Literature DB >> 28826768

Probiotic characters of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are a result of the ongoing gene acquisition and genome minimization evolutionary trends.

Moslem Papizadeh1, Mahdi Rohani1, Hossein Nahrevanian2, Abdolreza Javadi3, Mohammad Reza Pourshafie4.   

Abstract

Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus are the main probiotic genera. Collectively, these two genera harbor over 200 species among which are many strains have been introduced as probiotics. These health-promoting microbes confer health benefits upon the host and so used in food productions and as supplements. Considering the economic importance of probiotics, the biochemistry, genomics, phylogeny and physiology of such genera have been exhaustively studied. According to the genomic data, the probiotic capabilities are strain specific which may be a result of the niche-specialization of the genomes of these bacteria to certain ecological niches like gastrointestinal tract of a diverse range of animals. These microbes have a wide distribution but the culture-based studies and either genomics data suggest selective affinity of some Lactobacillus and either Bifidobacterium species to certain ecological niches. An ongoing genome degradation, which is thought to be a result of passage through an evolutionary bottleneck, is the major trend in the evolution of lactobacilli. Further, evolutionary events resulted into two categories of lactobacilli: habitat generalists and habitat specialists. In place, the main trend in the evolution of bifidobacteria tend to be the gene acquisition. However, probiotic features are the results of a co-evolutionary relationship between these bacteria and their hosts and the aforementioned evolutionary tends have driven the evolution of these probiotic genera.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Genomics; Microbe-host interaction; Microbial ecology; Probiotics; Reductive evolution; Strain-specific characters

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28826768     DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.08.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Pathog        ISSN: 0882-4010            Impact factor:   3.738


  11 in total

1.  Antioxidant potential of Pediococcus pentosaceus strains from the sow milk bacterial collection in weaned piglets.

Authors:  Leli Wang; Qihang Liu; Yuwei Chen; Xinlei Zheng; Chuni Wang; Yining Qi; Yachao Dong; Yue Xiao; Cang Chen; Taohong Chen; Qiuyun Huang; Zongzhao Zhai; Cimin Long; Huansheng Yang; Jianzhong Li; Lei Wang; Gaihua Zhang; Peng Liao; Yong-Xin Liu; Peng Huang; Jialu Huang; Qiye Wang; Huanhuan Chu; Jia Yin; Yulong Yin
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 16.837

2.  Genus-Wide Assessment of Antibiotic Resistance in Lactobacillus spp.

Authors:  Ilenia Campedelli; Harsh Mathur; Elisa Salvetti; Siobhán Clarke; Mary C Rea; Sandra Torriani; R Paul Ross; Colin Hill; Paul W O'Toole
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-12-13       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Gut Microbiota Composition Before and After Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors.

Authors:  Mariko Hojo; Takashi Asahara; Akihito Nagahara; Tsutomu Takeda; Kohei Matsumoto; Hiroya Ueyama; Kenshi Matsumoto; Daisuke Asaoka; Takuya Takahashi; Koji Nomoto; Yuichiro Yamashiro; Sumio Watanabe
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Determination of free and conjugated bile acids in serum of Apoe(-/-) mice fed different lingonberry fractions by UHPLC-MS.

Authors:  Tannaz Ghaffarzadegan; Sofia Essén; Phebe Verbrugghe; Nittaya Marungruang; Frida Fåk Hållenius; Margareta Nyman; Margareta Sandahl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  In Vitro Evaluation of the Effects of Tylosin on the Composition and Metabolism of Canine Fecal Microbiota.

Authors:  Carlo Pinna; Carla Giuditta Vecchiato; Monica Grandi; Ludovica Maria Eugenia Mammi; Claudio Stefanelli; Giacomo Biagi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Can Gut Microbiota Affect Dry Eye Syndrome?

Authors:  Jayoon Moon; Chang Ho Yoon; Se Hyun Choi; Mee Kum Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Niche-Specific Adaptive Evolution of Lactobacillus plantarum Strains Isolated From Human Feces and Paocai.

Authors:  Qiqi Pan; Shi Cen; Leilei Yu; Fengwei Tian; Jianxin Zhao; Hao Zhang; Wei Chen; Qixiao Zhai
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 5.293

8.  Investigating the microbiota of fermented fish products (Pla-ra) from different communities of northeastern Thailand.

Authors:  Rutchanee Rodpai; Oranuch Sanpool; Tongjit Thanchomnang; Arporn Wangwiwatsin; Lakkhana Sadaow; Weeraya Phupiewkham; Patcharaporn Boonroumkaew; Pewpan M Intapan; Wanchai Maleewong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Ethnic Specificity of Species and Strain Composition of Lactobacillus Populations From Mother-Infant Pairs, Uncovered by Multilocus Sequence Typing.

Authors:  Lixia Yuan; Xueling Zhang; Baolong Luo; Xu Li; Fengwei Tian; Wenli Yan; Yongqing Ni
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  In Vitro Selection of Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Antioxidants to Develop an Innovative Synbiotic (NatuREN G) and Testing Its Effect in Reducing Uremic Toxins in Fecal Batches from CKD Patients.

Authors:  Mirco Vacca; Giuseppe Celano; Marcello Salvatore Lenucci; Sergio Fontana; Flavia Maria la Forgia; Fabio Minervini; Aurelia Scarano; Angelo Santino; Giuseppe Dalfino; Loreto Gesualdo; Maria De Angelis
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-06-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.