Literature DB >> 28825997

SIAMOC position paper on gait analysis in clinical practice: General requirements, methods and appropriateness. Results of an Italian consensus conference.

Maria Grazia Benedetti1, Ettore Beghi2, Antonio De Tanti3, Aurelio Cappozzo4, Nino Basaglia5, Andrea Giovanni Cutti6, Andrea Cereatti7, Rita Stagni8, Federica Verdini9, Mario Manca5, Silvia Fantozzi8, Claudia Mazzà10, Valentina Camomilla4, Isabella Campanini11, Anna Castagna12, Lorenzo Cavazzuti13, Martina Del Maestro14, Ugo Della Croce7, Marco Gasperi15, Tommaso Leo9, Pia Marchi5, Maurizio Petrarca16, Luigi Piccinini17, Marco Rabuffetti18, Andrea Ravaschio19, Zimi Sawacha20, Fabiola Spolaor20, Luigi Tesio21, Giuseppe Vannozzi4, Isabella Visintin22, Maurizio Ferrarin18.   

Abstract

Gait analysis is recognized as a useful assessment tool in the field of human movement research. However, doubts remain on its real effectiveness as a clinical tool, i.e. on its capability to change the diagnostic-therapeutic practice. In particular, the conditions in which evidence of a favorable cost-benefit ratio is found and the methodology for properly conducting and interpreting the exam are not identified clearly. To provide guidelines for the use of Gait Analysis in the context of rehabilitation medicine, SIAMOC (the Italian Society of Clinical Movement Analysis) promoted a National Consensus Conference which was held in Bologna on September 14th, 2013. The resulting recommendations were the result of a three-stage process entailing i) the preparation of working documents on specific open issues, ii) the holding of the consensus meeting, and iii) the drafting of consensus statements by an external Jury. The statements were formulated based on scientific evidence or experts' opinion, when the quality/quantity of the relevant literature was deemed insufficient. The aim of this work is to disseminate the consensus statements. These are divided into 13 questions grouped in three areas of interest: 1) General requirements and management, 2) Methodological and instrumental issues, and 3) Scientific evidence and clinical appropriateness. SIAMOC hopes that this document will contribute to improve clinical practice and help promoting further research in the field.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amputation; Amputee; Brain injuries; Cerebral pulsy; Clinics; Consensus conference; EMG; Force plate; Gait analysis; Human movement; Kinematics; Stereophotogrammetry

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28825997     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  15 in total

1.  A standardised template for reporting lower limb kinematic waveform movement compensations from a sensor-based portable clinical movement analysis toolkit.

Authors:  K Button; M Felemban; J L Davies; K Nicholas; J Parry-Williams; Q Muaidi; M Al-Amri
Journal:  IPEM Transl       Date:  2022-04

Review 2.  Fundamental Concepts of Bipolar and High-Density Surface EMG Understanding and Teaching for Clinical, Occupational, and Sport Applications: Origin, Detection, and Main Errors.

Authors:  Isabella Campanini; Andrea Merlo; Catherine Disselhorst-Klug; Luca Mesin; Silvia Muceli; Roberto Merletti
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Electromyographic and Joint Kinematic Patterns in Runner's Dystonia.

Authors:  Omar F Ahmad; Pritha Ghosh; Christopher Stanley; Barbara Karp; Mark Hallett; Codrin Lungu; Katharine Alter
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 4.546

4.  A Systematic Review Establishing the Current State-of-the-Art, the Limitations, and the DESIRED Checklist in Studies of Direct Neural Interfacing With Robotic Gait Devices in Stroke Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Olive Lennon; Michele Tonellato; Alessandra Del Felice; Roberto Di Marco; Caitriona Fingleton; Attila Korik; Eleonora Guanziroli; Franco Molteni; Christoph Guger; Rupert Otner; Damien Coyle
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 5.  The Motion of Body Center of Mass During Walking: A Review Oriented to Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Luigi Tesio; Viviana Rota
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Plantar load transfer in children: a descriptive study with two pathological case studies.

Authors:  Alexis Brierty; Christopher P Carty; Claudia Giacomozzi; Teresa Phillips; Henry P J Walsh; David Bade; Sean Horan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Non-invasive Focal Mechanical Vibrations Delivered by Wearable Devices: An Open-Label Pilot Study in Childhood Ataxia.

Authors:  Tommaso Schirinzi; Alberto Romano; Martina Favetta; Andrea Sancesario; Riccardo Burattini; Susanna Summa; Gessica Della Bella; Enrico Castelli; Enrico Bertini; Maurizio Petrarca; Gessica Vasco
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Usefulness of Magnetoinertial Wearable Devices in Neurorehabilitation of Children with Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Marco Iosa; Manuela de Sanctis; Aurora Summa; Elena Bergamini; Daniela Morelli; Giuseppe Vannozzi
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 1.781

9.  Integrating a gait analysis test in hospital rehabilitation: A service design approach.

Authors:  Javier Marín; Teresa Blanco; José J Marín; Alejandro Moreno; Elena Martitegui; Juan C Aragüés
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Gait Alterations in Adults after Ankle Fracture: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marta Mirando; Corrado Conti; Federica Zeni; Fabio Pedicini; Antonio Nardone; Chiara Pavese
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.