Kirkland N Lozada1, Kathryn Morton2, Katelyn Stepan2, Joseph Capo1, Raymond L Chai2. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, New York Eye and Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai, New York, New York. 2. Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, U.S.A.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Fiberoptic laryngoscopy is dependent on accurate descriptions of examination findings. Traditional recording methods can be impractical for inpatient consults. Therefore, we aim to determine the utility of a smartphone-coupled portable recording system with flexible laryngoscopy for transmitting information between resident and attending physicians in a real-time setting. STUDY DESIGN: Pilot prospective study in a tertiary academic hospital. METHODS: This is a prospective study of inpatient consultations in a tertiary referral hospital over a 3-month period from April 2015 to June 2015. Flexible laryngoscopy was performed by a resident physician, and mobile recordings were relayed to an attending physician. Concordance of laryngoscopy interpretations between resident and attending physicians as well as changes in management were documented. RESULTS: Seventy-nine fiberoptic examinations were recorded and compared. Each consult was categorized as follows: airway evaluation (AE) (43%, 34/79), voice evaluation (VE) (3.7%, 3/79), dysphagia (D) (24%, 19/79), and aerodigestive tract mass/pathology (ADM) (29.1%, 23/79). Nine examinations showed discordance between resident and attending interpretations. Inter-rater agreement was good, with a kappa value of 0.747 (95% confidence interval: 0.643-0.851). The frequency of discordant exams within each group was as follows: AE (15%, 5/34), VE (33%, 1/3), D (11%, 2/19), and ADM (4.3%, 1/23). In five patients, changes in laryngoscopy interpretation changed clinical management. Seven nondiscordant exams had a change in management after attending review. Of the 79 exams, only one required repeat flexible laryngoscopy by the attending physician. CONCLUSIONS: Portable recording of flexible laryngoscopy is an effective tool for timely management of inpatient consultations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:818-822, 2018.
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Fiberoptic laryngoscopy is dependent on accurate descriptions of examination findings. Traditional recording methods can be impractical for inpatient consults. Therefore, we aim to determine the utility of a smartphone-coupled portable recording system with flexible laryngoscopy for transmitting information between resident and attending physicians in a real-time setting. STUDY DESIGN: Pilot prospective study in a tertiary academic hospital. METHODS: This is a prospective study of inpatient consultations in a tertiary referral hospital over a 3-month period from April 2015 to June 2015. Flexible laryngoscopy was performed by a resident physician, and mobile recordings were relayed to an attending physician. Concordance of laryngoscopy interpretations between resident and attending physicians as well as changes in management were documented. RESULTS: Seventy-nine fiberoptic examinations were recorded and compared. Each consult was categorized as follows: airway evaluation (AE) (43%, 34/79), voice evaluation (VE) (3.7%, 3/79), dysphagia (D) (24%, 19/79), and aerodigestive tract mass/pathology (ADM) (29.1%, 23/79). Nine examinations showed discordance between resident and attending interpretations. Inter-rater agreement was good, with a kappa value of 0.747 (95% confidence interval: 0.643-0.851). The frequency of discordant exams within each group was as follows: AE (15%, 5/34), VE (33%, 1/3), D (11%, 2/19), and ADM (4.3%, 1/23). In five patients, changes in laryngoscopy interpretation changed clinical management. Seven nondiscordant exams had a change in management after attending review. Of the 79 exams, only one required repeat flexible laryngoscopy by the attending physician. CONCLUSIONS: Portable recording of flexible laryngoscopy is an effective tool for timely management of inpatient consultations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:818-822, 2018.
Authors: Lauren E Miller; Vinay K Rathi; Elliott D Kozin; Matthew R Naunheim; Roy Xiao; Stacey T Gray Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 6.223