Dominique Saragaglia1, Loic Sigwalt2, Julia Gaillot2, Vincent Morin2, Brice Rubens-Duval2, Régis Pailhé2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sport Traumatology, Grenoble South Teaching Hospital, 38130, Échirolles, France. DSaragaglia@chu-grenoble.fr. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sport Traumatology, Grenoble South Teaching Hospital, 38130, Échirolles, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyse the clinical and radiographic results of 208 e-Motion® posterior cruciate-retaining, mobile bearing prostheses (BBraun-Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) fitted using computer navigation, for knee osteoarthritis with a genu varum greater than 10°. METHODS: One hundred ninety-two patients were operated on with 208 e-Motion® prostheses fitted, between January 2006 and December 2011, using the OrthoPilot® computer navigation system. Average pre-operative IKS score was 70 ± 27 points (6-143) with a function score of 38 ± 20.5 (0-90) and a knee score of 32.5 ± 13 (0-63). Average flexion was 116.5° ± 13° (65-140°). Average pre-operative HKA angle was 166° ± 3° (154-169°). RESULTS: 2Results are available for 134 patients, with a total of 150 knees operated on (38 lost to follow-up and 20 deceased). Average follow-up was 104.5 months (60-116 months). On last follow-up, the average IKS was 180 ± 22 points (95-200) with 86.5 ± 16 points (25-100) for the function score and 93.5 ± 8 points (55-100) for the knee score. Knee flexion was 116° ± 10.5° (80-135°) and average HKA angle was 179° ± 2° (175-184°). The pre-operative objective was achieved in 90.5% of knees. CONCLUSION: The e-Motion® mobile bearing posterior cruciate-retaining prosthesis, fitted using computer navigation, offers excellent results after an average of 8.5 years follow-up. These results are at least equivalent, even superior, to those of the posterior-stabilised prostheses usually used for this type of deformity.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyse the clinical and radiographic results of 208 e-Motion® posterior cruciate-retaining, mobile bearing prostheses (BBraun-Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) fitted using computer navigation, for knee osteoarthritis with a genu varum greater than 10°. METHODS: One hundred ninety-two patients were operated on with 208 e-Motion® prostheses fitted, between January 2006 and December 2011, using the OrthoPilot® computer navigation system. Average pre-operative IKS score was 70 ± 27 points (6-143) with a function score of 38 ± 20.5 (0-90) and a knee score of 32.5 ± 13 (0-63). Average flexion was 116.5° ± 13° (65-140°). Average pre-operative HKA angle was 166° ± 3° (154-169°). RESULTS: 2Results are available for 134 patients, with a total of 150 knees operated on (38 lost to follow-up and 20 deceased). Average follow-up was 104.5 months (60-116 months). On last follow-up, the average IKS was 180 ± 22 points (95-200) with 86.5 ± 16 points (25-100) for the function score and 93.5 ± 8 points (55-100) for the knee score. Knee flexion was 116° ± 10.5° (80-135°) and average HKA angle was 179° ± 2° (175-184°). The pre-operative objective was achieved in 90.5% of knees. CONCLUSION: The e-Motion® mobile bearing posterior cruciate-retaining prosthesis, fitted using computer navigation, offers excellent results after an average of 8.5 years follow-up. These results are at least equivalent, even superior, to those of the posterior-stabilised prostheses usually used for this type of deformity.
Entities:
Keywords:
Computer-assisted; Knee; Navigation; Osteoarthritis; Severe genu varum; Total knee arthroplasty
Authors: Peter C M Verdonk; Jerome Pernin; Alban Pinaroli; Tarik Ait Si Selmi; Philippe Neyret Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2009-03-17 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Wolf Petersen; Ingo Volker Rembitzki; Gerd-Peter Brüggemann; Andree Ellermann; Raymond Best; Andreas Gösele- Koppenburg; Christian Liebau Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2013-09-22 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Fabricio Bolpato Loures; Wesley Correia; João Henrique Reis; Rodrigo Sattamini Pires E Albuquerque; Alan de Paula Mozela; Eduardo Branco de Souza; Phelippe Valente Maia; João Maurício Barretto Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2018-09-14 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Michele d'Amato; Andrea Ensini; Alberto Leardini; Paolo Barbadoro; Andrea Illuminati; Claudio Belvedere Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2018-09-08 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Omar A Al-Mohrej; Faris O Alshammari; Abdulrahman M Aljuraisi; Lujain A Bin Amer; Emad M Masuadi; Nader S Al-Kenani Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Benjamin Puliero; Henri Favreau; David Eichler; Philippe Adam; François Bonnomet; Matthieu Ehlinger Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 3.075