Literature DB >> 18358374

Cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with at least fifteen degrees of coronal plane deformity.

Paul Kubiak1, Michael J Archibeck, Richard E White.   

Abstract

There has been debate regarding the superiority of posterior stabilized (PS) or cruciate-retaining knee designs in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The proponents of PS TKA argue that a relative contraindication to the use of cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty is that of significant coronal plane deformity. The purpose of this study is to compare our minimum 10-year results of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining TKAs in patients with preoperative coronal plane deformity of at least 15 degrees (> or =10 degrees of varus or > or =20 degrees of valgus) to historical results of PS TKA designs in similar patients. We found, at a minimum 10-year follow-up, very good results with a 93% (95% confidence interval, 87%-98%) revision-free survivorship at 10 years and no revisions for instability or loosening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18358374     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  9 in total

1.  Posterior-stabilized versus posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Frank R Kolisek; Michael S McGrath; David R Marker; Nenette Jessup; Thorsten M Seyler; Michael A Mont; C Lowry Barnes
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2009

2.  Unconstrained arthroplasty in type II valgus knees: posterior stabilized or cruciate retaining?

Authors:  Chia Liang Ang; Stephanie Fook; Shi Lu Chia; Pak Lin Chin; Ngai Nung Lo; Seng Jin Yeo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-22       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Results with eight and a half years average follow-up on two hundred and eight e-Motion FP® knee prostheses, fitted using computer navigation for knee osteoarthritis in patients with over ten degrees genu varum.

Authors:  Dominique Saragaglia; Loic Sigwalt; Julia Gaillot; Vincent Morin; Brice Rubens-Duval; Régis Pailhé
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  International comparative evaluation of fixed-bearing non-posterior-stabilized and posterior-stabilized total knee replacements.

Authors:  Thomas Comfort; Valborg Baste; Miquel Angel Froufe; Robert Namba; Barbara Bordini; Otto Robertsson; Guy Cafri; Elizabeth Paxton; Art Sedrakyan; Stephen Graves
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  No impact of severe varus deformity on clinical outcome after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bum-Sik Lee; Sang-Jin Lee; Jong-Min Kim; Dae-Hee Lee; Eun-Jong Cha; Seong-Il Bin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Arthroplasty in the Valgus Knee: Comparison and Discussion of Lateral vs Medial Parapatellar Approaches and Implant Selection.

Authors:  Jai Rawal; Adam J Devany; James A Jeffery
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2015-05-15

7.  Total knee arthroplasty in patients with extra-articular deformity.

Authors:  Kaushik Hazratwala; Brent Matthews; Matthew Wilkinson; Sergio Barroso-Rosa
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2016-01-12

8.  Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with severe varus deformity.

Authors:  Ethem Ayhan Ünkar; Yusuf Öztürkmen; Erhan Şükür; Engin Çarkçı; Murat Mert
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 1.511

9.  Lateral or medial approach for valgus knee in total knee arthroplasty - which one is better? A systematic review.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Dan Xing; Jiao Jiao Li; Yuanyuan Zhu; Shengjie Dong; Bin Zhao
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 1.671

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.