Literature DB >> 28833426

'Playing the game': How do surgical trainees seek feedback using workplace-based assessment?

Anne Gaunt1,2, Abhilasha Patel2, Victoria Rusius3, T James Royle4, Deborah H Markham5, Teresa Pawlikowska6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Although trainees and trainers find feedback interactions beneficial, difficulties in giving and receiving feedback are reported. Few studies have explored what drives trainees to seek feedback. This study explores how workplace-based assessments (WBAs) influence the ways surgical trainees seek feedback and feedback interactions.
METHODS: Utilising a template analysis approach, we conducted 10 focus groups with 42 surgical trainees from four regions across the UK. Data were independently coded by three researchers, incorporating three a priori themes identified from a previous quantitative study. Further themes emerged from exploration of these data. The final template, agreed by the three researchers, was applied to all focus group transcripts. The themes were linked in a diagrammatical form to allow critical exploration of the data.
RESULTS: Trainees' perceptions of the purpose of WBA for learning or an assessment of learning, and their relationship with their trainer impacted upon how trainees chose to use WBA. Perceiving WBA as a test led trainees to 'play the game': seek positive and avoid negative feedback through WBA. Perceiving WBA as a chance to learn led trainees to seek negative feedback. Some trainees sought negative feedback outside WBA. Negative feedback was more important for changing practice compared with positive feedback, which enabled trainees to 'look good' but had less of an effect on changing clinical practice. The timing of feedback relative to WBA was also important, with immediate feedback being more beneficial for learning; however, delayed feedback was still sought using WBA. DISCUSSION: Trainees' perceptions of the purpose of WBA and their relationship with their trainer informed when they chose to seek feedback. Trainees who perceived WBA as a test were led to 'play the game' by seeking positive and avoiding negative feedback. Outside of WBA, trainees sought negative feedback, which was most important for change in practice.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and The Association for the Study of Medical Education.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28833426     DOI: 10.1111/medu.13380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  10 in total

1.  Feedback Redefined: Principles and Practice.

Authors:  Subha Ramani; Karen D Könings; Shiphra Ginsburg; Cees Pm van der Vleuten
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Trust, power and learning in workplace-based assessment: The trainee perspective.

Authors:  Damian J Castanelli; Jennifer M Weller; Elizabeth Molloy; Margaret Bearman
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 7.647

3.  Harnessing Natural Language Processing to Support Decisions Around Workplace-Based Assessment: Machine Learning Study of Competency-Based Medical Education.

Authors:  Yusuf Yilmaz; Alma Jurado Nunez; Ali Ariaeinejad; Mark Lee; Jonathan Sherbino; Teresa M Chan
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2022-05-27

4.  Evaluation of a National Competency-Based Assessment System in Emergency Medicine: A CanDREAM Study.

Authors:  Brent Thoma; Andrew K Hall; Kevin Clark; Nazanin Meshkat; Warren J Cheung; Pierre Desaulniers; Cheryl Ffrench; Allison Meiwald; Christine Meyers; Catherine Patocka; Lorri Beatty; Teresa M Chan
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-08

5.  Self-regulated learning lens on trainee perceptions of the mini-CEX: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Eva Kipen; Eleanor Flynn; Robyn Woodward-Kron
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Driving lesson or driving test? : A metaphor to help faculty separate feedback from assessment.

Authors:  Paul L P Brand; A Debbie C Jaarsma; Cees P M van der Vleuten
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2021-01

Review 7.  Feedback and coaching.

Authors:  Adelle Atkinson; Christopher J Watling; Paul L P Brand
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 3.860

8.  How Trainees Come to Trust Supervisors in Workplace-Based Assessment: A Grounded Theory Study.

Authors:  Damian J Castanelli; Jennifer M Weller; Elizabeth Molloy; Margaret Bearman
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 7.840

9.  Barriers and facilitators to deliberate practice using take-home laparoscopic simulators.

Authors:  Vivienne I Blackhall; Jennifer Cleland; Philip Wilson; Susan J Moug; Kenneth G Walker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Work-Based Assessments in Higher General Surgical Training Program: A Mixed Methods Study Exploring Trainers' and Trainees' Views and Experiences.

Authors:  Kamal Raj Aryal; Chelise Currow; Sarah Downey; Raaj Praseedom; Alexander Seager
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2020-03-09
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.