Literature DB >> 28827151

Endothelial and cardiac progenitor cells for cardiovascular repair: A controversial paradigm in cell therapy.

Vanessa Bianconi1, Amirhossein Sahebkar2, Petri Kovanen3, Francesco Bagaglia1, Biagio Ricciuti4, Paolo Calabrò5, Giuseppe Patti6, Matteo Pirro7.   

Abstract

Stem cells have the potential to differentiate into cardiovascular cell lineages and to stimulate tissue regeneration in a paracrine/autocrine manner; thus, they have been extensively studied as candidate cell sources for cardiovascular regeneration. Several preclinical and clinical studies addressing the therapeutic potential of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and cardiac progenitor cells (CPCs) in cardiovascular diseases have been performed. For instance, autologous EPC transplantation and EPC mobilization through pharmacological agents contributed to vascular repair and neovascularization in different animal models of limb ischemia and myocardial infarction. Also, CPC administration and in situ stimulation of resident CPCs have been shown to improve myocardial survival and function in experimental models of ischemic heart disease. However, clinical studies using EPC- and CPC-based therapeutic approaches have produced mixed results. In this regard, intracoronary, intra-myocardial or intramuscular injection of either bone marrow-derived or peripheral blood progenitor cells has improved pathological features of tissue ischemia in humans, despite modest or no clinical benefit has been observed in most cases. Also, the intriguing scientific background surrounding the potential clinical applications of EPC capture stenting is still waiting for a confirmatory proof. Moreover, clinical findings on the efficacy of CPC-based cell therapy in heart diseases are still very preliminary and based on small-size studies. Despite promising evidence, widespread clinical application of both EPCs and CPCs remains delayed due to several unresolved issues. The present review provides a summary of the different applications of EPCs and CPCs for cardiovascular cell therapy and underlies their advantages and limitations.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CPC; EPC; Endothelial progenitor cells; Myocardial infarction; Regenerative medicine; Stem cells

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28827151     DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0163-7258            Impact factor:   12.310


  40 in total

1.  Pretargeting and Bioorthogonal Click Chemistry-Mediated Endogenous Stem Cell Homing for Heart Repair.

Authors:  Zhenhua Li; Deliang Shen; Shiqi Hu; Teng Su; Ke Huang; Feiran Liu; Lei Hou; Ke Cheng
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  N-acetylcysteine differentially regulates the populations of bone marrow and circulating endothelial progenitor cells in mice with limb ischemia.

Authors:  Yuqi Cui; Lingjuan Liu; Yuan Xiao; Xin Li; Jia Zhang; Xiaoyun Xie; Jie Tian; Chandan K Sen; Xiaoming He; Hong Hao; Zhenguo Liu
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-31       Impact factor: 4.432

3.  A Cell-Free SDKP-Conjugated Self-Assembling Peptide Hydrogel Sufficient for Improvement of Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Saman Firoozi; Sara Pahlavan; Mohammad-Hossein Ghanian; Shahram Rabbani; Shima Tavakol; Maryam Barekat; Saeed Yakhkeshi; Elena Mahmoudi; Mansoureh Soleymani; Hossein Baharvand
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-01-30

4.  Antibody-Armed Platelets for the Regenerative Targeting of Endogenous Stem Cells.

Authors:  Deliang Shen; Zhenhua Li; Shiqi Hu; Ke Huang; Teng Su; Hongxia Liang; Feiran Liu; Ke Cheng
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  The potential role of circulating exosomes in protecting myocardial injury in acute myocardial infarction via regulating miR-190a-3p/CXCR4/CXCL12 pathway.

Authors:  Chun-Yuan Jiang; Ting-Ting Zhong; Lu-Wen Qiu; Yan-Feng Liu; Hui-Hua Zuo; Xiao-Fei Huang
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 3.853

Review 6.  A review on heme oxygenase-1 induction: is it a necessary evil.

Authors:  Ajaz Ahmad Waza; Zeenat Hamid; Sajad Ali; Shabir Ahmad Bhat; Musadiq Ahmad Bhat
Journal:  Inflamm Res       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 4.575

Review 7.  Stem cell therapies and benefaction of somatic cell nuclear transfer cloning in COVID-19 era.

Authors:  Birbal Singh; Gorakh Mal; Vinod Verma; Ruchi Tiwari; Muhammad Imran Khan; Ranjan K Mohapatra; Saikat Mitra; Salem A Alyami; Talha Bin Emran; Kuldeep Dhama; Mohammad Ali Moni
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 8.  Effects of statins on the biological features of mesenchymal stem cells and therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Armita Mahdavi Gorabi; Nasim Kiaie; Matteo Pirro; Vanessa Bianconi; Tannaz Jamialahmadi; Amirhossein Sahebkar
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 4.214

9.  Rab27a deletion impairs the therapeutic potential of endothelial progenitor cells for myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Wenyi Zhou; Xuefei Zheng; Chuanfang Cheng; Guixian Guo; Yun Zhong; Weihua Liu; Kefeng Liu; Yanfang Chen; Shiming Liu; Shaojun Liu
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.396

10.  Circulating endothelial progenitor cells during pregnancy in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Giulia Mallucci; Fausta Beneventi; Roberto Bergamaschi; Cristina Bizzotto; Chiara Cavagnoli; Irene De Maggio; Camilla Bellingeri; Cristina Monti; Gianluca Viarengo; Arsenio Spinillo
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.307

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.