| Literature DB >> 28830384 |
Awa Ba Diallo1, Gedeon W Ossoga2, Geraldine Daneau3, Seynabou Lo4, Richard Ngandolo2, Colette Diguimbaye Djaibé5, Barou Djouater2, Souleymane Mboup6, Bouke C de Jong3, Aissatou G Diallo7, Florian Gehre3,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Emergence of Multidrug-resistant (MDR) strains constitutes a significant public health problem worldwide. Prevalence of MDR tuberculosis from Chad is unavailable to date.Entities:
Keywords: Chad; MDR; Molecular characterization; Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28830384 PMCID: PMC5567628 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2671-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Flowchart of processed samples collected from seven major cities in Chad between 2007 and 2012. AFB (Acid Fast Bacilli), MOTT (Mycobacteria Other Than Tuberculosis), MTBc (Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex), MDR (multidrug resistant), INH mono (INH monoresistant), RMP mono (Rifampicine monoresistant)
Fig. 2The geospatial proportional distribution of spoligotype-based mycobacterial families amongst the studied cities in Chad. Main pie charts indicate the lineage distribution. Numbers into brackets represent the number of strains
Main gene mutations found among isolates conferring resistance
| Gene | Probes | Codon analysed for rpoB and katG. nucleic acid position for inhA | Developing mutation band | Mutation | Resistance INH N (%) 42 (13. 50) | Resistance RIF N (%) 17 (5.47) | MDR N (%) 14 (4.50) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| rpoB | WT7 | 526–529 | rpoB MUT2A | H526Y | - | 5 (1.61) | 0 |
| rpoB MUT2B | H526D | 4 (1.29) | 0 | ||||
| WT8 | 530–533 | rpoB MUT3 | S531 L | - | 8 (2.57) | 7 (2.25) | |
| katG | WT | 315 | MUT1 | S315 T1 | 23 (7.40) | - | 7 (2.25) |
| MUT2 | S315 T2 | - | |||||
| inhA | WT1 | -15 | MUT1 | C15T | 19 (6.11) | - | - |
Fig. 3Neighbour-Joining Tree based on all isolates with any resistance to first-line drug in Chad. Individual spoligotypes, DST data and resistance-conferring mutations were taken into consideration. The asterisks (*) indicate the strains that were selected for pncA sequencing and the colour indicates all MDR for MIRU
Fig. 4Neighbour-Joining Tree of all MDR isolates based on individual spoligo- and 24-loci MIRU-VNTR-types, Clade, Year, SIT and pncA results. AGG (A = Adenine, G = Guanine)
Drug resistance profile according to lineages found in Chad
| Clade/Lineage | MDR | RMP mono | INH mono | Pan susceptible | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | (%) | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | |
| Afri-2 | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 2 | (100) | 2 |
| Cameroon | 8 | (6) | 8 | (6) | 17 | (13) | 97 | (75) | 130 |
| CAS1 | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 18 | (100) | 18 |
| EAI3-IND | 0 | (0) | 1 | 50 | 0 | (0) | 1 | (50) | 2 |
| H1 | 1 | (1) | 4 | (7) | 8 | (13) | 48 | (79) | 61 |
| H3 | 0 | (0) | 1 | (6) | 0 | (0) | 16 | (94) | 17 |
| LAM11 | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 1 | (100) | 1 |
| Manu1 | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 1 | (100) | 1 |
| Manu2 | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 2 | (100) | 2 |
| S | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 1 | (50) | 1 | (50) | 2 |
| T | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 2 | (67) | 1 | (33) | 3 |
| T1 | 3 | (13) | 2 | (8) | 7 | (29) | 12 | (50) | 24 |
| T1-RUS2 | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 1 | (11) | 8 | (19) | 9 |
| T2 | 1 | (5) | 1 | (5) | 2 | (10) | 17 | (80) | 21 |
| T3 | 1 | (100) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 1 |
| T5 | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 2 | (100) | 2 |
| T5-RUS2 | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 5 | (100) | 5 |
| X1 | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 1 | (33) | 2 | (67) | 3 |
| X2 | 0 | (0) | 0 | (0) | 3 | (43) | 4 | (57) | 7 |
| Total | 14 | (4.5) | 17 | (5.4) | 42 | (13.5) | 238 | (76.6) | 311 |