Literature DB >> 28829923

High intake of dairy during energy restriction does not affect energy balance or the intestinal microflora compared with low dairy intake in overweight individuals in a randomized controlled trial.

Line Quist Bendtsen1, Trine Blædel1, Jacob Bak Holm2, Janne Kunchel Lorenzen1, Alicja Budek Mark1, Pia Kiilerich2, Karsten Kristiansen2, Arne Astrup1, Lesli Hingstrup Larsen1.   

Abstract

During weight loss, dairy calcium is proposed to accelerate weight and fat-mass loss through increased fecal fat excretion. The primary objective was to investigate if a high-dairy energy-restricted diet is superior to low dairy in terms of changes in body weight, body composition, and fecal fat excretion over 24 weeks. Secondary objectives included fecal energy and calcium excretion, resting energy expenditure, blood pressure, lipid metabolism, and gut microbiota. In a randomized, parallel-arm intervention study, 11 men and 69 women (body mass index, 30.6 ± 0.3 kg/m2; age, 44 ± 1 years) were allocated to a 500-kcal (2100 kJ) -deficit diet that was either high (HD: 1500 mg calcium/day) or low (LD: 600 mg calcium/day) in dairy products for 24 weeks. Habitual calcium intake was ∼1000 mg/day. Body weight loss (HD: -6.6 ± 1.3 kg, LD: -7.9 ± 1.5 kg, P = 0.73), fat-mass loss (HD: -7.8% ± 1.3%, LD: -8.5% ± 1.1%, P = 0.76), changes in fecal fat excretion (HD: -0.57 ± 0.76 g, LD: 0.46 ± 0.70 g, P = 0.12), and microbiota composition were similar for the groups over 24 weeks. However, total fat-mass loss was positively associated with relative abundance of Papillibacter (P = 0.017) independent of diet group. Consumption of a high-dairy diet did not increase fecal fat or accelerate weight and fat-mass loss beyond energy restriction over 24 weeks in overweight and obese adults with a habitual calcium intake of ∼1000 mg/day. However, this study indicates that Papillibacter is involved in body compositional changes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body weight; calcium; dairy; energy restriction; masse corporelle; microbiota; microbiote; produits laitiers; restriction énergétique

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28829923     DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2017-0234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  9 in total

Review 1.  Impact of Food-Based Weight Loss Interventions on Gut Microbiome in Individuals with Obesity: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aleisha Bliesner; Jade Eccles-Smith; Claire Bates; Olivia Hayes; Jet Yee Ho; Catia Martins; Helen Truby; Marloes Dekker Nitert
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 6.706

2.  Effect of High versus Low Dairy Consumption on the Gut Microbiome: Results of a Randomized, Cross-Over Study.

Authors:  J Casper Swarte; Coby Eelderink; Rianne M Douwes; M Yusof Said; Shixian Hu; Adrian Post; Ralf Westerhuis; Stephan J L Bakker; Hermie J M Harmsen
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Metagenomic study of the gut microbiota associated with cow milk consumption in Chinese peri-/postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Bo Tian; Jia-Heng Yao; Xu Lin; Wan-Qiang Lv; Lin-Dong Jiang; Zhuo-Qi Wang; Jie Shen; Hong-Mei Xiao; Hanli Xu; Lu-Lu Xu; Xiyu Cheng; Hui Shen; Chuan Qiu; Zhe Luo; Lan-Juan Zhao; Qiong Yan; Hong-Wen Deng; Li-Shu Zhang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Calcium intake and the associations with faecal fat and energy excretion, and lipid profile in a free-living population.

Authors:  Louise Kjølbæk; Janne K Lorenzen; Lesli H Larsen; Arne Astrup
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2017-09-19

5.  Prevotella-to-Bacteroides ratio predicts body weight and fat loss success on 24-week diets varying in macronutrient composition and dietary fiber: results from a post-hoc analysis.

Authors:  Mads F Hjorth; Trine Blædel; Line Q Bendtsen; Janne K Lorenzen; Jacob B Holm; Pia Kiilerich; Henrik M Roager; Karsten Kristiansen; Lesli H Larsen; Arne Astrup
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.095

6.  Differences in Gut Microbial Diversity are Driven by Drug Use and Drug Cessation by Either Compulsory Detention or Methadone Maintenance Treatment.

Authors:  Qiaoyan Li; Siqi Chen; Ke Liu; Danfeng Long; Diru Liu; Zhengchao Jing; Xiaodan Huang
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-03-13

7.  The effects of dairy and dairy derivatives on the gut microbiota: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Hajara Aslam; Wolfgang Marx; Tetyana Rocks; Amy Loughman; Vinoomika Chandrasekaran; Anu Ruusunen; Samantha L Dawson; Madeline West; Eva Mullarkey; Julie A Pasco; Felice N Jacka
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2020-11-09

8.  Association between Milk Intake and All-Cause Mortality among Chinese Adults: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Xiaona Na; Hanglian Lan; Yu Wang; Yuefeng Tan; Jian Zhang; Ai Zhao
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  The association of weight loss with changes in the gut microbiota diversity, composition, and intestinal permeability: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dimitrios A Koutoukidis; Susan A Jebb; Matthew Zimmerman; Afolarin Otunla; J Aaron Henry; Anne Ferrey; Ella Schofield; Jade Kinton; Paul Aveyard; Julian R Marchesi
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.