PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare central corneal thickness (CCT) values measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), noncontact specular microscopy (NCSM), and ultrasound pachymetry (USP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: CCT was measured in 182 healthy eyes without ocular abnormalities other than refractive errors. Three consecutive measurements of CCT by the same examiner were obtained during the same session. The testing sequence of AS-OCT and NCSM was randomly selected. The USP always was performed after the noncontact examinations. RESULTS: The average CCT measured by AS-OCT, NCSM, and USP were 535.8±35.5, 547.7±38.2, and 537.4±37.5 μm, respectively. The mean differences between modalities were 11.8±14.7 μm (P<0.01) between NCSM and AS-OCT, 10.3±17.7 μm (P<0.01) between NCSM and USP and 1.6±8.6 μm (P=0.02) between USP and AS-OCT. CONCLUSIONS: AS-OCT, NCSM, and USP showed an overall strong agreement in measuring CCT. However, CCT measurements with AS-OCT showed a good correlation to those obtained by USP, NCSM tended to give statistically significant higher CCT readings than either alternative and showed the worse repeatability indices. On the basis of our results, CCT measurement obtained with different instruments cannot be considered directly interchangeable.
PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare central corneal thickness (CCT) values measured with anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), noncontact specular microscopy (NCSM), and ultrasound pachymetry (USP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: CCT was measured in 182 healthy eyes without ocular abnormalities other than refractive errors. Three consecutive measurements of CCT by the same examiner were obtained during the same session. The testing sequence of AS-OCT and NCSM was randomly selected. The USP always was performed after the noncontact examinations. RESULTS: The average CCT measured by AS-OCT, NCSM, and USP were 535.8±35.5, 547.7±38.2, and 537.4±37.5 μm, respectively. The mean differences between modalities were 11.8±14.7 μm (P<0.01) between NCSM and AS-OCT, 10.3±17.7 μm (P<0.01) between NCSM and USP and 1.6±8.6 μm (P=0.02) between USP and AS-OCT. CONCLUSIONS: AS-OCT, NCSM, and USP showed an overall strong agreement in measuring CCT. However, CCT measurements with AS-OCT showed a good correlation to those obtained by USP, NCSM tended to give statistically significant higher CCT readings than either alternative and showed the worse repeatability indices. On the basis of our results, CCT measurement obtained with different instruments cannot be considered directly interchangeable.
Authors: M Isabel Casanova; Laura J Young; Sangwan Park; Soohyun Kim; Karolina Roszak; Brian C Leonard; Andrew Blandino; Monica J Motta; Glenn Yiu; Jennifer Y Li; Ala Moshiri; Sara M Thomasy Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 3.048