Literature DB >> 28828694

Association between mammographic density and pregnancies relative to age and BMI: a breast cancer case-only analysis.

Carolin C Hack1, Julius Emons1, Sebastian M Jud1, Katharina Heusinger1, Werner Adler2, Paul Gass1, Lothar Haeberle1, Felix Heindl1, Alexander Hein1, Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland3, Michael Uder3, Arndt Hartmann4, Matthias W Beckmann1, Peter A Fasching5, Uwe G Pöhls6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Percentage mammographic density (PMD) is a major risk factor for breast cancer (BC). It is strongly associated with body mass index (BMI) and age, which are themselves risk factors for breast cancer. This analysis investigated the association between the number of full-term pregnancies and PMD in different subgroups relative to age and BMI.
METHODS: Patients were identified in the breast cancer database of the University Breast Center for Franconia. A total of 2410 patients were identified, for whom information on parity, age, and BMI, and a mammogram from the time of first diagnosis were available for assessing PMD. Linear regression analyses were conducted to investigate the influence on PMD of the number of full-term pregnancies (FTPs), age, BMI, and interaction terms between them.
RESULTS: As in previous studies, age, number of FTPs, and BMI were found to be associated with PMD in the expected direction. However, including the respective interaction terms improved the prediction of PMD even further. Specifically, the association between PMD and the number of FTPs differed in young patients under the age of 45 (mean decrease of 0.37 PMD units per pregnancy) from the association in older age groups (mean decrease between 2.29 and 2.39 PMD units). BMI did not alter the association between PMD and the number of FTPs.
CONCLUSIONS: The effect of pregnancies on mammographic density does not appear to become apparent before the age of menopause. The mechanism that drives the effect of pregnancies on mammographic density appears to be counter-regulated by other influences on mammographic density in younger patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Body mass index; Breast cancer; Breast density; Full-term pregnancy; Mammographic density

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28828694     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4446-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  6 in total

1.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast Medical Tactile Examiners (MTEs): A Prospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Michael P Lux; Julius Emons; Mayada R Bani; Marius Wunderle; Charlotte Sell; Caroline Preuss; Claudia Rauh; Sebastian M Jud; Felix Heindl; Hanna Langemann; Thomas Geyer; Anna-Lisa Brandl; Carolin C Hack; Werner Adler; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Matthias W Beckmann; Peter A Fasching; Paul Gass
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Factors associated with false-positive mammography at first screen in an Asian population.

Authors:  Peh Joo Ho; Chek Mei Bok; Hanis Mariyah Mohd Ishak; Li Yan Lim; Jenny Liu; Fuh Yong Wong; Kee Seng Chia; Min-Han Tan; Wen Yee Chay; Mikael Hartman; Jingmei Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Change in mammographic density across birth cohorts of Dutch breast cancer screening participants.

Authors:  George Napolitano; Elsebeth Lynge; Martin Lillholm; Ilse Vejborg; Carla H van Gils; Mads Nielsen; Nico Karssemeijer
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Update Breast Cancer 2022 Part 3 - Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Tanja N Fehm; Manfred Welslau; Volkmar Müller; Diana Lüftner; Florian Schütz; Peter A Fasching; Wolfgang Janni; Christoph Thomssen; Isabell Witzel; Erik Belleville; Michael Untch; Marc Thill; Hans Tesch; Nina Ditsch; Michael P Lux; Bahriye Aktas; Maggie Banys-Paluchowski; Andreas Schneeweiss; Cornelia Kolberg-Liedtke; Andreas D Hartkopf; Achim Wöckel; Hans-Christian Kolberg; Nadia Harbeck; Elmar Stickeler
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Mammography breast density: an effective supplemental modality for the precise grading of ultrasound BI-RADS 4 categories.

Authors:  Wei-Min Li; Qiu-Wei Sun; Xiao-Fang Fan; Jun-Chao Zhang; Ting Xu; Qi-Qi Shen; Lei Jia
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-06

6.  RANKL and OPG and their influence on breast volume changes during pregnancy in healthy women.

Authors:  Marius Wunderle; Matthias Ruebner; Lothar Häberle; Eva Schwenke; Carolin C Hack; Christian M Bayer; Martin C Koch; Judith Schwitulla; Ruediger Schulz-Wendtland; Ivona Kozieradzki; Michael P Lux; Matthias W Beckmann; Sebastian M Jud; Josef M Penninger; Michael O Schneider; Peter A Fasching
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.