Literature DB >> 14991891

Immunophenotypic analysis of inflammatory breast cancers: identification of an 'inflammatory signature'.

Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret1, Carole Tarpin, Valérie-Jeanne Bardou, François Bertucci, Christophe Ginestier, Anne-Chantal Braud, Brigitte Puig, Jeannine Geneix, Jacques Hassoun, Daniel Birnbaum, Jocelyne Jacquemier, Patrice Viens.   

Abstract

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare but very aggressive form of breast cancer. Its definition is based on clinical criteria, but a molecular definition could be useful when data are incomplete or features are missing. Recently, the identification of overexpression of E-cadherin in IBC has improved understanding of the molecular basis of this disease. Consequently, the aim of this study was to try to determine an immunophenotypic 'signature' of IBC. A series of 80 cases of IBC were compared with 552 non-IBC control cases and a model was elaborated to evaluate the probability of an inflammatory carcinoma being present in any clinical situation. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were used to determine the immunohistochemical profile of eight proteins including E-cadherin, EGFR, oestrogen and progesterone receptor (ER and PR), MIB1, ERBB2, MUC1, and P53. All the parameters tested were differentially expressed between IBC and control cases in univariate analysis (p < 0.001). The five variables that were significantly associated with IBC in multivariate analysis were E-cadherin > or = 300 [HR = 5.64 (2.92-10.87)], ER negative [HR = 3.00 (1.67-5.51)], MIB1 > 20 [HR = 3.54 (1.87-6.71)], MUC1 cytoplasmic staining [HR = 2.72 (1.49-4.96)], and ERBB2 positive 2+ or 3+ [HR = 2.46 (1.26-4.78)]. The probability that a breast cancer with this full phenotype at diagnosis was an IBC was 90.5%. If any one of the five parameters was missing, this probability dropped to 75% and was less than 50% when one, two, or three parameters were present. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of patients with IBC were not significantly different from those of the non-IBC control group that expressed four or five parameters (nIBC-1), but this nIBC-1 control group had a significantly worse outcome than the non-IBC control group (nIBC-2) with only 0-3 parameters (p = 0.0049 for OS and p < 0.0001 for DFS). In conclusion, an immunophenotypic signature was suggested for IBC. This could help to determine the worst cases, independent of clinical criteria. Copyright 2004 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14991891     DOI: 10.1002/path.1515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  75 in total

Review 1.  Molecular profiling in breast cancer.

Authors:  Shannon R Morris; Lisa A Carey
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 2.  Inflammatory breast cancer: what we know and what we need to learn.

Authors:  Hideko Yamauchi; Wendy A Woodward; Vicente Valero; Ricardo H Alvarez; Anthony Lucci; Thomas A Buchholz; Takayuki Iwamoto; Savitri Krishnamurthy; Wei Yang; James M Reuben; Gabriel N Hortobágyi; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-05-14

3.  Functional SNP in the microRNA-367 binding site in the 3'UTR of the calcium channel ryanodine receptor gene 3 (RYR3) affects breast cancer risk and calcification.

Authors:  Lina Zhang; Yuexin Liu; Fengju Song; Hong Zheng; Limei Hu; Hong Lu; Peifang Liu; Xishan Hao; Wei Zhang; Kexin Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cooperative interactions of HER-2 and HPV-16 oncoproteins in the malignant transformation of human mammary epithelial cells.

Authors:  Kathleen M Woods Ignatoski; Michele L Dziubinski; Cheryl Ammerman; Stephen P Ethier
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.715

5.  Overexpression of the ∆Np73 isoform is associated with centrosome amplification in brain tumor cell lines.

Authors:  Erika Mikulenkova; Jakub Neradil; Karel Zitterbart; Jaroslav Sterba; Renata Veselska
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-04-25

6.  Prolactinoma ErbB receptor expression and targeted therapy for aggressive tumors.

Authors:  Odelia Cooper; Adam Mamelak; Serguei Bannykh; John Carmichael; Vivien Bonert; Stephen Lim; Galen Cook-Wiens; Anat Ben-Shlomo
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.633

7.  Inhibition of Mammalian target of rapamycin by rapamycin causes the regression of carcinogen-induced skin tumor lesions.

Authors:  Panomwat Amornphimoltham; Kantima Leelahavanichkul; Alfredo Molinolo; Vyomesh Patel; J Silvio Gutkind
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Expression of Helios in gastric tumor cells predicts better survival in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Wei-Ming Chen; Cheng-Shyong Wu; Jing-Lan Liu; Chia-Ming Yeh; Libby Tseng; Hao-Chun Huang; Pey-Jium Chang; Shu-Fen Wu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 9.  Nitrative and oxidative stress in toxicology and disease.

Authors:  Ruth A Roberts; Debra L Laskin; Charles V Smith; Fredika M Robertson; Erin M G Allen; Jonathan A Doorn; William Slikker
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Lgl2 executes its function as a tumor suppressor by regulating ErbB signaling in the zebrafish epidermis.

Authors:  Sven Reischauer; Mitchell P Levesque; Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard; Mahendra Sonawane
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.