Literature DB >> 28826680

Patient Characteristics Associated With Quality of Colonoscopy Preparation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Kunjal Gandhi1, Christina Tofani2, Carly Sokach3, Devin Patel3, David Kastenberg2, Constantine Daskalakis4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Some features of patients are associated with inadequate bowel preparation, which reduces the effectiveness of colonoscopy examination. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between patients' sociodemographic characteristics, health conditions, and medications with inadequate bowel preparation.
METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Review databases for randomized controlled trials cohort (prospective and retrospective), case-control, and cross-sectional studies published through March 2016. We collected information on study design, study population, and bowel preparation. For each factor, we obtained the odds ratio (OR) for inadequate bowel preparation. We conducted the meta-analyses using the random-effects approach and investigated any identified heterogeneity and publication bias via graphical methods, stratification, and meta-regression.
RESULTS: We performed a meta-analysis of 67 studies, comprising 75,818 patients. The estimated pooled OR for inadequate bowel preparation was small for sociodemographic characteristics: 1.14 for age, and 1.23 for male sex (excluding studies in Asia, which had substantial heterogeneity and publication bias), and 1.49 for low education. The effect of high body mass index differed significantly in studies with mostly female patients (OR, 1.05) vs those with mostly male patients (OR, 1.30) (P = .013 for the difference). ORs for constipation and cirrhosis were heterogeneous; adjusted ORs were larger than unadjusted ORs (1.97 vs 1.29 for constipation and 3.41 vs 1.36 for cirrhosis). Diabetes (OR, 1.79), hypertension (OR, 1.25), stroke or dementia (OR, 2.09), and opioid use (OR, 1.70) were associated with inadequate bowel preparation. History of abdominal surgery (OR, 0.99) did not associate with inadequate bowel preparation. Use of tricyclic antidepressants had a larger effect on risk of inadequate bowel preparation in studies of mostly female patients (OR, 2.62) than studies of mostly male patients (OR, 1.42) (P = .085 for the difference).
CONCLUSIONS: In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found no single patient-related factor to be solely associated with inadequate bowel preparation. Health conditions and use of some medications appear to be stronger predictors than sociodemographic characteristics.
Copyright © 2018 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Inadequate Preparation; Meta-Analysis; Predictors

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28826680     DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2017.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1542-3565            Impact factor:   11.382


  20 in total

Review 1.  Which Patient-Related Factors Determine Optimal Bowel Preparation?

Authors:  Myriam Martel; Charles Ménard; Sophie Restellini; Omar Kherad; Majid Almadi; Maïté Bouchard; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-12

2.  Pilot Study: Neurocognitive Disorders and Colonoscopy in Older Adults.

Authors:  Franchesca Arias; Michael Riverso; Shellie-Anne Levy; Rebecca Armstrong; David S Estores; Patrick Tighe; Catherine C Price
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Comparing the Real-World Effectiveness of Competing Colonoscopy Preparations: Results of a Prospective Trial.

Authors:  Phillip Gu; Daniel Lew; Sun Jung Oh; Aarshi Vipani; Jeffrey Ko; Kevin Hsu; Ebrahim Mirakhor; Varun Pattisapu; Tia Bullen; Garth Fuller; Brennan M R Spiegel; Christopher V Almario
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  External validation of two prediction models for adequate bowel preparation in Asia: a prospective study.

Authors:  Xin Yuan; Hui Gao; Cenqin Liu; Weihong Wang; Jiarong Xie; Zhixin Zhang; Lei Xu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Predictors of poor bowel preparations and colonoscopy cancellations in inpatient colonoscopies, a single center retrospective study.

Authors:  Rohit Agrawal; Muhammad Majeed; Bashar M Attar; Estefania Flores; Zohaib Haque; Sheeba Ba Aqeel; Yuchen Wang; Yazan Abu Omar; Pradeep Parajuli; Melchor Demetria; Seema Gandhi
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-01-25

6.  Predictive factors of inadequate bowel preparation for elective colonoscopy.

Authors:  Amir Sadeghi; Mohsen Rajabnia; Mohammad Bagheri; Shaghayegh Jamshidizadeh; Samane Saberi; Paria Shahnazi; Leila Pasharavesh; Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi; Mona Mirzaei; Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei; Mohammad Reza Zali
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench       Date:  2022

7.  A 3-day low-fibre diet does not improve colonoscopy preparation results compared to a 1-day diet: A randomized, single-blind, controlled trial.

Authors:  Filipe Taveira; Miguel Areia; Luís Elvas; Susana Alves; Daniel Brito; Sandra Saraiva; Ana T Cadime
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 4.623

8.  A statewide program providing colorectal cancer screening to the uninsured of South Carolina.

Authors:  Jan M Eberth; Annie Thibault; Renay Caldwell; Michele J Josey; Beidi Qiang; Edsel Peña; Delecia LaFrance; Franklin G Berger
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Efficacy of ultra-low volume (≤1 L) bowel preparation fluids: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Milou L M van Riswijk; Kelly E van Keulen; Peter D Siersema
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 6.337

10.  Bowel-cleansing efficacy of the 1L polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation NER1006 (PLENVU) in patient subgroups in two phase III trials.

Authors:  Sandra Baile-Maxia; Bharat Amlani; Rodrigo Jover Martínez
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.409

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.