13 | 0.01 |
| 0.15 | 0.03 |
|
| STD | 0.06 | 0.03 |
| 0.05 | 0.01 |
| 0.09 | 0.04 |
|
Italic values are statistically significant
Results of two-way ANOVA (exercise programs methods) for mode-mixing
| Source of variation | Sum of squares | Degree of freedom | Mean square | F-statistic | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise programs | 0.004 | 1.344 | 0.003 | 0.644 | 0.481 |
| Methods | 0.368 | 1.234 | 0.299 | 138.687** | 0.000 |
| Exercise | 0.002 | 1.708 | 0.001 | 0.307 | 0.706 |
| Programs × methods |
change within the methods among EEMD, MEMD, and NA-MEMD