Alexis Brierty1,2,3, Christopher P Carty4,5,6,7, Claudia Giacomozzi8, Teresa Phillips5, Henry P J Walsh5,6, David Bade5,6, Sean Horan9. 1. Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, 4222, Australia. alexis.brierty@griffithuni.edu.au. 2. Queensland Children's Motion Analysis Service, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia. alexis.brierty@griffithuni.edu.au. 3. School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, 4222, Australia. alexis.brierty@griffithuni.edu.au. 4. Griffith Centre of Biomedical and Rehabilitation Engineering (GCORE), Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, 4222, Australia. 5. Queensland Children's Motion Analysis Service, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia. 6. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 4101, Australia. 7. Research Development Unit, Caboolture Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Caboolture, Gold Coast, QLD, 4510, Australia. 8. Italian National Institute of Health (Istituto Superiore di Sanità), Viale Regina Elena, 299, 00161, Rome, RM, Italy. 9. School of Allied Health Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, 4222, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Typical gait is often considered to be highly symmetrical, with gait asymmetries typically associated with pathological gait. Whilst gait symmetry is often expressed in symmetry ratios, measures of symmetry do not provide insight into how these asymmetries affect gait variables. To fully understand changes caused by gait asymmetry, we must first develop a normative database for comparison. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe normative reference values of regional plantar load and present comparisons with two pathological case studies. METHODS: A descriptive study of the load transfer of plantar pressures in typically developed children was conducted to develop a baseline for comparison of the effects of gait asymmetry in paediatric clinical populations. Plantar load and 3D kinematic data was collected for 17 typically developed participants with a mean age of 9.4 ± 4.0 years. Two case studies were also included; a 10-year-old male with clubfoot and an 8-year-old female with a flatfoot deformity. Data was analysed using a kinematics-pressure integration technique for anatomical masking into 5 regions of interest; medial and lateral forefoot, midfoot, and medial and lateral hindfoot. RESULTS: Clear differences between the two case studies and the typical dataset were seen for the load transfer phase of gait. For case study one, lateral bias was seen in the forefoot of the trailing foot across all variables, as well as increases in contact area, force and mean pressure in the lateral hindfoot of the leading foot. For case study two, the forefoot of the trailing foot produced results very similar to the typical dataset across all variables. In the hindfoot of the leading foot, medial bias presents most notably in the force and mean pressure graphs. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the clinical significance of the load transfer phase of gait, providing meaningful information for intervention planning.
BACKGROUND: Typical gait is often considered to be highly symmetrical, with gait asymmetries typically associated with pathological gait. Whilst gait symmetry is often expressed in symmetry ratios, measures of symmetry do not provide insight into how these asymmetries affect gait variables. To fully understand changes caused by gait asymmetry, we must first develop a normative database for comparison. Therefore, the aim of this study was to describe normative reference values of regional plantar load and present comparisons with two pathological case studies. METHODS: A descriptive study of the load transfer of plantar pressures in typically developed children was conducted to develop a baseline for comparison of the effects of gait asymmetry in paediatric clinical populations. Plantar load and 3D kinematic data was collected for 17 typically developed participants with a mean age of 9.4 ± 4.0 years. Two case studies were also included; a 10-year-old male with clubfoot and an 8-year-old female with a flatfoot deformity. Data was analysed using a kinematics-pressure integration technique for anatomical masking into 5 regions of interest; medial and lateral forefoot, midfoot, and medial and lateral hindfoot. RESULTS: Clear differences between the two case studies and the typical dataset were seen for the load transfer phase of gait. For case study one, lateral bias was seen in the forefoot of the trailing foot across all variables, as well as increases in contact area, force and mean pressure in the lateral hindfoot of the leading foot. For case study two, the forefoot of the trailing foot produced results very similar to the typical dataset across all variables. In the hindfoot of the leading foot, medial bias presents most notably in the force and mean pressure graphs. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the clinical significance of the load transfer phase of gait, providing meaningful information for intervention planning.
Entities:
Keywords:
Children; Load transfer; Plantar load; Plantar pressure; Typically developed