Literature DB >> 32701120

Telemedicine Services Provided to Medicare Beneficiaries by Otolaryngologists Between 2010 and 2018.

Lauren E Miller1,2, Vinay K Rathi1,3, Elliott D Kozin1,2, Matthew R Naunheim1,2, Roy Xiao1,2, Stacey T Gray1,2.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Clinicians are increasingly adopting telemedicine in an effort to expand patient access and efficiently deliver care. However, the extent to which otolaryngologists provide telemedicine services is unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize recent trends in the use of telemedicine by otolaryngologists to deliver care to Medicare beneficiaries. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2018, using publicly available Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary data on physicians practicing in the field of otolaryngology and benchmark specialties (dermatology and psychiatry) that provided telemedicine services to Medicare beneficiaries. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were the mean annual number of telemedicine services delivered per active physician and mean annual payment per active physician for these services. Secondary outcomes included the number, setting, and complexity of telemedicine services.
RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2018, otolaryngologists provided 2127 total telemedicine services (7 unique service types) to Medicare beneficiaries and received $88 574 in total payment for these services. During this period, the mean number of telemedicine services increased at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.0%, and the mean Medicare payment per otolaryngologist increased at a CAGR of 21.8%. In comparison, telemedicine use during this period generally increased at a higher rate in the fields of dermatology (mean number of services per active physician at CAGR of 13.0%; mean Medicare payment per active physician at CAGR of 12.5%) and psychiatry (mean number of services per active physician at CAGR of 25.8%; mean Medicare payment per active physician at CAGR of 26.6%). In 2018, outpatient evaluation and management visits accounted for most telemedicine services provided (337 of 353 [95.5%]) and the payments received ($17 542.13 of $18 470.47 [95.0%]) by otolaryngologists. In contrast, physicians in other specialties also provided substantial portions of telemedicine services in the inpatient (psychiatry, 18 403 of 198 478 [9.3%]; dermatology, 231 of 1034 [22.3%]) and skilled nursing facility settings (psychiatry, 14 690 of 198 478 [7.4%]; dermatology, 46 of 1034 [4.4%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study suggests that the extent to which otolaryngologists used telemedicine to deliver care to Medicare beneficiaries between 2010 and 2018 was rare. Although there was relative growth in the use of telemedicine by otolaryngologists during this period, absolute growth remained low. Policy makers and provider organizations should support otolaryngologists in the adoption of telemedicine technologies, especially while coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) viral suppression efforts necessitate prolonged restriction of physical clinic throughput.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32701120      PMCID: PMC7378874          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.1911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  20 in total

Review 1.  The Alaska experience using store-and-forward telemedicine for ENT care in Alaska.

Authors:  John Kokesh; A Stewart Ferguson; Chris Patricoski
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-10-02       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 2.  Telemedicine in Complex Diabetes Management.

Authors:  Marie E McDonnell
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.810

3.  Reported Cases of Medical Malpractice in Direct-to-Consumer Telemedicine.

Authors:  Alexander L Fogel; Joseph C Kvedar
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The Use Of Telemedicine By Physicians: Still The Exception Rather Than The Rule.

Authors:  Carol K Kane; Kurt Gillis
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Audiology Telemedicine Evaluations: Potential Expanded Applications.

Authors:  Kyle T Fletcher; Frank W Dicken; Margaret M Adkins; Trey A Cline; Beth N McNulty; Jennifer B Shinn; Matthew L Bush
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.497

6.  Telemedicine in laryngology: Remote evaluation of voice disorders-setup and initial experience.

Authors:  Paul C Bryson; Michael S Benninger; Jason Band; Philip Goetz; Andrew J Bowen
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 7.  A Review of the Use of Telemedicine in Dermatologic Surgery.

Authors:  Grace K Sohn; David J Wong; Siegrid S Yu
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.398

8.  Telemedicine--an efficient and cost-effective approach in parathyroid surgery.

Authors:  Andrew C Urquhart; Nina M Antoniotti; Richard L Berg
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Telemedicine in otolaryngology outpatient setting-single Center Head and Neck Surgery experience.

Authors:  Ryan A Rimmer; Vanessa Christopher; Ailsa Falck; Edmund de Azevedo Pribitkin; Joseph M Curry; Adam J Luginbuhl; David M Cognetti
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  An innovative smartphone-based otorhinoendoscope and its application in mobile health and teleotolaryngology.

Authors:  Cheng-Jung Wu; Sheng-Yu Wu; Po-Chun Chen; Yaoh-Shiang Lin
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 5.428

View more
  6 in total

1.  Laryngeal complications of COVID-19.

Authors:  Matthew R Naunheim; Allen S Zhou; Elefteria Puka; Ramon A Franco; Thomas L Carroll; Stephanie E Teng; Pavan S Mallur; Phillip C Song
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-10-30

2.  Tele-Otolaryngology at a Tertiary Care Center in North India During COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown: A Validated Patient Feedback Questionnaire Based Study.

Authors:  Ramya Rathod; Kanika Arora; Karthika Chettuvati; Sajith Abraham; Prerna Angrish; Vikas Sharma; Ganesh Agarwal; Manjul Muraleedharan; Reshma Raj; Naresh K Panda; Jaimanti Bakshi; Satyawati Mohindra; Rijuneeta Gupta; Roshan Verma; Sandeep Bansal; Anurag Ramavat; Gyanaranjan Nayak; Sourabha K Patro; Ashok Kumar; Ramandeep S Virk
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-06-04

3.  Kuwaiti hospital patients' continuance intention to use telemedical systems in the wake of the COVID19 pandemic.

Authors:  Ibtisam L F H Almutairi; Bodoor F Alazemi; Faisal L F H Almutairi
Journal:  Healthc Technol Lett       Date:  2021-12-08

4.  Smartphone-Enabled versus Conventional Otoscopy in Detecting Middle Ear Disease: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Chih-Hao Chen; Chii-Yuan Huang; Hsiu-Lien Cheng; Heng-Yu Haley Lin; Yuan-Chia Chu; Chun-Yu Chang; Ying-Hui Lai; Mao-Che Wang; Yen-Fu Cheng
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-13

Review 5.  Methods of Reimbursement for Telemedicine Services: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Farzad Salmanizadeh; Arefeh Ameri; Kambiz Bahaadinbeigy
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2022-06-22

Review 6.  New Frontiers in Managing the Dizzy Patient.

Authors:  Desi P Schoo; Bryan K Ward
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 1.866

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.