| Literature DB >> 28832638 |
Bruce R Forsberg1, John M Melack2, Thomas Dunne2, Ronaldo B Barthem3, Michael Goulding4, Rodrigo C D Paiva5, Mino V Sorribas5, Urbano L Silva6, Sabine Weisser7.
Abstract
Increased energy demand has led to plans for building many new dams in the western Amazon, mostly in the Andean region. Historical data and mechanistic scenarios are used to examine potential impacts above and below six of the largest dams planned for the region, including reductions in downstreamEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28832638 PMCID: PMC5568116 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182254
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Amazon basin, showing main hydrological and geomorphological features and locations of proposed Andean dams.
Locations of river gauging stations and lowland dams mentioned in the text indicated. Topography derived from the Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission Digital Elevation Model, National Aeronautics and Space Administrations, USA (SRTM-DEM, NASA).
Fig 2Locations of planned Andean dams and the Loreto fishing territory.
Impacted tributaries, relevant gauging stations and key geomorphological features are indicated. Topography derived from NASA, SRTM-DEM [60].
Expected characteristics of six planned Andean dams.
| Dam | Country | River | MW | Basin Area | Reservoir | Reservoir | Inflow, |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angosto del Bala | Bolivia | Beni | 1600 | 69.8 | 1,048 | 200 | 646 |
| TAM 40 | Peru | Ucayali | 1286 | 123.6 | n.a. | n.a. | 1,337 |
| Pongo de Aguirre | Peru | Huallaga | 750 | 69.4 | n.a. | n.a. | 941 |
| Pongo de Manseriche | Peru | Marañón | 4500 | 114.2 | 7204 | 7,420 | 1,582 |
| Rositas | Bolivia | Grande | 400 | 59.2 | 241 | 125 | 95 |
| Inambari | Peru | Inambari | 1500 | 18.3 | 319 | 158 | 487 |
a [2, supplemental data].
b estimated here, using dam location, specified reservoir surface elevation and SRTM–DEM [60]; water inflow = measured discharge at dam site.
c [18].
d [61], inflow for TAM40 dam estimated from discharge measured at Lagartos gauging station, corrected by ratio of basin areas above these sites, assuming similar runoff.
e B. Forsberg, unpublished data
n.a. = not available.
Fig 3Locations of A) Balbina Dam on the Uatumã River and B) Tucurui Dam on the Tocantins River, showing reservoirs and locations of downstream gauging stations. Cachoeira Morena and Tucurui gauging stations are indicated below the dams. Station locations from the Brazilian National Water Agency, ANA [70]. Reservoir area derived from NASA, SRTM-DEM and LANDSAT imagery [60].
Predicted reduction in sediment discharge below six planned Andean dams following impoundment.
| Dam | Predicted reduction in |
|---|---|
| Angosto del Bala | 243 |
| TAM 40 | 272 |
| Pongo de Aguirre | 57 |
| Pongo de Manseriche | 166 |
| Rosita | 138 |
| Inambari | 18 |
| TOTAL | 894 |
Estimates assume that 100% of suspended and bedload sediments are retained by all dams.
a [18].
b [61].
c B. Forsberg, unpublished data.
Predicted reduction in nutrient fluxes below six Andean dams after impoundment.
| Dam | Current fluxes | With dam | Reduction | % change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP | TN | TP | TN | TP | TN | TP | TN | |
| Angosto del Bala | 0.177 | 0.233 | 0.002 | 0.021 | 0.175 | 0.212 | -99 | -91 |
| TAM 40 | 0.201 | 0.280 | 0.005 | 0.043 | 0.196 | 0.237 | -98 | -85 |
| Pongo de Aguirre | 0.044 | 0.080 | 0.003 | 0.030 | 0.041 | 0.049 | -92 | -62 |
| Pongo de Manseriche | 0.125 | 0.195 | 0.006 | 0.051 | 0.119 | 0.144 | -95 | -74 |
| Rosita | 0.100 | 0.124 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.100 | 0.121 | -100 | -98 |
| Inambari | 0.015 | 0.031 | 0.002 | 0.016 | 0.013 | 0.016 | -88 | -50 |
| TOTAL | 0.662 | 0.944 | 0.019 | 0.164 | 0.643 | 0.780 | -97 | -83 |
Estimates assume 100% retention of particulate fractions and no retention of dissolved fractions. Sources for data used in calculations: [18, 61, 5], B. Forsberg, unpublished data, CAMREX PROJECT (http://dx.doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/904).
Fig 4Changes in average monthly stage heights and inundation periods for stage heights of the Uatumã River below Balbina dam (A and B, respectively) and of the Tocantins River below Tucurui dam (C and D, respectively), following impoundment. Pre-construction periods (blue line) = 1973–1982 for Balbina and 1969–1975 for Tucurui; post impoundment periods (red line) = 1991–2011 for Balbina and 1985–2014 for Tucurui. Stage data obtained from Brazilian National Water Agency, ANA [70]. Standard error bars indicated.
Regression models: Influence of inundation and fishing effort on annual fish yield in Loreto, considering the effect of different time lags after inundation.
| Regression model | Time lag (years after inund.)/r2 | Equation parameters, 2 year lag | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | a | sa | b | sb | c | sc | |
| TY = a+b | - | 0.07 | 0.75 | 0.26 | 0.07 | - | -25,723 | 9,655 | 1.50 | 0.32 | ||
| TY = a+b | 0.15 | - | - | 0.03 | - | - | ||||||
| TY = a+b | - | - | 0.70 | 0.14 | - | - | ns | ns | 1.50 | 0.35 | ns | ns |
| TY = a+b | 0.01 | - | - | - | - | - | ||||||
| YFFZ = a+b | - | 0.06 | 0.83 | 0.28 | 0.14 | - | -22,755 | 6,288 | 1.20 | 0.21 | ||
| YFFZ = a+b | 0.19 | - | - | 0.02 | - | - | ||||||
TY = total yield, tons y-1; YFZ = yield for regularly exploited fishing zones, tons y-1; FZ (fishing effort) = number of fishing zones; MxFA = maximum flooding area, km2 and MiFA = minimum flooding area, km2; Regression parameters (a, b and c) only shown for significant regressions with 2 year lag; r2 = % variance in yield explained by regression; s = standard error of parameter; ns = not significant.
* indicates significance at p< 0.05 level.
Fig 5Relationship between total annual fish yield and the maximum flooded area two years earlier for the Loreto Region of Peru.
Flooded areas simulated using the MGB-IPH large scale numerical hydrological model, developed specifically for the Amazon Basin [71, 72]. Annual fish yields obtained from DIREPRO (Dirección Regional de Producción, Peru).
Fig 6Predicted decline in annual fish yield for the Loreto Region due to a reduction in maximum annual flooded area following impoundment.
Relation simulated using percentage changes in average maximum flooded area (MxFA) and regression model: Y = 1.5(MxFA) − 25,723, with a 2 year lag.
Predicted fish for 4 planned Andean reservoirs.
| Reservoir | Reservoir | Fish yield, tons y-1 |
|---|---|---|
| Angosta del Bala | 1,048 | 2,211 |
| Pongo de Manseriche | 7,204 | 15,200 |
| Rositas | 241 | 509 |
| Inambari | 319 | 673 |
a Determined from estimates of phytoplankton production (FP) [76] and published relationship between FP and fish yield for tropical lakes [77].
Predicted sediment filling times for 4 planned Andean reservoirs.
| Reservoir | Fill time, years |
|---|---|
| Angosta del Bala | 106 |
| Pongo de Manseriche | 6240 |
| Rositas | 126 |
| Inambari | 1225 |
a Calculated from expected reservoir volume and estimates of sediment inflow [18,61] and density [79, 80].
Estimated average CO2-equivalent carbon emissions for the reservoirs and downstream reaches of 4 planned Andean dams during the first 30 years of operation.
| Dam | MW | 30 year mean emission, 105 tons C-CO2e y-1 | Emission Factor | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reservoir | Downstream | Total | |||
| Angosta del Bala | 1600 | 6.4 | 3.8 | 10.2 | 0.072 |
| Pongo de Manseriche | 4500 | 71.8 | 9.3 | 81.1 | 0.206 |
| Rositas | 400 | 1.2 | 0.6 | 1.8 | 0.051 |
| Inambari | 1500 | 1.5 | 2.9 | 4.4 | 0.034 |
| Total | 8,000 | 80.9 | 16.6 | 97.5 | mean 0.091 |
a Reservoir emissions estimated following [82].
b Downstream emissions estimated following [88].
c Carbon Emission Factors estimated from mean total CO2 equivalent emission and specified power generation.
Fig 7Predicted emissions of CO2-equivalent carbon upstream and downstream of Manseriche Dam during the first 30 years of operation.
Reservoir emissions estimated following [82]. Downstream emissions estimated following [88].
Fig 8Historical variation of mercury levels in Cichla spp.(blue line) and in the hair of fish-eating residents (red line) from Balbina Reservoir following impoundment.
Data from [95] and B. Forsberg, unpublished.
Fig 9Summary: Expected environmental impacts above and below Andean dams.