| Literature DB >> 28831179 |
Li-Hsing Chi1,2,3, Wei-Min Chang2, Yu-Chan Chang2, Yung-Chieh Chan2, Chia-Chen Tai2, Kam-Wing Leung4,5, Chi-Long Chen6,7, Alexander Th Wu1, Tsung-Ching Lai8, Yu-Chuan Jack Li9,10, Michael Hsiao11,12,13.
Abstract
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) represents a major health concern worldwide. We applied the matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) to analyze paired normal (N) and tumor (T) samples from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma as well as liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis in HNSCC cell lines to identify tumor-associated biomarkers. Our results showed a number of proteins found to be over-expressed in HNSCC. We identified thymosin beta-4 X-linked (TMSB4X) is one of the most significant candidate biomarkers. Higher TMSB4X expression in the tumor was found by N/T-paired HNSCC samples at both RNA and protein level. Overexpression of TMSB4X was found significantly associated with poor prognosis of overall survival (OS, P = 0.006) and recurrence-free survival (RFS, P = 0.013) in HNSCC patients. Silencing of TMSB4X expression in HNSCC cell line reduced the proliferation and invasion ability in vitro, as well as inhibited the cervical lymph node metastasis in vivo. Altogether, our global proteomics analysis identified that TMSB4X is a newly discovered biomarker in HNSCC whose functions resulted in enhanced proliferation and metastasis in vitro and in vivo. TMSB4X may be a potential therapeutic target for treating HNSCC patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28831179 PMCID: PMC5567379 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09539-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Identify the biomarker through MALDI imaging mass spectrometry (MALDI IMS). (A) Overview of the strategy used for identification of the biomarkers of HNSCC. (B) Profiling of stage I, II, III and IV of HNSCC proteomes from MALDI IMS by the ClinProTools analysis. (C) Peaks found in Normal (OMF and NHOK) and cancer cells (TW1.5 and CAL27). (D) The left panel represented the histomorphology of clinical HNSCC samples subject to MALDI IMS analysis after H&E stain. The right panel showed the intensity distribution of 4968.1 m/z, which was stronger in advanced stages. Red arrow: the intensity of T > the intensity of N.
Peak statistics (candidates listed with T/N > 1).
| Mass | PTTA | Ave_N | Ave_T | Std_N | Std_T | T/N |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10099.8 | 7.98E-16 | 341.9 | 1509.6 | 188.2 | 1009.9 | 4.415 |
| 10900.9 | 3.64E-17 | 113.6 | 425.3 | 40.6 | 253.0 | 3.744 |
| 4048.6 | 7.34E-13 | 18.4 | 47.7 | 3.5 | 30.5 | 2.597 |
| 11659.2 | 1.17E-07 | 300.6 | 733.7 | 222.4 | 321.3 | 2.441 |
| 10306.9 | 1.86E-15 | 104.2 | 247.2 | 34.7 | 111.2 | 2.373 |
| 9756.5 | 2.75E-13 | 31.4 | 71.6 | 8.1 | 38.8 | 2.277 |
| 4968.1 | 0.0147 | 28.0 | 62.8 | 14.0 | 109.8 | 2.241 |
| 11731.0 | 0.000000000183 | 69.9 | 150.2 | 27.1 | 78.6 | 2.148 |
| 11370.2 | 0.00000394 | 576.2 | 1237.7 | 362.1 | 828.0 | 2.148 |
| 10532.3 | 0.000000000000000772 | 48.4 | 96.7 | 11.6 | 35.8 | 2.000 |
| 22696.7 | 0.000282 | 10.5 | 20.7 | 4.5 | 19.2 | 1.910 |
| 22777.9 | 0.00000208 | 10.5 | 19.7 | 5.3 | 9.6 | 1.88 |
| 8459.8 | 0.000000106 | 39.7 | 74.6 | 12.8 | 45.5 | 1.877 |
| 5048.9 | 0.00000000118 | 94.1 | 175.6 | 19.2 | 99.2 | 1.867 |
| 4937.5 | 0.000778 | 14.4 | 26.6 | 5.2 | 27.2 | 1.845 |
| 17892.5 | 0.00000593 | 12.7 | 23.2 | 6.1 | 12.7 | 1.828 |
| 27819.3 | 0.00126 | 8.8 | 15.7 | 4.3 | 14.6 | 1.779 |
| 5449.7 | 0.0000000539 | 37.3 | 65.9 | 13.8 | 25 | 1.766 |
| 9850.0 | 0.00000000498 | 15 | 24.9 | 4.1 | 9.8 | 1.666 |
| 5828.8 | 0.0000709 | 86.1 | 134.7 | 35.6 | 52.6 | 1.564 |
| 4328.4 | 0.000247 | 20.4 | 31.8 | 6.8 | 20.7 | 1.561 |
| 10750.8 | 0.0000051 | 37.7 | 58.5 | 12.7 | 21.2 | 1.552 |
| 5685.1 | 0.000778 | 107.8 | 165.1 | 40.9 | 105 | 1.531 |
| 16799.2 | 0.00103 | 36.3 | 54.7 | 15.4 | 29.3 | 1.507 |
| 12698.5 | 0.00438 | 582.2 | 874.3 | 297.6 | 471.2 | 1.502 |
| 6123.7 | 0.00000000118 | 58.5 | 87.8 | 10.9 | 29.1 | 1.502 |
| 13238.6 | 0.0082 | 220.6 | 323.9 | 110.3 | 192.5 | 1.468 |
| 9377.6 | 0.0000276 | 37.6 | 54.9 | 9.9 | 25.4 | 1.459 |
| 5151.1 | 0.00000622 | 43.2 | 62.8 | 10.7 | 26.4 | 1.455 |
| 8572.3 | 0.0187 | 136.6 | 196.1 | 70.4 | 132.5 | 1.436 |
| 9627.0 | 0.000000477 | 40.7 | 58 | 8 | 21.6 | 1.425 |
| 13162.6 | 0.0316 | 1249.8 | 1778.5 | 778.9 | 947.3 | 1.423 |
| 13372.6 | 0.041 | 207 | 284.5 | 117.7 | 158.2 | 1.375 |
| 8408.0 | 0.0025 | 59.9 | 82.1 | 21.9 | 31.9 | 1.372 |
| 11834.7 | 0.0147 | 75.9 | 102.9 | 35.4 | 36.1 | 1.356 |
| 3584.5 | 0.018 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 1.5 | 3.1 | 1.356 |
| 8649.1 | 0.0191 | 68.3 | 90.8 | 29.4 | 41.1 | 1.329 |
| 6349.4 | 0.0105 | 183 | 242 | 71.9 | 84.8 | 1.323 |
| 5361.5 | 0.00732 | 92 | 120.3 | 27.8 | 57.5 | 1.307 |
| 8966.4 | 0.0237 | 65.4 | 85.4 | 29.4 | 24.1 | 1.305 |
| 10453.9 | 0.00151 | 43.4 | 56.6 | 8.4 | 28.2 | 1.302 |
| 11988.4 | 0.0411 | 48.8 | 63.5 | 23.5 | 24.1 | 1.301 |
| 12908.6 | 0.0105 | 80.8 | 104.7 | 23.7 | 54.1 | 1.296 |
| 9161.8 | 0.0328 | 24.6 | 31.4 | 10.7 | 9 | 1.277 |
| 8190.8 | 0.0187 | 44.6 | 56.6 | 16.4 | 16.5 | 1.268 |
| 4133.2 | 0.0246 | 8.8 | 11 | 2.8 | 4.9 | 1.251 |
| 5269.0 | 0.018 | 34.7 | 41.4 | 8.5 | 12.6 | 1.195 |
| 5935.0 | 0.0274 | 23.6 | 28 | 6.1 | 8.7 | 1.186 |
T_Std: the mass standard deviation of tumor specimen, T_Ave: the averaged intensity of tumor specimen; N_Std: the mass standard deviation of normal tissue, N_Ave: the averaged intensity of normal tissue; PTTA: the P value of the t test/ANOVA of the individual peak; T/N: the ratio of Ave_T/Ave_N.
Figure 2LC-MS/MS analysis of TMSB4X. The data showed sequencing of the trypsinized peptide K.ETIEQKQAGES, which was identified as TMSB4X in CAL27 cell line. Peptide sequencing was indicated by matching B-ions (red) and Y-ions (blue) fragments. B-ions: the charge is retained by the amino-terminal part of the peptide. Y-ions: the charge is retained by the carboxyl-terminal part of the peptide.
Figure 3TMSB4X has higher RNA or protein expression level in tumor samples than in normal adjacent tissues, which was demonstrated in 3 independent HNSCC cohorts. (A,B) Showed the expression changes of TMSB4X in 35 NT-paired samples of KVGH cohort by RT-PCR and real-time PCR, respectively. (C) TMSB4X (216438_s_at) expression in 23 NT-paired HNSCC cohort in microarray dataset, GSE31056. (D) IHC staining in tissue microarray from 31 NT-paired HNSCC samples of TMUH cohort, representative 3 NT-paired images. (E) TMSB4X IHC expression was scored by multiplying intensity and percentage. The P value was calculated by paired t-test.
The correlation analysis of TMSB4X expression and clinicopathological features in HNSCC cohort.
| Features | Case no | TMSB4X expression |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low(n = 27) (%) | High(n = 59) (%) | |||||
| Age at diagnosis | ||||||
| <65 y | 70 | 22 | 31.4% | 48 | 68.6% | 0.989 |
| >=65 y | 16 | 5 | 31.3% | 11 | 68.8% | |
| Gender | ||||||
| Male | 79 | 24 | 30.4% | 55 | 69.6% | 0.495 |
| Female | 7 | 3 | 42.9% | 4 | 57.1% | |
| T Status | ||||||
| T1 + T2 | 60 | 22 | 36.7% | 38 | 63.3% | 0.110 |
| T3 + T4 | 26 | 5 | 19.2% | 21 | 80.8% | |
| N Status | ||||||
| N0 | 59 | 18 | 30.5% | 41 | 69.5% | 0.793 |
| N1-N3 | 27 | 9 | 33.3% | 18 | 66.7% | |
| M Status | ||||||
| M0 | 84 | 27 | 32.1% | 57 | 67.9% | 0.333 |
| M1 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 100.0% | |
|
| ||||||
| Stage I + II | 45 | 15 | 33.3% | 30 | 66.7% | 0.685 |
| Stage III + IV | 41 | 12 | 29.3% | 29 | 70.7% | |
| Recurrence | ||||||
| No | 32 | 15 | 46.9% | 17 | 53.1% | 0.017* |
| Yes | 54 | 12 | 22.2% | 42 | 77.8% | |
Figure 4Higher TMSB4X IHC expression is correlated with poor prognosis in HNSCC cohort. (A) The representative images with different IHC intensity of TMSB4X. Scale bar represents 50 µm. (B,C) Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS (P = 0.006) and RFS (P = 0.013) were categorized by TMSB4X level. Patients with high TMSB4X had significantly poor prognosis. Statistics was calculated by log-rank test.
Univariate/Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses on OS and RFS time of TMSB4X gene expression in HNSCC.
| Features | Univariate analysis of OS |
| Multivariate analysis of OS |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI (L) | 95% CI (H) | HR | 95% CI (L) | 95% CI (H) | ||||
|
| |||||||||
| T1 + T2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| T3 + T4 | 3.22 | 1.67 | 6.23 | 0.001* | 2.62 | 1.31 | 5.23 | 0.006* | |
|
| |||||||||
| N0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| N1-N3 | 2.06 | 1.06 | 4.01 | 0.033* | 1.73 | 0.87 | 3.45 | 0.121 | |
|
| |||||||||
| Low | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| High | 3.26 | 1.35 | 7.89 | 0.009* | 3.12 | 1.27 | 7.63 | 0.013* | |
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
| |||||||||
| T1 + T2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| T3 + T4 | 1.89 | 1.08 | 3.31 | 0.027* | 1.56 | 0.87 | 2.79 | 0.132 | |
|
| |||||||||
| N0 | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| N1-N3 | 1.74 | 0.99 | 3.04 | 0.050 | 1.61 | 0.91 | 2.83 | 0.101 | |
|
| |||||||||
| Low | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| High | 2.21 | 1.16 | 4.21 | 0.016* | 2.07 | 1.08 | 3.98 | 0.028* | |
*P < 0.05 (Cox proportional hazards regression analyses). The 95% confidence interval (CI) for the hazard ratio (HR) in overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS).
Figure 5Cell function assays. Knockdown TMSB4X in SAS cells may inhibit their cell proliferation and invasion ability in vitro, as well as suppress cervical LN metastasis in vivo. (A) The panel of TMSB4X expression level in 6 HNSCC cell lines by RT-PCR. The relative aggressive SAS cells have abundant TMSB4X. (B) In TMSB4X knockdown clones of SAS, the expression was revealed by RT-PCR. (C) The growth curves of TMSB4X knockdown clones of SAS. (D) The invasion ability of TMSB4X knockdown clones of SAS was performed by Boyden chamber assay. Cell photography and number were taken and counted at 200x magnification (high power field, HPF). (E) Bioluminescence images were taken from the buccal orthotopic xenograft mouse model. The total flux of bioluminescence was measured separately at mouse buccal (Tumor) and neck lymph node (LN metastasis). (F) The box-plot of LN metastasis was drawn according to the total flux value in region of interest (ROI). Asteroid *denotes P < 0.05. Statistics was calculated by student t-test. (shTb4-1: clone1 with shRNA-TMSB4X).